Caesarean section for maternal request

Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 327-328

  Nzewi, Chuks ^a   Penna, Leonie K ^a  

^a KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT RIGHT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 82455198568     PISSN: 17517214     EISSN: 18793622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ogrm.2011.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. National Institute of Health state of the science conference statement; caesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 107:1386-1397.
2. Hannah M.E. Planned elective caesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?. CMAJ 2004, 170:813-814.
3. The National Sentinel Caesarean section Audit Report 2001, RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, RCOG Press, London.
4. Caesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 386:1209-1212. ACOG Committee Opinion.
5. Graham E.M., Ruis K.A., Hartman A.L., Northington F.J., Fox H.E. A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischaemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 2008, 199:587-595.
6. CG 13 Caesarean section: nice guideline http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10940/29331/29331.pdf.