Developing socioeconomic indicators for fisheries off Alaska: A multi-attribute utility function approach

Fisheries Research

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 117-126

  Seung, Chang ^a   Zhang, Chang Ik ^b  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b Pukyong National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Alaskan fisheries; Ecosystem based fisheries management; Holistic assessment; Multi attribute utility function; Socio economic indicators

Indexed keywords

EID: 82355182831     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Accadia, P., Spagnolo, M., 2006. Socioeconomic indicators for the Adriatic demersal fisheries. Paper Presented at 2006 International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET) Meetings, Portsmouth, UK, 9 pp.
2. Anderson L.G. A microeconomic analysis of the formation and potential reorganization of AFA Coops. Marine Resource Economics 2002, 17:207-224.
3. CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization). 2005. Ecological risk assessment for effects of fishing; case study instructions (19.09.05), vol. 8, 95 pp.
4. Degnobol P., Jarre A. Review of indicators in fisheries management-a development perspective. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2004, 26:303-326.
5. Felthoven R. Effects of the American Fisheries Act on capacity, utilization, and technical efficiency. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2002, 17:181-205.
6. Franquesa, R., 2001. Methodology and use of socio-economic indicators for managing fisheries, OECD fishing committee, AGR/FI(2001)12/Part 1.
7. Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., Punt A.E. Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing?. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2004, 62:540-551.
8. Garcia S.M., Staples D.J. Sustainability reference systems and indicators for responsible marine capture fisheries: a review of concepts and elements for a set of guidelines. Mar. Fresh. Res. 2000, 51:385-426.
9. General Accounting Office, 2000. Fishery management: American Fisheries Act produces benefits. Report to the Congress. GAO/RCED-00-176, Washington, D.C.
10. Hilborn R., Walters C. Differing goals of salmon management on Skeena River. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1977, 34:64-72.
11. Jennings S. Indicators to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries. Fish Fish. 2005, 6:212-232.
12. Keeney R. A utility function for examining policy affecting salmon in the Skeena River. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1977, 34:49-63.
13. Keeney R. The art of assessing multi-attribute utility functions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1977, 19:267-310.
14. Keeney R., Wood E. An illustrative example of the use of multi-attribute utility theory for water resource planning. Water Resour. Res. 1977, 13(4):705-712.
15. Keeney R., Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value radeoffs 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York, 569 pp.
16. Kim, D.H., Zhang, C.I., 2011. Developing socioeconomic indicators for an ecosystem-based fisheries management approach: an application to the Korean large purse seine fishery. Fish. Res., in press.
17. Kruse, G.H., Livingston, P., Overland, J.E., McKinnell, S., Perry, R.I. (Eds.), 2006. Report of the PICES/NPRB workshop on integration of ecological indicators of the North Pacific with emphasis on the Bering Sea. PICES Scientific Report No. 33, 109 pp.
18. Larkin P.A. Concepts and issues in marine ecosystem management. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1996, 6:139-164.
19. Link J.S. Translating ecosystem indicators into decision criteria. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2005, 62:569-576.
20. Logical Decisions Logical Decisions-Decision Support Software 2007, Fairfax, VA, 381 pp.
21. Marasco R.J., Goodman D., Grimes C.B., Lawson P.W., Punt A.E., Quinn T.J.I.I Ecosystem-based fisheries management: some practical suggestions. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2007, 64:1-12.
22. Matulich S.C., Sever M., Inaba F. Fisheries cooperatives as alternatives to ITQs: implications of the American Fisheries Act. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2001, 16:1-16.
23. National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultation-biological opinion: authorization of an Atka mackerel fishery under the BSAI groundfish fishery management plan between 1999 and 2002; authorization of a walleye pollock fishery under the Bering Sea/Aleutian Island groundfish fishery management plan between 1999 and 2002, and authorization of a walleye pollock fishery under the Gulf of Alaska groundfish fishery management plan between 1999 and 2002 1998, National Marine Fisheries Service, Juneau, AK.
24. National Marine Fisheries Service Revised final reasonable and prudent alternatives for the pollock fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian islands and Gulf of Alaska with supporting documentation. 1999, National Marine Fisheries Service, Juneau, AK.
25. National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation-Biological Opinion: Authorization of BSAI Groundfish Fisheries Based on TAC Specifications Recommended by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council for 2000; Authorization of GOA Groundfish Fisheries Based on TAC Specifications Recommended by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council for 2000; and Authorization of Both BSAI and GOA Groundfish Fisheries Based on Statutes, Regulations, and Management Measures to Implement the American Fisheries Act of 1998 1999, National Marine Fisheries Service, Juneau, AK.
26. National Research Council Decline of the Steller Sea Lion in Alaskan Waters: Untangling Food Webs and Fishing Nets 2003, National Academies Press, Washington D.C.
27. North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2002. Impacts of the American Fisheries Act. Anchorage, AK.
28. North Pacific Fishery Management Council Bering Sea Chinook Salmon Bycatch Management: Proposed Amendment 91 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 2008, North Pacific Fishery Management Council, Anchorage, AK.
29. North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2009. Pollock conservation cooperative and high seas catchers' cooperative. Preliminary Joint Annual Report, 2009, 23 pp. http://atsea.org/doc/PCCHSCCAnnRept11-30-09r1.pdf.
30. Sabatella E., Franquesa R. Studies and Reviews No. 73. General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. Manual of Fisheries Sampling Surveys: Methodologies for Estimations of Socio-economic Indicators in the Mediterranean Sea 2004, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 37 pp.
31. Seung, C., Zhang, C.I., 2008. Socioeconomic indicators used in ecosystem-based assessment for eastern Bering Sea trawl fishery. Paper Presented at 2008 PICES Meetings, Dalian, China, October 24-November 2, 2008, 31 pp.
32. The Research Group, 2007. Estimating Economic Impacts of Alaska Fisheries Using a Computable General Equilibrium Model-Data Acquisition and Reduction Task Documentation. Prepared for Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Corvallis, Oregon, 77 pp.
33. Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 1947, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 625 pp. 2nd ed.
34. Wilen, J.E., Richardson, E.J., 2008. Rent generation in the Alaskan pollock conservation cooperative. In: Townsend, R., Shotton, R., Uchida, H. (Eds.), Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 504. Rome, FAO. 361-368 pp.
35. Witherell D.W., Ackley D., Coon C. An overview of salmon bycatch in Alaska groundfish fisheries. Alaska Fish. Res. Bull. 2002, 9:53-56.
36. Zhang C.I., Marasco R. A review of the current status of ecosystem-based fisheries assessment and management. KAST Rev. Mod. Sci. Tech. 2008, 4:59-67.
37. Zhang C.I., Kim S., Gunderson D., Marasco R., Lee J.B., Park H., Lee J.H. An ecosystem-based fisheries assessment approach for Korean fisheries. Fish. Res. 2009, 100(1):26-41.