Government organizations' innovative use of the Internet: The case of the Twitter activity of South Korea's Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 9-23

  Cho, Seong Eun ^a   Park, Han Woo ^a,b,c  

^a Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

^b Asia Triple Helix Society   (South Korea)

^c The WCU Webometrics Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Government; Innovative; Policy promotion; Semantic network analysis; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655181789     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0519-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barash, V., & Golder, S. (2010). Twitter: Conversation, entertainment, and information, all in one network! Ch 10. In D. Hansen, B. Shneiderman, & M. A. Smith (Eds.), Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. P. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Paper presented in the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
3. Cho, S. E., Park, J. Y., & Park, H. W. (2011, forthcoming). Public relations of government organizations in the era of web2. 0. In H. W. Park (Ed.). An introduction to Social Media. KyeongSan: WCU Webometrics Institute. Written in Korean.
4. Fang, Z. (2002). E-government in digital era: Concept, practice, and development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 10, 1-22.
5. Garrett, R. K. (2011). Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research, 37, 255-274.
6. Goldbeck, J., Grimes, J., & Rogers, A. (2009). Twitter use by the U. S. congress. The paper presented in Human-Computer Interaction lab 27th Annual Symposium. Retrieved from http://hcil. cs. umd. edu/trs/2009-32/2009-32. pdf.
7. Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (Eds.). (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Hansen, D., Smith, M. A., & Shneiderman, B. (2011). Event graphs: Charting collections of conference connections. A paper presented to the Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Hawaii, USA.
9. Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Holmberg, K. (2010). Co-inlinking to a municipal Web space: A webometric and content analysis. Scientometrics, 83, 851-862.
11. Holmberg, K., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Local government web sites in Finland: A geographic and webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 79, 157-169.
12. Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6, 248-260.
13. Jo, H. J. (2010). Twitter and e-Government: Case studies of domestic and international political situation and regulation. Presented at The Korean Association for Regional Information Soceity Annual Conference. Written in Korean.
14. Khan, G. F., Moon, J. H., Park, H. W., Swar, B., & Rho, J. J. (2011). A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: A scientometrics approach. Scientometrics, 87(2), 267-286.
15. Khan, G. F., & Park, H. W. (2011, forthcoming). Measuring the Triple Helix on the Web: Longitudinal trends in the University-Industry-Government relationship in Korea. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
16. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122-136.
17. Lim, Y. S., & Park. H. W. (2010). Webometrics analysis of blog campaigns during 10. 28 by-election. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 12, 539-551. Written in Korean.
18. Lim, Y. S., & Park, H. W. (2011, forthcoming). How do congressional members appear on the web? Tracking the web visibility of South Korean politicians. Government Information Quarterly.
19. National Information Society Agency. (July 2009). CIO (Chief Information Officer) report: Digital government. Seoul: National Information Society Agency, 14. Written in Korean.
20. Park, H. W. (2003). Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web. Connections, 25, 49-61.
21. Park, H. W. (2004). Presence of Taiwan on the world wide web in South Korea: Dynamics of digital and geographical presence in cyberspace. International Information & Library Review, 36, 329-340.
22. Park, H. W. (2010). Research of the humanities and social science in the e-science age: Internet research method. Social Science Research, 30. Written in Korean.
23. Park, H. W., & Bae, A. J. (2007). How 17th members of the National Assembly use websites: Optimistic and pessimistic views of digital politics. Digital Communication Review, 3, 57-93. Written in Korean.
24. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65, 3-27.
25. Park, H. W., & Lee, Y. O. (2009). Complex text analysis using portal replies: Kwangun University BBK event on Daum. net during the 17th presidential election. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 11, 731-744. Written in Korean.
26. Park, H. W., Lee, Y. O., & Ryu, Y. D. (2009). Online discussion group network and civic participation. Issue Report for Information Culture and Digital Divide, 69. (written in Korean).
27. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding and application of KrKwic program for Korean content analysis. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 6, 1377-1388.
28. Park, H. W., Park, S. J., Stuart, D., & Lee, S. W. (2009). Understanding of WeboNaver, a search engine program using the API: A web visibility analysis of members of the 18th National Assembly. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 11, 3427-3440. (written in Korean).
29. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. Retrieved December 09, 2005, from http://jcmc. indiana. edu/vol1/issue4/parks. html.
30. Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). Making MOOsic: The development of personal relationships on-line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. A paper presented at the annual conference of the Western Speech Communication Association. Monterey, California. February, 1997. Retrieved from http://www. geser. net. moo. htm.
31. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effect in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
32. Wasserman, S. K., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Wigand, F. D. L. (2010). Twitter in government: Building relationships one tweet at time. Presented in Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), 7th International Conference at Las Vegas, NV (pp. 563-567). 12-14 April 2010.
34. Wu, G., Hu, X., & Wu, Y. (2010). Effects of perceived interactivity, perceived web assurance and disposition to trust on initial online trust. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 1-26.
35. Yan, E., & Zhu, Q. (2008). Hyperlink analysis for government websites of Chinese provincial capitals. Scientometrics, 76, 315-326.
36. Yum, J. O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55, 374-388.