Revision of total ankle replacements

Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 176-188

  Besse, Jean Luc ^a,b,c   Bevernage, Bernhard Devos ^d   Leemrijse, Thibaut ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b Lyon University   (France)

^c CENTRE HOSPITALIER LYON SUD   (France)

^d Foot and Ankle Institute   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Complications; Revision; Total ankle replacement

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ACHILLES TENDON; ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY; ANKLE INSTABILITY; ANKLE RADIOGRAPHY; ARTHROLYSIS; ARTICLE; BONE CYST; BONE MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEBRIDEMENT; DEVICE REMOVAL; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; EXTERNAL FIXATOR; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; JOINT STIFFNESS; LIGAMENT SURGERY; METATARSAL BONE; METATARSAL OSTEOTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REPEAT PROCEDURE; REVISION SURGERY; TENODESIS; TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 82355175650     PISSN: 15360644     EISSN: 15381943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BTF.0b013e3182376f11     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Valderrabano V, Nigg BM, Von Tscharner V, et al. Total ankle replacement in ankle osteoarthritis: An analysis of muscle rehabilitation. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:281-291. (Pubitemid 46185024)
2. Valderrabano V, Pagenstert G, Horisberger M, et al. Sports and recreation activity of ankle arthritis patients before and after total ankle replacement. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:993-999. (Pubitemid 43725768)
3. Hintermann B, Valderrabano V. Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009;8:375-405.
4. Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Femino JE, et al. Total Ankle replacement: Why, when and how? Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:119-130.
5. Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Maffuli N. How successful are current ankle replacements? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:199-208.
6. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, et al. Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: Part 1: Range of motion. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24-12:881.
7. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, et al. Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: Part 2: Movement transfer. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24-12:888-896. (Pubitemid 38020207)
8. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, et al. Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle Talar movement. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:897-900. (Pubitemid 38020208)
9. Benedetti MG, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, et al. Functional outcome of meniscal-bearing total ankle replacement: A gait analysis study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98:19-26.
10. Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, et al. 257 ankle arthroplasties performed in Norway between1994 and 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:575-583. (Pubitemid 350034932)
11. Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: An analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007 78 569-574. (Pubitemid 350034931)
12. Skyttä ET, Koivu H, Eskelinen A, et al. Total ankle replacement: A population-based study of 515 cases from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:114-118.
13. Karantana A, Hobson S, Dhar S, The scandinavian total ankle replacement: Survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468-4:951-957.
14. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ. Twenty years evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. Clin Orthop. 2004;424:19-26. (Pubitemid 38890852)
15. Kofoed H. Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:73-79. (Pubitemid 38890859)
16. Kofoed. Reflection on total ankle replacement. "Pathologie du pied et de la cheville". Leemrijse TH, Valtin B. Elsevier Masson ed. Paris. 2009:390-392.
17. Ali MS, Higgins GA, Mohamed M. Intermediate results of Buechel Pappas unconstrained uncemented total ankle replacement for osteoarthritis. J Foot Ankle surg. 2007;46:16-20. (Pubitemid 46014471)
18. Carlsson A, Montgomery F, Besjakov P. Arthrodesis of the ankle secondary to replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19: 240-245. (Pubitemid 28210912)
19. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, et al. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899-1905. (Pubitemid 350195018)
20. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2143-2149. (Pubitemid 47606159)
21. Guyer AJ, Richardson G. Current concepts review: Total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:256-264. (Pubitemid 351170918)
22. Haskell A, Mann RA. Perioperative complication rate of total ankle replacement is reduced by surgeons experience. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:283-289. (Pubitemid 39096146)
