Flirting to rape: The influence of the traditional sexual script

Handbook on Gender Roles: Conflicts, Attitudes and Behaviors

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-32

  Clark, M Diane ^a   Carroll, Marjorie H ^b   Bartoli, Angela M ^c   Taylor, Melissa A ^d  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

^c SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82255168839     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.
2. Abbey, A., BeShears, R., Clinton-Sherrod, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Similarities and differences in women's sexual assault experiences based on tactics used by the perpetrator. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 323-332.
3. Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., & Ross, L. T. (1998). Sexual assault perpetration by college men: The role of alcohol misperception of sexual intent, and sexual beliefs and experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 167-195.
4. Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., Zawacki, T., Clinton, A. M., & Buck, P. O. (2001). Attitudinal, experiential, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 784-807.
5. Atmore, C. (1999). Victims, backlash, and radical feminist theory (or, the morning after they stole feminism's fire). In S. Lamb (Ed.), New visions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 183-211). New York: New York University Press.
6. Bartoli, A. M., & Clark, M. D. (2006). The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students. Sexuality and Culture, 10, 54-80.
7. Basile, K. (1999). Rape by acquiescence: The ways in which women 'give in' to unwanted sex with their husbands. Violence Against Women, 5, 1036-1058.
8. Bechhofer, L., & Parrot, A. (1991). What is acquaintance rape? In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 9-25). New York: Wiley.
9. Bondurant, B. (2001). University women's acknowledgment of rape. Violence Against Women, 7, 294-314.
10. Brener, N. D., McMahon, P. M., Warren, C. W., & Douglas, K. A. (1999). Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 252-259.
11. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
13. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459
14. Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the Traditional Sexual Script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. In E. S. Byers & L. F. O'Sullivan, (Editors), Sexual Coercion in Dating Relationships, (pp. 7 - 25). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
15. Byers, E. S., & Eno, R. (1991). Predicting men's sexual coercion and aggression from attitudes, dating history, and sexual response. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 4, 55-69.
16. Carroll, M. H., & Clark, M. D. (2006). Men's acquaintance rape scripts: A comparison between a regional university and a military academy. Sex Roles, 55, 469-480.
17. Chamberlain, C., Wright, R., Weikel, K., Clark, M. D., & Stefanisko, M. (1999, March). Relationships between sexual coercion and sexual preoccupation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Providence, RI.
18. Clark, M. D. (1997) Acquaintance rape scripts. In K. M. Ryan, (Chair), Sexual aggression and courtship violence. Symposium conducted at the 22nd Annual Feminist Psychology, Association for Women in Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA.
19. Clark, M. D., Bartoli, A. M., & Bordic, M. (1990, November). Similarities and differences in males and females dating scripts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
20. Clark, M. D., & Carroll, M. H. (2008). Acquaintance rape scripts of women and men: Similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 58, 616-625.
21. Clark, L., & Lewis, D. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto: The Woman's Press.
22. Craig, M. E., Kalichman, S. C., & Follingstad, D. R. (1989). Verbal coercive sexual behavior among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 421-434.
23. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
24. Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008a). Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 48-66.
25. Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008b). Perceptual mechanisms that characterize gender differences in decoding women's sexual intent. Psychological Science, 19, 348-354.
26. Farris, C., Viken, R. J., Treat, T. A., & McFall, R. M. (2006). Heterosocial perceptual organization: Application of the choice model to sexual coercion. Psychological Science, 17, 869-875.
27. Ferraro, K. F. (1996). Women's fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault? Social Forces, 75, 667-690.
28. Fischer, G. J. (1996). Deceptive, verbally coercive college males: Attitudinal predictors and lies told. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 527-533.
29. Fisher, B. S., & Sloan, J. J. (2003). Unraveling the fear of victimization among college women: Is the "shadow of sexual assault hypothesis" supported? Justice Quarterly, 20, 633-659.
30. Fisher, T. D., & Walters, A. S. (2003). Variables in addition to gender that help explain differences in perceived sexual interest. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 154-162.
31. Franiuk, R., Seefelt, J. L., & Vandello, J. A. (2008). Prevalence of rape myths in headlines and their effects on attitudes towards rape. Sex Roles, 58, 790-801.
32. Friedman, J., & Valenti, J. (2009). Yes means yes! Visions of female sexual power and a world without rape. Berkely, CA: Seal Press.
33. Gagnon, J. H. (1979). The interaction of gender roles and sexual conduct. In H. Katchadourian (Ed.), Human sexuality: A comparative and developmental approach (pp. 225-245). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34. Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 1-43.
35. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social origins of human sexuality. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
36. Gavey, N. J., McPhilips, K., & Braun, V. (1999). Interruptus coitus: Heterosexuals accounting for intercourse. Sexualities, 2, 35-68.
