Protozoan predation on nitrification performance and microbial community during bioaugmentation

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 23, 2011, Pages 10855-10860

  Yu, Lifang ^a   Peng, Dangcong ^a   Ren, Yongxiang ^a  

^a XI'AN UNIVERSITY OF ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Bioaugmentation; K r strategist; Microbial community; Nitrifiers; Protozoan predation

Indexed keywords

BIO-AUGMENTATION; LOW GROWTH RATE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NITRIFIERS; NITRITE-OXIDIZING BACTERIA; NITROBACTER; NITROSPIRA; PROTOZOAN PREDATION; SEED SOURCE; UPTAKE RATE;

AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; DENITRIFICATION; NITROGEN OXIDES; OXIDATION; PROTOZOA;

NITRIFICATION;

AMMONIA; NITRITE;

BACTERIUM; BIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; DOMINANCE; INHIBITION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NITRIFICATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PREDATION; PROTOZOAN; VULNERABILITY;

ARTICLE; GROWTH RATE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NITRIFICATION; NITRITE OXIDIZING BACTERIUM; NITROBACTER; NITROSPIRA; NONHUMAN; PREDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOZOON; REACTOR;

AMMONIA; ANIMALS; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; NITRIFICATION; NITROBACTER; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; QUATERNARY AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; SEWAGE; TIME FACTORS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

NITROBACTER; NITROSPIRA; PROTOZOA;

EID: 82455212050     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.060     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abeysinghe D.H., DeSilva D.G., Stahl D.A., Rittmann B.E. The effectiveness of bioaugmentation in nitrifying systems stressed by a washout condition and cold temperature. Water Environ. Res. 2002, 74:187-199.
2. AHPA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA. 20th ed.
3. Andrews J.H., Harris R.F. r- and K-selection ecology. Adv. Microb. Ecol. 1986, 9:99-147.
4. Blackburne R.J., Vadivelu V.M., Yuan Z., Keller J. Kinetic characterization of an enriched Nitrospira culture with comparison to Nitrobacter. Water Res. 2007, 41:3033-3042.
5. Bouchez T., Patureau D., Dabert P., Juretschko S., Doré J., Delgenès P., Moletta R., Wagner M. Ecological study of a bioaugmentation failure. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 2:179-190.
6. Dytczak M.A., Lonadary K.L., Oleszkiewicz J.A. Activated sludge operational regime has significant impact on the type of nitrifying community and its nitrification rates. Water Res. 2008, 42:2320-2328.
7. Fu S.Z., Fan H.X., Liu S.J., Liu Y., Liu Z.P. A bioaugmentation failure caused by phage infection and weak biofilm formation ability. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21:1153-1161.
8. Head M., Oleszkiewicz J. Bioaugmentation with nitrifying bacteria acclimated to different temperatures. J. Environ. Eng. 2005, 131:1046-1051.
9. Hommel, B., van der Zandt, E., Berends, D., Claessen, V., 2006. First application of the BABE process at 'S-Hertogenbosch WWTP. In: Proceedings WEFTEC 2006 [CD-ROM]. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Virginia.
10. Kim D., Kim S. Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitration reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics. Water Res. 2006, 40:887-894.
11. Lee N.M., Welander T. Influence of predators on nitrification in aerobic biofilm processes. Water Sci. Technol. 1994, 29:355-363.
12. Lee Y., Oleszkiewicz J.A. Effects of predation and ORP conditions on the performance of nitrifiers in activated sludge systems. Water Res. 2003, 37:4202-4210.
13. Li B.K., Irvin S., Baker K. The variation of nitrifying bacterial population sizes in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treating low, mid, high concentrated synthetic wastewater. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2007, 6:651-663.
14. Limbergen H., Top E.M., Verstraete W. Bioaugmentation in activated sludge: current features and future perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 50:16-23.
15. Magdalena A., Kathleen L., Oleszkiewicz A. Activated sludge operational regime has significant impact on the type of nitrifying community and its nitrification rates. Water Res. 2008, 42:2320-2328.
16. Ni B.J., Fang F., Xie W.M., Yu H.Q. Growth, maintenance and product formation of autotrophs in activated sludge: taking the nitrite-oxidizing bacteria as an example. Water Res. 2008, 42:4261-4270.
17. Nogueira R., Melo L.F. Competition between Nitrospira spp. and Nitrobacter spp. in nitrite oxidizing bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 95:169-175.
18. Parker, D.S., Wanner, J., 2007. Improving nitrification through bioaugmentation. In: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, pp. 740-765.
19. Ramalingam, K., Fillos, J., Carrio, L.A., 2005. Integrating separate centrate treatment with conventional plant operations for nitrogen removal. In: Proceedings of 9th Conference on Environmental Science and Technology [CD-ROM], Rhodes Island, Greece.
20. Salem S., Berends D., Heijnen J. Bio-augmentation by nitrification with return sludge. Water Res. 2003, 37:1794-1804.
21. Sanz J.L., Kochling T. Molecular biology techniques used in wastewater treatment: an overview. Process Biochem. 2007, 42:119-133.
22. Sekiguchi Y.S., Kamagata Y., Nakamura K., Ohashi A., Harada H. Florescence in situ hybridization using 16srRNA-targeted oligonucleotides reveals localization of methanogens and selected uncultured bacteria in mesophilic and thermophilic sludge granules. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65:1280-1288.
23. Shi X.Y., Sheng G.P., Li X.Y., Yu H.Q. Operation of a sequencing batch reactor for cultivating autotrophic nitrifying granules. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 101:2960-2964.
24. Smith R.C., Saikaly P.E., Zhang K., Thomatos S., Oerther D.B. Ecological engineering of bioaugmentation from side-stream nitrification. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57:1927-1933.
25. Vadivelu V.M., Yuan Z., Fux C., Keller J. The inhibitory effects of free nitrous acid on the energy generation and growth processes of an enriched Nitrobacter culture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:4442-4448.