23. Conti SF, Wong YS. Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop. 2001;391:105-114. (Pubitemid 32954054)
24. Crawford R, Sabokbar A, Wulke A, et al. Expansion of osteoarthritic cyst associated with wear debris. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80: 990-993. (Pubitemid 28528400)
25. Gabrion A, Jarde O, Havet E, et al. Arthrodesis of the ankle for failure of a total ankle replacement. Rev Chir Orth. 2004;90:353-359. (Pubitemid 38828440)
26. Guyer AJ, Richardson EG. current concepts review: Total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:256-264. (Pubitemid 351170918)
27. Spirt A, Assal M, Hansen S. Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2004;86:1172-1178. (Pubitemid 38724879)
28. Besse JL, Colombier JA, Asencio J, et al. l'AFCP Total Ankle arthroplasty in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96: 291-303.
29. Saltzman CL, Rashid R, Hayes A, et al. 4.5-gram monofilament sensation beneath both first metatarsal heads indicates protective foot sensation in diabetic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:717-723. (Pubitemid 38436713)
30. Vande Berg B, Lecouvet F, Malghem J, Imaging of the foot and the ankle: Instructions. "Pathologie du pied et de la cheville". Leemrijse TH, Valtin B. Elsevier Masson ed ISBN: 978-2-294-61208-4. Paris 3 novembre 2009:50-59.
31. Saltzman CL, el-Khoury GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16-9:572-576.
32. Greisberg J, Hansen S Jr. Ankle replacement: Management of associated deformities. Foot ankle clin. 2002;7:721-736.
33. Coetzee JC. Management of varus or valgus ankle deformity with ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13:509-520.
34. Hintermann B. Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Vienna: Springer-Verlag; 2005:195p.
35. Doets CH, Van der Plaat LW, Klein JP. Medial malleolar osteotomy for the correction of varus deformity during total ankle arthroplasty: Results in 15 ankles. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:171-177.
36. Alvine FG, Conti SF. The Agility ankle: Mid- and long-term results. Orthopade. 2006;35:521-526. (Pubitemid 43724212)
37. Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, et al. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty: Seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1161-1171. (Pubitemid 38724878)
38. Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, et al. The HINTEGRA ankle: Rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop. 2004;424:57-68. (Pubitemid 38890857)
39. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W. Scandinavian total ankle replacement: A 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients. Clin Orthop. 2004;424:47-56. (Pubitemid 38890856)
40. Wood PL, Prem H, Sutton C. Total ankle replacement: Medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:605-609. (Pubitemid 351685005)
41. Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, et al. Midterm results of the Salto total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:6-18. (Pubitemid 38898715)
42. Besse JL, Brito N, Lienhart C. Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES Total Ankle Replacement. Foot Ankle int. 2009;10:964-975. Erratum in: Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(12).
43. Koivu H, Kohonen I, Sipola E, et al. Severe periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after the Ankle Evolutive System total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:907-914.
44. Morgan SS, Brooke B, Harris NJ. Total ankle replacement by the Ankle Evolution System: Medium-term outcome. J Bone Joint Surg BR. 2010;92:61-65.
45. Hanna RS, Haddad SL, Lazarus ML. Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: Helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:921-926. (Pubitemid 47221795)
46. Rodriguez D, Bevernage BD, Maldague P, et al. Medium term followup of the AES ankle prosthesis: High rate of asymptomatic osteolysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;16:54-60.
47. Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Knupp M, et al. The Hintegra ankle: Short- and mid-term results. Orthopade. 2006;35:533-545. (Pubitemid 43724214)
48. Natens P, Dereymaeker G, Abbara M, et al. Early results after four years experience with the STAR uncemented total ankle prosthesis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2003;69:49-58. (Pubitemid 36313813)
49. Hennessy MS, Molloy AP, Wood EV. Management of the varus arthritic ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13:417-442.
50. Crock HV. The bones of the foot. In: Crock HV, ed. The blood supply of the lower limb bones in man. E & S Livingstore; 1967:72-79.
51. Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ, Urban RM, et al. Wear particles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:99-102.
52. Tulberg BN, Gonzales Della Valle A. What are the guidelines for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of preiprosthetic osteolysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(suppl 1):S20-S25.
53. Kitaoka HB. Salvage of nonunion following ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1991;268:37-43.