International practice patterns and factors associated with non-conventional hemodialysis utilization

BMC Nephrology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Allen, Nathan ^a   Schwartz, Daniel ^b   Komenda, Paul ^a   Pauly, Robert P ^c   Zimmerman, Deborah ^d   Tanna, Gemini ^e   Schiff, Jeffery ^f   Rigatto, Claudio ^a   Sood, Manish M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFRICA; ARTICLE; ASIA; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CONVENTIONAL HEMODIALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EUROPE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEMODIALYSIS; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERNET; LONG CONVENTIONAL HEMODIALYSIS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MIDDLE EAST; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NEW ZEALAND; NOCTURNAL HEMODIALYSIS; NON CONVENTIONAL HEMODIALYSIS; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; QUALITY OF LIFE; REIMBURSEMENT; SHORT DAILY HEMODIALYSIS; SOUTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; RENAL DIALYSIS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 82655170598     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-66     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. In-Center Hemodialysis Six Times per Week versus Three Times per Week. Frequent Hemodialysis Network, New England Journal of Medicine 2010 363 24 2287 300 21091062
2. Effect of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis vs Conventional Hemodialysis on Left Ventricular Mass and Quality of Life. Culleton BF, Walsh M, Klarenbach SW, Mortis G, Scott-Douglas N, Quinn RR, et al. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2007 2007 298 11 1291 9 10.1001/jama.298.11.1291 (Pubitemid 47443343)
3. Nocturnal haemodialysis: An Australian cost comparison with conventional satellite haemodialysis (Review Article). Agar JW, Knight RJ, Simmonds RE, Boddington JM, Waldron CM, Somerville CA, Nephrology 2005 10 6 557 70 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00471.x 16354238 (Pubitemid 41801835)
4. Cost savings of home nocturnal versus conventional in-center hemodialysis. McFarlane PA, Pierratos A, Redelmeier DA, Kidney Int 2002 62 6 2216 22 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00678.x 12427148 (Pubitemid 35366178)
5. The case for dialy dialysis: Its impact on costs and quality of life. Mohr PE, Neumann PJ, Franco SJ, Marainen J, Lockridge R, Ting G, American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2001 37 4 777 89 10.1016/S0272-6386(01)80127-X (Pubitemid 32268039)
6. Patient-Perceived Barriers to the Adoption of Nocturnal Home Hemodialysis. Cafazzo JA, Leonard K, Easty AC, Rossos PG, Chan CT, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2009 4 4 784 9 10.2215/CJN.05501008 19339408
7. The cost of starting and maintaining a large home hemodialysis program. Komenda P, Copland M, Makwana J, Djurdjev O, Sood MM, Levin A, Kidney Int 2010 77 11 1039 45 10.1038/ki.2010.37 20375983
8. The renaissance of home hemodialysis: Where we are, why we got here, what is happening in the United States and elsewhere. Blagg CR, Hemodialysis International 2008 12 2 S5 18837764
9. Home haemodialysis - international trends and variation. MacGregor MS, Agar JWM, Blagg CR, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21 7 1934 45 10.1093/ndt/gfl093 (Pubitemid 43985723)
10. Perceived barriers to guidelines in peritoneal dialysis. Allen N, Schwartz D, Sood AR, Mendelssohn D, Verrelli M, Tanna G, et al. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2011 26 5 1683 9 10.1093/ndt/gfq623
11. DO E-Mail Alerts of New Research Increase Knowledge Translation? A "Nephrology Now" Randomized Control Trial. Tanna GV, Sood MM, Schiff J, Schwartz D, Naimark DM, Academic Medicine 2011 86 1 132 8 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ffe89e 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ffe89e 21099399
12. Core health indicators report. WHO, 2008 http://apps.who.int/whosis/ database/core/core-select.cfm [cited 2011 April 15]
13. Short daily haemodialysis: survival in 415 patients treated for 1006 patient-years. Kjellstrand CM, Buoncristiani U, Ting G, Traeger J, Piccoli GB, Sibai-Galland R, et al. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23 10 3283 9 10.1093/ndt/gfn210
14. Survival and hospitalization among patients using nocturnal and short daily compared to conventional hemodialysis: a USRDS study. Johansen KL, Zhang R, Huang Y, Chen S-C, Blagg CR, Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS, et al. Kidney Int 2009 76 9 984 90 10.1038/ki.2009.291 19692997
15. The economics of home nocturnal hemodialysis: how should we cost the benefits? Komenda PLA, Manns B, Clinical nephrology 2007 68 151 8 17915617 (Pubitemid 47377337)
16. Long 3 × 8 hr dialysis: A three-decade summary. B Charra CC, Jean G, Hurot J-M, Vanel T, Terrat J-C, VoVan C, Journal of Nephrology 2003 16 64 9 14733303
17. Francoeur R Slow nocturnal home hemodialysis at the Wellesley Hospital. Uldall ROM, Advances in renal replacement therapy 1996 3 133 6 8814919