Ikiugu's eclectic method of combining theoretical conceptual practice models in occupational therapy

Australian Occupational Therapy Journal

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 437-446

  Ikiugu, Moses N ^a   Smallfield, Stacy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Eclectic methods; Theoretical models

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82255192233     PISSN: 00450766     EISSN: 14401630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00968.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bennett, S., Tooth, L., McKenna, K., Rodger, S., Strong, J., Ziviani, J. et al. (2003). Perceptions of an evidenced-based practice: A survey of Australian occupational therapists. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 13-22.
2. Craik, J. & Rappolt, S. (2003). Theory of research utilization enhancement: A model for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 266-275.
3. Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Depoy, E. & Gitlin, L. (2005). Introduction to research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies. Philadelphia: Mosby.
5. Gupta, J. & Rice, M. S. (2008). Building the profession on scholarship and engagement. Special Interest Section Quarterly: Education, March, 1-2.
6. Ikiugu, M. N. (2007). Psychosocial conceptual practice models in occupational therapy: Building adaptive capability. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
7. Ikiugu, M. N. (2010). Analyzing and critiquing occupational therapy practice models using Mosey's extrapolation method. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24, 193-205.
8. Ikiugu, M. N. & Smallfield, S. (2010). Interrater, intra-rater and internal consistency reliability of the theory application assessment instrument. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 57, 253-260.
9. Ikiugu, M. N., Smallfield, S. & Condit, C. (2009). A framework for combining theoretical conceptual practice models in occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 180-188.
10. Javetz, R. & Katz, N. (1989). Knowledgeability of theories of occupational therapy practitioners in Israel. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 664-675.
11. Kielhofner, G. (2009). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy (4th ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
12. Kristijanson, L. J., Tamblyn, R. & Kuypers, J. A. (1987). A model to guide development and application of multiple nursing theories. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12, 523-529.
13. Krueger, R. & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Law, M. & McColl, M. A. (1989). Knowledge and use of theory among occupational therapists: A Canadian survey. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 198-204.
15. Lee, J. (2010). Achieving best practice: A review of evidence linked to occupation-focused practice models. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24, 206-222.
16. Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. & Morgan, G. A. (2008). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (3rd ed.). New york: Taylor & Francis Group.
17. MacRae, A., Falk-Kessler, J., Julin, D., Padilla, R. & Schultz, S. (1998). Occupational therapy models. In: E. Cara & A. MacRae (Eds.), Psychosocial occupational therapy: A clinical practice (pp. 97-136). Albany, NY: Delmar.
18. McColl, M. A. (2003). The occupational therapy toolbox: Use of theory in occupational therapy. In: M. A. McColl, M. Law, D. Stewart, L. Doubt, N. Pollock, & T. Krupa (Eds.), Theoretical basis of occupational therapy (pp. 7-10). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
19. Metcalfe, C., Perry, S., Bannigan, K., Lewin, R. J. P., Wisher, S. & Klaber Moffatt, J. (2001). Barriers to implementing the evidence base in four NHS therapies. Physiotherapy, 87, 433-441.
20. Millerson, G. (1964). The qualifying associations: A study in professionalization. New York: Humanities.
21. Mortenson, W. B. & Oliffe, J. L. (2009). Mixed methods research in occupational therapy: A survey and critique. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 29, 14-23.
22. Mosey, A. C. (1996). Applied scientific inquiry in the health professions: An epistemological orientation (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
23. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Murphy, G. (2009). Using theory [Electronic version]. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. FindArticles.com. January 2009. Retrieved 22 January 2011 from.
25. Neistadt, M. E. (1995). Teaching strategies for the development of clinical reasoning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 676-684.
26. Norcross, J. C. & Beutler, L. E. (2000). A prescriptive eclectic approach to psychotherapy training. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 10, 247-261.
27. O'Neal, S., Dickerson, A. E. & Holbert, D. (2007). The use of theory by occupational therapists working with adults with developmental disabilities. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 21, 71-85.
28. Patterson, C. H. (1989). Foundations for a systematic eclectic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 26, 427-435.
29. Portney, L. G. & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Application to practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
30. Storch, B. A. & Eskow, K. G. (1996). Theory application by school-based occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 662-668.
31. Taylor, R. R., Fisher, G. & Kielhofner, G. (2005). Synthesizing research, education, and practice according to the scholarship of practice model: Two faculty examples. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 19, 107-22.