The concept of practice in the English School

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 611-630

  Navari, Cornelia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BUCKINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

discourse; English School; norms; performativity; social practices

Indexed keywords

EID: 82255160663     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066110368143     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Barkin JS,Cronin B.The state and the nation: Changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations.International Organization. 1994;48 (1): 107-130.
2. Best GLaw and War since 1945. Oxford: Clarendon; 1994:.
3. Brown C (2002) The normative framework of post-Cold War international relations. In: Lawson S (ed.) The New Agenda for International Relations: Ten Years after the Wall. Cambridge: Polity, 147-163.
4. Bull H, Watson A (eds) (1984) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bull H (ed.) (1984) Intervention in World Politics. Oxford: Clarendon.
6. Butterfield H (1966) The balance of power. In: Butterfield H, Wight M (eds) Diplomatic Investigations. London: Allen and Unwin.
7. Butterfield H (1966) The new diplomacy and historical diplomacy. In: Butterfield H, Wight M (eds) Diplomatic Investigations. London: Allen and Unwin.
8. Clark ILegitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
9. Cronin BCommunity under Anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press; 1999:.
10. Cutler CAPrivate Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
11. Cutler C,Haufler V,Porter T.The Contours and Significance of Private Authority in International Affairs. 2001;:.
12. Doxey MInternational Sanctions in Comparative Perspective. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1987:.
13. Dunne T,Wheeler NJHuman Rights in Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
14. Gong GWThe Standard of 'Civilization' in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon; 1984:.
15. Jackson Preece JNational Minorities and the European Nation-State System. Oxford: Clarendon; 1998:.
16. James AMSovereign Statehood. London: Allen & Unwin; 1986:.
17. James A.The practice of sovereign statehood in contemporary international society.Political Studies. 1999;47:457-473.
18. Little RIntervention: External Involvement in Civil Wars. London: Martin Robertson; 1975:.
19. Makinda S.The United Nations and state sovereignty: Mechanism for managing international security.Australian Journal of Political Science. 1998;33:101-115.
20. Manning CAW (1972) The legal framework in a world of change. In: Porter E (ed.) The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969. London: Oxford University Press.
21. Mayall JNationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
22. Navari C (1996) English Machiavellism. In: Navari CB (ed.) British Politics and the Spirit of the Age, Political Concepts in Action. Keele: Keele University Press, 107-138.
23. Reus-Smit C.The constitutional structure of international society and the nature of fundamental institutions.International Organization. 1997;51:555-589.
24. Reus-Smit C.Liberal hierarchy and the license to use force.Review of International Studies. 2005;31:71-92.
25. Roberts A.Humanitarian war: Military intervention and human rights.International Affairs. 1993;69:429-449.
26. Thomas SMThe Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: the Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-first Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2005:.
27. Vincent JRNonintervention and International Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1974:.
28. Vincent JRHuman Rights and International Relations: Issues and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986:.
29. Watson ADiplomacy: The Dialogue between States. London: Routledge; 2004:.
30. Wheeler NJSaving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
31. Wight M (1966) 'Western values in international relations'. British Committee paper (October 1961). Later published in Butterfield H, Wight M (eds) Diplomatic Investigations. London: Allen and Unwin.
32. Wight M (1977) International legitimacy. In: Bull H (ed.) Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 153-173.
33. Williams J.Territorial borders, international ethics and geography: Do good fences still make good neighbours?.Geopolitics. 2003;8:25-46.
34. Zhang YChina in International Society since 1949. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1998:.
35. Adler E.The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO's post-Cold War transformation.European Journal of International Relations. 2008;14:195-230.
36. Armstrong DRevolution and World Order. Oxford: Clarendon; 1993:.
37. Bain WBetween Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
38. Best GHumanity in Warfare. New York: Columbia University Press; 1980:.
39. Bourdieu POutline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977:.
40. Bull HThe Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan; 1977:.
41. Buzan BFrom International to World Society: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
42. Dunne TInventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 1998:.
43. Finnemore M.Exporting the English School?.Review of International Studies. 2001;27:509-513.
44. Frost MCan Institutions Have Responsibilities?. Erskine T, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003:84-99.
45. Geertz CLocal Knowledge. New York: Basic Books; 1983:.
46. Giddens AThe Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984:.
47. Grader S.The English School of international relations: Evidence and evaluation.Review of International Studies. 1988;14:29-44.
48. Gray J (1988) 'Michael Oakeshott and the political economy of freedom'. World & I, www.worldandi.com/public/1988/September/mt6.cfm
49. Gray JLiberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy. London: Routledge; 1989:.
50. Gulick W.Prolegomena to a Polanyian theory of practice.Tradition and Discovery. 1998;XXV:6-12.
51. Jackson RThe Global Covenant. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
52. Jackson Preece J.National minority rights enforcement in Europe: A difficult balancing act.International Journal for Peace Studies. 1998;3 (2): 55-66.
53. Theorising International Society: English School Methods. Keene EdwardNavari C, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:104-124.
54. Keens-Soper MReason of States. Donelan M, ed. London: Allen & Unwin; 1978:25-44.
55. Keohane R.International theory: The three traditions.American Political Science Review. 1992;86:1112-1113.
56. MacIntyre AAfter Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Notre Dame Press; 1981:.
57. Manning CAW Nature of International Society. London: Macmillan; 1975:.
58. Minogue K.Michael Oakeshott as a character.Society. 2002;39:66-70.
59. Nardin TLaw, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1983:.
60. Neumann I (2001) 'The English School and diplomacy: Scholarly promise unfulfilled'. Paper presented to the Fourth ECPR IR Standing Group Conference, Canterbury, 10-12 September.
61. Neumann I.Returning practice to the linguistic turn: The case of diplomacy.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31:627-652.
62. Osiander AThe States System of Europe 1640-1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995:.
63. Pocock JGA (1968) Time, institutions and understanding. In: King P, Parekh BC (eds) Politics and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 209-237.
64. Pouliot V (2008) 'The materiality of practices: The case of contemporary Russian-Atlantic relations'. Paper presented to the Second World International Studies Association Conference, Ljubljana, 23-26 July.
65. Reckwitz A.Towards a theory of social practice.European Journal of Social Theory 5. 2002;:243-263.
66. Roberson BATheorising International Society: English School Methods. Navari C, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:189-208.
67. Schatzki TSocial Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
68. Schatzki TThe Site of the Social: A Philosophical Exploration of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Philadelphia, PA: Penn State University Press; 2002:.
69. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Schatski TKnorr-Cetina KVon Savigny E, ed. London & New York: Routledge; 2001:.
70. Smith S,Hollis MExplaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1990:.
71. Turner SThe Social Theory of Practices. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2000:.
72. Vigezzi BThe British Committee on the Theory of International Politics (1954-1985). Milan: Edizioni Unicopli; 2005:.
73. Waever O.International society - theoretical promises unfulfilled?.Cooperation and Conflict. 1992;27:97-128.
74. Warde A.Consumption and theories of practice.Journal of Consumer Culture. 2005;5:131-153.
75. Wenger ECommunities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
76. Wight MDiplomatic Investigations. Butterfield HWight M, ed. London: George Allen & Unwin; 1966:.
77. Wight MInternational Theory: The Three Traditions. Wight GPorter B, ed. Leicester and London: Leicester University Press; 1991:.
78. Wight MSystems of States. Bull H, ed. Leicester: Leicester University Press; 1977:.
79. Wilson PTheorising International Society: English School Methods. Navari C, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:167-188.