Sociology after fordism: Prospects and problems

European Journal of Social Theory

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 537-556

  Holmwood, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

crisis; critical sociology; Fordism; interdisciplinarity; post Fordism

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155176109     PISSN: 13684310     EISSN: 14617137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368431011417937     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abbott AThe System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988:.
2. Abbott AChaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2001:.
3. Barzelay MThe New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2000:.
4. Bell DThe End of Ideology: The Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. New York: Free Press; 1960:.
5. Bok DUniversities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2003:.
6. Boltanksi L,Chiapello EThe New Spirit of Capitalism. Elliott G, ed. London: Verso; 2005 [1999]:.
7. Burawoy M.for Public Sociology.American Sociological Review. 2005;70 (1): 2-28.
8. Caswill C,Wensley R.Doors and boundaries: a recent history of the relationship between research and practice in UK organizational and management research.Business History. 2007;49:293-320.
9. Collins R.Review of Andrew Abbott Chaos of Disciplines.Contemporary Sociology. 2002;31 (2): 230-3.
10. Dunleavy P,Hood C.From old public administration to new public management.Public Money and Management. 1993;14 (1): 9-16.
11. Etzkowitz H,Leydesdorff L.The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations.Research Policy. 2000;29 (2): 109-23.
12. Garfinkel H,Sacks HTheoretical Sociology. 1970) On the formal structures of practical action. In: McKinneyJ CTiryakianE A (eds) Theoretical Sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.McKinney J CTiryakian E A, ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1970:.
13. Gibbons M,Limosges C,Novotny H,Schwartzman S,Scott P,Trow MThe New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage; 1994:.
14. Gouldner A WThe Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London: Heinemann; 1970:.
15. Gouldner A WFor Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. New York: Basic Books; 1973:.
16. Guggenheim M,Novotny HSocial Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back Ahead. 2003) Joy in repetition makes the future disappear: a critical assessment of the present state of STS. In: JoergesBNovotnyH (eds) Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back Ahead. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Joerges BNovotny H, ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2003:.
17. Habermas JThe Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. McCarthy T, ed. London: Heinemann; 1984 [1981]:.
18. Hindess BPhilosophy and Methodology in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Brighton: Harvester; 1977:.
19. Hirshleifer J. The expanding domain of economics.American Economic Review. 1985;75 (6): 53-68.
20. Holmwood J. Sociology as professional practice and public discourse: a critique of Michael Burawoy.Sociological Theory. 2007;25 (1): 46-66.
21. Holmwood J.Sociology's misfortune: disciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and the impact of audit culture.British Journal of Sociology. 2010;61 (4):.
22. Horowitz I LThe Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994:.
23. Jasanoff S2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: JasanoffS (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.Jasanoff S, ed. London: Routledge; 2004:.
24. Jessop BThe Regulation Approach: Governance and Post-Fordism, Economy and Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 1995:.
25. Lane J-ENew Public Management. London: Routledge; 2000:.
26. Latour BReassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
27. Lazarsfeld P F,Rosenberg MThe Language of Social Research. 1955) General introduction. In: Lazarsfeld PFRosenbergM (eds) The Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Lazarsfeld P FRosenberg M, ed. New York: Free Press; 1955:.
28. Lyotard J-FThe Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Bennington GMassumi B., ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1984 [1979]:.
29. Marginson S,Considine MThe Enterprise University: Power, Governance, and Reinvention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000:.
30. Merton R KSocial Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press; 1968 [1949]:.
31. Mills C WThe Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press; 1959:.
32. Novotny H,Scott P,Gibbons MRe-Thinking Science. Cambridge: Polity; 2001:.
33. Novotny H,Scott P,Gibbons M.Introduction: 'Mode 2' revisited: the new production of knowledge.Minerva. 2003;41 (3): 179-94.
34. Parsons TThe Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press; 1937:.
35. Parsons TEssays in Sociological Theory. 1954 [1950]) The prospects of sociological theory. In: ParsonsT (ed.) Essays in Sociological Theory, rev. edn. New York: Free Press.Parsons T, ed. New York: Free Press; 1954 [1950]:.
36. Parsons T.Some problems confronting sociology as a profession.American Sociological Review. 1959;24 (4): 547-58.
37. Sacks H,Garfinkel HTheoretical Sociology. 1970) On formal structures of practical action. In: McKinney JCTiryakian EA (eds) Theoretical Sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 338-66.McKinney J CTiryakian E A, ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1970:338-66.
38. Savage M.Contemporary sociology and the challenge of descriptive assemblage.European Journal of Social Theory. 2009;12 (1): 155-74.
39. Savage M,Burrows R.The coming crisis of empirical sociology.Sociology. 2007;41 (5): 885-97.
40. Slaughter S Leslie,L LAcademic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997:.
41. Slaughter S,Rhoades GAcademic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press; 2004:.
42. StanleyL (2005) A child of its time: hybridic perspectives on othering in sociology.Sociological Research Online10(3). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/3/stanley.html.
43. Steinmetz GThe Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and its Epistemological Others. 2005) Scientific authority and the transition to post-Fordism: the plausibility of positivism in U.S. sociology since 1945. In: SteinmetzG (ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Steinmetz G, ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2005:.
44. Stinchcombe A L.Disintegrated disciplines and the future of sociology.Sociological Forum. 1994;9 (2): 279-91.
45. Therborn GScience, Class and Society. London: Verso; 1976:.
46. Thrift NKnowing Capitalism. London: Sage; 2005:.
47. Turner S P,Turner J HThe Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990:.
48. Weber M (1994 [1904]) 'Objectivity' in social science and social policy. In: Weber M The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Trans. Shils Ea and Finch H A. New York: Free Press.
49. Willer D,Willer JSystematic Empiricism: Critique of a Pseudo-Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1973:.
50. Woolgar S. What happened to provocation in science and technology studies?.History and Technology. 2004;20 (4): 339-49.
51. Woolgar S,Coopmans C,Neyland D.Does STS mean business?.Organization. 2009;16 (1): 5-30.