Minds, brains, and norms

Neuroethics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 179-190

  Pardo, Michael S ^a   Patterson, Dennis ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

^b EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c and law in the military   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; Ethics; Insanity; Interpretation; Knowledge; Lie detection; Mens rea; Morals; Rule following

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; CRIMINAL LAW; DECEPTION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; OFFENDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIST;

EID: 82155186186     PISSN: 18745490     EISSN: 18745504     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-010-9082-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Pardo, Michael S.; and Dennis Patterson. forthcoming 2010. "Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience," Univ. of Illinois Law Review, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1338763.
2. Walter Glannon 2009 Our brains are not us Bioethics 23 321 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01727.x
3. Noë, Alva. 2009. Out of Our Heads.
4. Joshua Greene Jonathan Cohen 2004 For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soc'y London 359 1775 10.1098/rstb.2004.1546 (Pubitemid 39606385)
5. Bennett, Maxwell, and P.M.S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience, 68-74.
6. Joshua Greene Jonathan Haidt 2002 How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 517 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9 (Pubitemid 35430390)
7. Chorvat, Terrence, and Kevin McCabe. 2006. The Brain and the Law. In Law & the Brain, eds. Semir Zeki, and Oliver Goodenough, 128.
8. Alan G Sanfey, et al. 2006 Neuroeconomics: Cross-currents in research on decision-making Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 108 10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.009
9. Oliver R Goodenough 2001 Mapping cortical areas associated with legal reasoning and moral intuition Jurimetrics Journal 41 420
10. Bennett M.R.; and P.M.S. Hacker. 2008. A History of Cognitive Neuroscience.
11. John Mikhail 2009 Moral grammar and intuitive jurisprudence: A formal model of unconscious moral and legal knowledge Psychology of Learning and Motivation 50 27 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00402-7 28
12. Hauser, Marc D. 2006. Moral Minds 42.
13. John Mikhail 2007 Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 143 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007 148 (Pubitemid 46467491)
14. Baker, G.P.; and P.M.S. Hacker. 2005 Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning (Volume 1 of An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations) 185 (2d ed.; Revised by P.M.S. Hacker 2005).
15. Dennis Patterson 2006 Dworkin on the semantics of legal and political concepts Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 545 557 10.1093/ojls/gql017 (Pubitemid 44429646)
16. Bennett, Maxwell, and Peter Hacker. 2007. The Conceptual Presuppositions of Cognitive Neuroscience. In Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind and Language, eds. Maxwell Bennett, Daniel Dennett, Peter Hacker, and John Searle, 151.
17. Oliver R Goodenough 2001 Mapping cortical areas associated with legal reasoning and moral intuition Jurimetrics Journal 41 429 436
18. Patterson, Dennis. 1996. Law and Truth 71-98.
19. Quine, W.V. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 51-55. Columbia University Press.
20. Baker, G.P.; and P.M.S. Hacker. 1980. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning (Volume 2 of An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations). Blackwell, p. 667.
21. Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind, 25-61.
22. Hetherington, Stephen. 2006. How to Know (that Knowledge-That is Knowledge-How). In Epistemology Futures, ed. Hetherington, 71-94.
23. Bennett, M.R.; and P.M.S. Hacker. 2008. A History of Cognitive Neuroscience 96.
24. Bauby, Jean-Dominique. 1997. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.
25. Arizona, Clark v. 2006. 548 U.S. 735, 747.
26. Aharoni Eyal, et al. 2008 Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124 145 160 10.1196/annals.1440.007 (Pubitemid 351506784)
27. Erin Ann O'Hara 2004 How neuroscience might advance the law Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London 359 1677 1684 10.1098/rstb.2004.1541 (Pubitemid 39606376)
28. Lawrence A Farwell Sharon S Smith 2001 Using brain MERMER testing to detect knowledge despite effort to conceal Journal of Forensic Sciences 46 135
29. Giridharadas, Anand. "India's Novel Use of Brain Scans in Courts is Debated," NY Times, Sept. 14, 2008.
30. F Andrew Kozel, et al. 2005 Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging Biological Psychiatry 58 605 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.040 (Pubitemid 41565575)
31. DD Langleben 2002 Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study Neuroimage 15 727 10.1006/nimg.2001.1003 (Pubitemid 34852541)
32. Don Fallis 2009 What is lying? Journal of Philosophy 106 29
33. John Milton, et al. 2007 The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused Neuroimage 35 804 813 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.003 (Pubitemid 46400566)
34. George T Monteleone, et al. 2009 Detection of deception using fmri: better than chance, but well below perfection Social Neuroscience 4 528 10.1080/17470910801903530