37. Hall, G. C. N, & Hirschman, R. (1991). Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 662-669.
38. Hartwick, C., Desmarais, S., & Hennig, K. (2007). Characteristics of male and female victims of sexual coercion. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 16, 31-44.
39. Hines, D. A. (2007). Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: A multilevel, multinational study of university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 403-422.
40. Jacques-Tiura, A. J., Abbey, A., Parkhill, M. R., & Zawacki, T. (2007). Why do some men misperceive women's sexual intentions more frequently than others do? An application of the Confluence model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1467-1480.
41. Kahn, A. S. (2004). What college women do and do not experience as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 9-15.
42. Kahn, A. S., Jackson, J., Kully, C., Badger, K., & Halvorsen, J. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 233-242.
43. Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53-66.
44. Kanin, E. (1985). Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 219-231.
45. Korman, S. K., & Leslie, G. R. (1982). The relationship between feminist ideology and date expense sharing to perceptions of sexual aggression in dating. The Journal of Sex Research, 18, 114-129.
46. Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193-212.
47. Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1988). Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 133-147.
48. Koss, M.P., Dinero, T.E., Siebel, C.A & Cox, S.L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1-24.
49. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
50. Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455-457.
51. Krahé, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). Adolescents' sexual scripts: Schematic representations of consensual and nonconsensual heterosexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 316-327.
52. LaPlante, M. N., McCormick, N., & Brannigan, G. G. (1980). Living the sexual script: College students' views of influence in sexual encounters. The Journal of Sex Research, 16, 338-355.
53. Lewin, M. (1985). Unwanted intercourse: The difficulty of saying no. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 184-192.
54. Littleton, H. L., & Axsom, D. (2003). Rape and seduction scripts of university students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles, 49, 465-475.
55. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
56. Lyndon, A. E., White, J. W., & Kadlec, K. M. (2007). Manipulation and force as sexual coercion tactics: Conceptual and empirical differences. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 291-303.
57. Masters, N. T., Norris, J., Stoner, S. A., & George, W. H. (2006). How does it end? Women project the outcome of a sexual assault scenario. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 291-302.
58. McCormick, N. B. (1987). Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 2, 3-27.
59. McCormick, N. B., & Jones, A. J. (1989). Gender differences in nonverbal flirtation. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, 15, 271-282.
60. Morr Serewicz, M. C., & Gale, E. (2008). First-date scripts: Gender roles, context, and relationship. Sex Roles, 58, 149-164.
61. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.
62. Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (1996). A cognitive ecological model of women's response to male sexual aggression in dating. Journal of Personality and Human Sexuality, 8, 117-139.
63. Osman, S. L., & Davis, C. M. (1999). Belief in token resistance and type of resistance as predictors of men's perceptions of date rape. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 24, 189-196.
64. O'Sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 234-243.
65. Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2006). Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: The role of aggressor gender and tactics. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 87-95.
66. Popovich, P. M., Jolton, J. A., Mastrangelo, P. M., Everton, W. J., & Somers, J. M. (1995). Sexual harassment scripts: A means to understanding a phenomenon. Sex Roles, 32, 315-335.
67. Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles scripts for a first date. Gender & Society, 3, 258-268.
68. Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499-509.
69. Rubenzahl, S. A., & Corcoran, K. J. (1998). The prevalence and characteristics of male perpetrators of acquaintance rape: New research methodology reveals new findings. Violence Against Women, 4, 713-735.
70. Russell, B. L., & Oswald, D. L. (2002). Sexual coercion and victimization of college men: The role of love styles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 273-285.
71. Ryan, K. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 237-245.
72. Seem, S. R., & Clark, M. D. (2006). Healthy women, healthy men and healthy adults: An evaluation of gender-role stereotypes in the 21st Century. Sex Roles, 55, 247-258.
73. Shotland, R. L., & Craig, J. M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior? Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 66-73.
74. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O'Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363-383). New York: Plenum.
75. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1995). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
76. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey [NCJ 183781]. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
77. Tyler, K. A., Hoyt, D. R., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1998). Coercive sexual strategies. Violence and Victims, 13, 47-61.
78. Zweig, J. M., Barber, B. I., & Eccles, J. S. (1997). Sexual coercion and well-being in young adulthood: Comparisons by gender and college status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 291-308.