The facilitating factors and barriers encountered in the adoption of a humanized birth care approach in a highly specialized university affiliated hospital

BMC Women's Health

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Behruzi, Roxana ^a   Hatem, Marie ^b   Goulet, Lise ^b   Fraser, William ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARE AND CARING; CHILDBIRTH; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OBSTETRIC PROCEDURE; PATIENT CARE; PERSONNEL SHORTAGE; PRIVACY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RELIGION; SAFETY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIALIZATION; SPIRITUAL CARE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; ADOLESCENT; BIRTH; CANADA; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; FAMILY NURSING; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERINATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; CANADA; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; CULTURE; FAMILY NURSING; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PARTURITION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PERINATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; QUESTIONNAIRES; RELIGION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82055181617     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-53     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Rothman B. In labor: women and power in the birthplace. 1982, 320. New York: Norton, 1.
2. Davis-Floyd R. The technocratic body and the organic body: cltural models for women's birth choices. The Anthropology of Science and Technology 1992, 9:59-93.
3. Callister L. Cultural perceptions of childbirth:a cross-cultural comparison of childbearing women. Journal of Holistic Nursing 1996, 14(1):67-78.
4. Rothman B. Recreating motherhood: ideology and technology in a patriarchal. 1989, New York, Norton, 1.
5. Beckett K. Choosing cesarean: Feminism and the politics of childbirth in the United States. Feminist Theory 2005, 6(3):251-275.
6. Umansky L. Motherhood Reconceived: Feminism and the Legacy of the Sixties. 1996, New York: New York University Press.
7. SOGC A National Birthing Initiative for Canada 2008, SOGC., http://www.sogc.org/projects/birthing-strategy_e.asp
8. CIHI Highlights of 2008-2009 Selected Indicators Describing the Birthing Process in Canada 2010, CIHI., http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/childbirth_highlights_2010_05_18_e.pdf
9. Barbara D, et al. Fetal health surveillance: a community-wide approach versus a tailored intervention for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 2002, 165(5):469-474.
10. CPSS What Mother Says: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Public Health Agency of Canada 2008, CPSS.
11. PHAC Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report 2008, PHAC., http://www.publichealth.gc.ca/cphr/
12. CIHI Giving Birth in Canada: A Regional Profile. Canadian Institue for Health Information 2007, CIHI., http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/childbirth_aib_070725_e.pdf
13. Béhague D, Victora C, Fernado C. Consumer demand for cesarean section in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ 2002, 324:1-6. 1121932, 11777781.
14. Cindoglu D, Sayan-Cengiz F. Medicalization discourse and modernity: contested meanings over childbirth in contemporary Turkey. Health Care For Women International 2010, 31(3):221-243. 10.1080/07399330903042831, 20390649.
15. Lazarus E. What do women want: Issues of choice, control and class in pregnancy and childbirth?. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1994, 8(1):25-46.
16. Davis-Floyd R. Culture and birth: the technocratic imperative. Birth Gaz 1994, 11(1):24-5.
17. Klein MC, et al. The attitudes of Canadian maternity care practitioners towards labour and birth: many differences but important similarities. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009, 31(9):827-40.
18. Klein MC, et al. Attitudes of the new generation of Canadian obstetricians: how do they differ from their predecessors?. Birth 2011, 38(2):129-39. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00462.x, 21599735.
19. Backes D, Lunardi V, Lunardi WDF. [Hospital humanization as an expression of ethics]. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem 2006, 14(1):132-135.
20. Derfel A. Doctors pushing C-sections: studyVague guidelines give obstetricians leeway 2011, , http://www.montrealgazette.com/health/Doctors+pushing+sections+study/4743315/story.html
21. Hardon A, Boonmongkon P, Streefland P. Qualitative data collection techniques in applies health research Manual:anthropology of Health and Health care. Module 17 1994,
22. De Koninck M, et al. Comparing women's assessment of midwifery and medical care in Quebec, Canada. J Midwifery Womens Health 2001, 46(2):60-7. 10.1016/S1526-9523(01)00093-9, 11370691.
23. Maputle M. A model for women-centered childbirth. 2004, 197. University of Johannesburg: Johannesburg.
24. Stake R. The art of case study research. 1995, 175. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, xv, 175.
25. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 2002, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 3, xxiv. 598, [65].
26. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series 2003, 5:181. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 3, xvi, 181.
27. Parry D. We wanted a birth experience, not a medical experience: exploring Canadian women's use of midwifery. Health Care For Women International 2008, 29(8):784-806. 10.1080/07399330802269451, 18726792.
28. Jimenez V, et al. A mirage of change: family-centered maternity care in practice. Birth 2010, 37(2):160-7. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00396.x, 20557539.
29. Hausman BL. Risky business: framing childbirth in hospital settings. J Med Humanit 2005, 26(1):23-38. 10.1007/s10912-005-1050-3, 15926034.
30. Mitchell LM. Baby's first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects. 2001, Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
31. Henley-Einion A. The medicalization of childbirth. The Social Context of Birth 2009, Chapter 11:354. Radcliffe Publishing Ltd: Oxford, Caroline S.
32. Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Women's lived experience of fear of childbirth. Midwifery 2009, 25(2):e1-e9. 10.1016/j.midw.2007.01.017, 18164791.
33. Backes D, Koerich M, Erdmann A. Humanizing care through the valuation of the human being: resignification of values and principles by health professionals. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem 2007, 15(1):34-41.
34. Dzakpasu S, et al. The Canadian maternity experiences survey: design and methods. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2008, 30(3):207-216.
35. Mota RA. the role of health professionals in policies regarding hospital humanization. Psicologia em Estudo, Maringá 2006, 11(2):323-330.
36. Backes DS, Koerich MS, Erdmann AL. Humanizing care through the valuation of the human being: resignification of values and principles by health professionals. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2007, 15(1):34-41.