Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 121-130

  Radicchi, Filippo ^a,b   Castellano, Claudio ^c,d  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

^c ISC CNR   (Italy)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Cross disciplinary comparisons; Normalized citation indicators

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155186133     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abbott A. Italy introduces performance-related funding. Nature 2009, 460:559.
2. Adler R., Ewing J., Taylor P. Citation statistics. Statistical Science 2009, 24:1-14.
3. Albarrán P., Crespo J., Ortuño I., Ruiz-Castillo J. The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates. Scientometrics 2011, 88:385-397.
4. Bornmann L. Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4:441-443.
5. Bornmann L., Daniel H.-D. Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants. Scientometrics 2006, 68:427-440.
6. Bornmann L., Daniel H.-D. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation 2008, 64:45-80.
7. 0 at the micro level using data from chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60:1664-1670.
8. Bornmann L., Wallon G., Ledin A. Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3480.
9. Castellano C., Radicchi F. On the fairness of using relative indicators for comparing citation performance in different disciplines. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 2009, 57:85-90.
10. Davis P., Papanek G.F. Faculty ratings of major economics departments by citations. American Economic Review 1984, 74:225-230.
11. de Andrés A. Evaluating research using impact and hirsch factors. Europhysics News 2011, 42:29-31.
12. Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006, 69:131-152.
13. Garfield E. The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006, 295:90-93.
14. Gilbert, N. (2008). Quality of UK research assessed.
15. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:16569-16572.
16. King D.A. The scientific impact of nations. Nature 2004, 430:311-316.
17. Kinney A.L. National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:17943-17947.
18. Leydesdorff L., Bornmann L. How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62:217-229.
19. Leydesdorff L., Bornmann L., Mutz R., Opthof T.i. Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technolog y 2011, 62:1370-1381.
20. Leydesdorff L., Opthof T. Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4:644-646.
21. Leydesdorff L., Shin J.C. How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62:1146-1155.
22. Lundberg J. Lifting the crown-citation z-score. Journal of Informetrics 2007, 1:145-154.
23. MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1989, 40:342-349.
24. Mahmoud H.M. Pólya urn models 2008, Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science.
25. Moed H.F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4:265-277.
26. Radicchi F., Castellano C. Rescaling citations of publications in physics. Physical Review E 2011, 83:046116.
27. Radicchi F., Fortunato S., Castellano C. Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:17268-17272.
28. Redner S. Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review. Physics Today 2005, 58:49-54.
29. Schubert A., Braun T. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics 1986, 9:281-291.
30. Schubert A., Braun T. Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 1996, 36:311-324.
31. Small H., Sweeney E. Clustering the science citation index: Using co-citations. Scientometrics 1985, 7:391-409. 10.1007/BF02017157.
32. Vinkler P. Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators. Scientometrics 1996, 36:223-236.
33. Vinkler P. Relations of relative scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 2003, 58:687-694.
34. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & van Raan, A. F. (2011). Universality of citation distributions revisited.
35. Zhou P., Leydesdorff L. Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing. Journal of Informetrics 2011, 5:360-368.
36. Zitt M., Small H. Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:1856-1860.