Experimental evidence that women's mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity

Biology Letters

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 892-895

  Lee, Anthony J ^a   Zietsch, Brendan P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b QIMR BERGHOFER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Behavioural ecology; Environmental factors; Plasticity; Priming; Sexual selection; Sexual strategy

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; DISEASE PREVALENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SEXUAL SELECTION; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 82455192868     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0454     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Zahavi, A. 1975 Mate selection: selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205-214. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193 (75)90111-3)
2. Miller, G. 2000 The mating mind. New York, NY: Doubleday.
3. Haselton, M. G. & Miller, G. F. 2006 Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Hum. Nat. 17, 50-73. (doi:10. 1007/s12110-006-1020-0) (Pubitemid 43836821)
4. Swaddle, J. P. & Reierson, G. W. 2002 Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2285-2289. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2165) (Pubitemid 35397508)
5. Roberts, S. C. & Little, A. C. 2008 Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica 132, 309-321. (doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9174- 1)
6. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 2006 Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 131-144. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001) (Pubitemid 43246352)
7. Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T. & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. 2002 The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 947-955. (doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.82.6.947)
8. Boothroyd, L.G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M. & Perrett,D. I. 2007 Partner characteristics associated with masculinity, health and maturity in male faces. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 43, 1161-1173. (doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.008)
9. McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S. W., Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T. C., O'Rourke, M. T. & Thornhill, R. 2006 Romantic involvement often reduces men's testosterone levels-but not always: the moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. Interpers. Relat. Group Process. 91, 642-651. (Pubitemid 44600891)
10. Van Anders, S.M., Hamilton, L. D. & Watson, N. V. 2007 Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in North American men and women. Horm. Behav. 51, 454-459. (doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.002) (Pubitemid 46365694)
11. Gangestad, S.W. & Simpson, J. A. 2000 The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 573-644. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X 0000337X)
12. Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G. & Buss, D. M. 2006 Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychol. Inq. 17, 75-95. (doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1702-1) (Pubitemid 44672737)
13. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A. & Trivers, R. 2004 Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 355-370. (doi:10. 1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.002) (Pubitemid 41137045)
14. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L.M.&Little,A.C. 2010The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 2405-2410. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2184)
15. Brooks, R., Scott, I. M., Maklakov, A. A., Kasumovic, M. M., Clark, A. P. & Penton-Voak, I. S. 2011 National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 810-812. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0964)
16. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M. & Jones, B. C. 2011 Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in oppositesex faces. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2032-2039. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2010.1925)
17. Little, A. C., Cohen, D. L., Jones, B. C. & Belsky, J. 2007 Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 967-973. (doi:10.1007/s00265-006- 0325-7) (Pubitemid 46376517)
18. Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L. 2000 Studying the mind in the middle: a practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In Handbook of research methods in social psychology (eds H. Reis & C. Judd), pp. 253-285. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19. Duncan, L. A., Schaller, M. & Park, J. H. 2009 Perceived vulnerability to disease: development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 47, 441-546. (doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009. 05.001)
20. Jones, W. H., Russell, D. W. & Nickel, T. W. 1977 Belief in the paranormal scale: an instrument to measure beliefs in magical phenomena and causes. JSAS Catalogue Sel. Doc. Psychol. 7, 100.
21. Lassek, W. D. & Gaulin, S. J. C. 2009 Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30, 322-328. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav. 2009.04.002)
22. Simpson, J. A. & Gangestad, S. W. 1992 Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. J. Pers. 60, 31-51. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x)
23. Kruger, D. J. 2006 Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Pers. Relationships 13, 451-463. (doi:10.1111/j.1475- 6811.2006.00129.x) (Pubitemid 44973283)