The hobo to doormen: The characters of qualitative analysis, past and present

Ethnography

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 518-542

  Wynn, Jonathan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

character; ethnographic method; identity; lifeworld; type

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155187215     PISSN: 14661381     EISSN: 17412714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1466138111410620     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Abbott A.Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School.Social Forces. 1997;75:1149-1182.
2. Abbott ADepartment and Discipline. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1999:.
3. Abbott A,Gaziano E. Transition and tradition: Departmental faculty in the era of the second Chicago School. The Second Chicago School. Fine GA, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1995:221-272.
4. Adler PWheeling and Dealing. New York: Columbia University Press; 1985:.
5. Almog O.The problem of the social type: A review.Electronic Journal of Sociology. 1998;:.
6. Anderson EA Place on the Corner. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1978:.
7. Anderson ECode of the Street. New York: W.W. Norton & Co; 2000:.
8. Anderson E.The ideologically driven critique.American Journal of Sociology. 2002;107:1533-1550.
9. Anderson NThe Hobo. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1923:.
10. Arditi J.Role as a cultural concept.Theory and Society. 1987;16:565-591.
11. Baker WE,Faulkner RR.Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry.American Journal of Sociology. 1995;97:279-309.
12. Bearman PDoormen. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2005:.
13. Becker HG.Constructive typology in the social sciences.American Sociological Review. 1940;5:40-55.
14. Becker HS.The professional dance musician and his audience.American Journal of Sociology. 1951;57:136-144.
15. Becker HS.Notes on the concept of commitment.American Journal of Sociology. 1960;66 (1): 32-40.
16. Becker HS. Introduction. The Jack Roller. Shaw C, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, v-xvii; 1966:.
17. Becker HSTricks of the Trade. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1998:.
18. Becker HS.The Chicago School, so-called.Qualitative Sociology. 1999;22:3-12.
19. Becker HS.Visual evidence: A seventh man, the specified generalization, and the work of the reader.Visual Studies. 2002;17:3-11.
20. Becker HS,Geer B,Hughes EC,Strauss ALBoys in White. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1961:.
21. Becker HS,Geer B,Reisman D,Weiss RSInstitutions and the Person. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1968:.
22. Boelen WAM.Street Corner Society revisited.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 1991;21 (1): 11-51.
23. Bourdieu PHomo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984:.
24. Brown-Saracino J (2010) A Neighborhood that Never Changes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Bulmer MThe Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity, and the Rise of Sociological Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1984:.
26. Burawoy M. The extended case method. Ethnography Unbound. Burawoy MBurton AFerguson AAFox KJ, ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1991:271-290.
27. Burgess EW.Sociological research methods.American Journal of Sociology. 1945;50:474-482.
28. Burgess EWThe Jack Roller. Shaw C, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1966:184-205.
29. Chapoulie J-M.Everett Hughes and the Chicago tradition.Sociological Theory. 1996;14:3-29.
30. Chapoulie J-M (2004) Using the history of the Chicago School Tradition for empirical research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 595: 157-167.
31. Cressey PThe Taxi-Dance Hall. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1932:.
32. Davis F.The cabdriver and his fare: Facets of a fleeting relationship.American Journal of Sociology. 1959;65:158-165.
33. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Denzin NLincoln Y, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2000:.
34. Donovan FThe Saleslady. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1929:.
35. Duneier MSidewalk. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux; 1999:.
36. Duneier M.Ethnography, the ecological fallacy, and the 1995 Chicago heat wave.American Sociological Review. 2006;71:683-692.
37. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Emerson RFretz RShaw L, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1995:.
38. Faris REL (1970) Chicago Sociology: 1920-1932. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. Faulkner RR. Improvising on sensitizing concepts. Ethnographies Revisited. Puddephatt AShaffir WKleinknecht S, ed. New York: Routledge; 2009:79-91.
40. A Case for the Case Study. Feagin JROrum AMSjoberg G, ed. Chapel Hill: North Carolina Press; 1991:.
41. Fine GAA Second Chicago School. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1995:.
42. Fine GAKitchens. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996:.
43. Fischer C, Strauss A (1978) The Chicago Tradition and Social Change: Thomas, Park and their successors. Symbolic Interactionism 1(2): 5-23.
44. Geertz CLocal Knowledge. New York: Basic Books; 1983:.
45. Geertz CThe Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books; 1993:.
46. Goffman EAsylums. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1961:.
47. Gold R.Janitors versus tenants: A status-income dilemma.American Journal of Sociology. 1952;57:486-493.
48. Grazian DBlue Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003:.
49. Hamilton, P. (1992) George Herbert Mead: Critical Assessments, Vol. 2. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.
50. Hammersley M,Atkinson PEthnography. London: Routledge; 1995:.
51. Handelman D.Symbolic types, the body, and circus.Semotica. 1991;85 (3/4): 205-225.
52. Harper D (1987) Working Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53. Hughes ECMen and Their Work. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press; 1958:.
54. Hughes EC. The study of occupations. Sociology Today. Merton RKBroom LCantrell LS, ed. New York: Basic Books; 1959:442-458.
55. Hughes EC (1970) The Humble and the Proud: The Comparative Study of Occupations. Sociological Quarterly 11(2): 147-156.
56. Hughes ECThe Sociological Eye: Selected Papers. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton; 1971:.
57. Hughes EC. Epilogue: Park and the department of sociology. Robert E. Park. Raushenbush W, ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1979:178-192.
58. Irwin JThe Felon. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1970:.
59. Junker BField Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1960:.
60. Katz J.Ethnography's warrants.Sociological Methods and Research. 1997;25:391-423.
61. Katz J.From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (part one).Ethnography. 2001;2:443-473.
62. Katz J.From how to why: On luminous description and causal inference in ethnography (part two).Ethnography. 2002;3:63-90.
63. Klapp O.Social types: Process and structure.American Sociological Review. 1958;23:674-678.
64. Linder RThe Reportage of Urban Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
65. Lofland JAnalyzing Social Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1971:.
66. Lofland J,Lofland LAnalyzing Social Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1995:.
67. Lofland L.The 1969 Blumer-Hughes talk.Urban Life and Culture. 1980;8:248-260.
68. Lortie DMaster's thesis. University of Chicago; 1949:.
69. Lortie DPhD dissertation. University of Chicago; 1958:.
70. McKenzie, RD (1923) The Neighborhood: a Study of Local Life in the City of Columbus, Ohio. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
71. McKinney JCConstructive Typology and Social Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966:.
72. Mills CW.The American business elite: A collective portrait.The Journal of Economic History. 1945;5:20-44.
73. Mills CW,Atkinson M.The trade union leader: A collective portrait.The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1945;9:158-175.
74. Park RE.The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment.American Journal of Sociology. 1915;20:577-612.
75. Park RE. Introduction. The Saleslady. Donovan F, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, vii-ix; 1929:.
76. Park RE,Burgess EIntroduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1921:.
77. Parsons TThe Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1951:.
78. Platt JA History of Sociological Research Methods in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
79. Psathas G.The ideal type in Weber and Schutz.Contributions to Phenomenology. 2005;53:143-169.
80. Rock PThe Making of Symbolic Interactionism. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield; 1979:.
81. Roy DF. The union-organizing campaign as a problem of social distance: Three crucial dimensions of affiliation-disaffiliation. Institutions and the Person. Becker HSGeer BRiesman DWeiss RS, ed. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1968:49-66.
82. Robert E. Park. Raushenbush W, ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1979:.
83. Schutz A.The stranger.American Journal of Sociology. 1944;49 (6): 499-507.
84. Schutz A.The homecomer.American Journal of Sociology. 1945;50 (5): 369-376.
85. Shaw CR (1930) The Jack-Roller. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
86. Simmel G. The stranger. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Wolff KH, ed. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press; 1950:402-409.
87. Simmel G.The poor.Social Problems. 1965;13:118-139.
88. Simmel G. The miser and the spendthrift. Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms. Levine DN, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1971:179-186.
89. Steinberg SPaper presented at the Eastern Sociological Society Meetings. 1993:.
90. Strong SM.Social types in a minority group: Formulation of a method.American Journal of Sociology. 1943;48:563-573.
91. Sutherland EHThe Professional Thief. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1937:.
92. Suttles G (1990) The Man Made City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
93. Thomas WIThe Unadjusted Girl with Cases and Standpoint for Behavior Analysis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1923:.
94. Thomas WI.The problem of personality in the urban environment.Publications of the American Sociological Society. 1925;XX:30-39.
95. Thomas WI,Znaniecki FThe Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1919:.
96. Thomas WI,Park RE,Miller HAOld World Traits Transplanted. New York: Henry Holt; 1921:.
97. Turner VWThe Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1967:.
98. Vidich AJ,Lyman SMAmerican Sociology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1987:.
99. Vidich AJ,Lyman SM. Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Denzin NLincoln Y, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1994:37-84.
100. Wacquant L.Scrutinizing the street: Poverty, morality, and the pitfalls of urban ethnography.American Journal of Sociology. 2002;107:1468-1532.
101. Whyte WFStreet Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1943 [1981]:.
102. Whyte WHThe City. New York: Doubleday; 1990:.
103. Winship C,Mandel MJ. Roles and positions: A critique and an extension of the blockmodeling approach. Sociological Methodology, 1983-1984. Leinhardt S, ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1983:314-345.
104. Wirth LThe Ghetto. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1925:.
105. Wirth L.Some Jewish types of personality.Publications of the American Sociological Society. 1926;32:90-96.
106. Wirth L (1938) Urbanism as a Way of Life. American Journal of Sociology 44: 1-24.
107. Wiseman JStations of the Lost. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1970:.
108. Wynn J (2011) The Tour Guide: Walking and Talking New York. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
109. Zorbaugh HWThe Gold Coast and The Slum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1929:.
110. Zorbaugh HW. The dweller in furnished rooms: An urban type The Urban Community. Burgess EW, ed. New York: Greenwood Press; 1968 [1925]:98-106.