Continuously informing vibrotactile displays in support of attention management and multitasking in anesthesiology

Human Factors

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 600-611

  Ferris, Thomas K ^a   Sarter, Nadine ^b  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

alarm problem; multimodal information processing; physiological monitoring; simulation; sonification; tactile displays; tactile information processing; task management

Indexed keywords

ALARM PROBLEM; MULTI-MODAL INFORMATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING; SIMULATION; SONIFICATIONS; TACTILE DISPLAY; TACTILE INFORMATION; TASK MANAGEMENT;

ALARM SYSTEMS; ANESTHESIOLOGY; DISPLAY DEVICES; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; MULTITASKING; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY;

MICE (COMPUTER PERIPHERALS);

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TOUCH;

EID: 82055170511     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720811425043     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andre A. D., Wickens C. D. When users want what's not best for them. Ergonomics in Design. 1995 ; 3 (4). 10-14
2. Cooper J. B., Newbower R. S., Long C. D., McPeek B. Preventable anesthesia mishaps: A study of human factors. Anesthesiology. 1978 ; 49: 399-406 (Pubitemid 9077572)
3. FerrisT. (2010). Informative vibrotactile displays to support attention and task management in anesthesiology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
4. Ferris T., Sarter N. Supporting anesthetic monitoring through tactile display of physiological parameters. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd annual meeting ; 2009 ; 2009. 1664.
5. Ferris T., Sarter N. When content matters: The role of processing code in tactile display design. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 2010 ; 3: 199-210
6. Ferris T., Stringfield K., Sarter N. Tactile "change blindness" in detection of vibration intensity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th annual meeting ; 2010 ; 2010. 1316.
7. Fitch W. T., Kramer G. Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces. Kramer G., ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley ; 1994: 307-326.
8. Ford S., Daniels J., Lim J., Koval V., Dumont G., Schwarz S. K. W., Ansermino J. M. A novel vibrotactile display to improve the performance of anesthesiologists in a simulated critical incident. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2008 ; 106: 1182-1188 (Pubitemid 351450543)
9. Gaba D. M., Lee T. Measuring the workload of the anesthesiologist. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1990 ; 71: 354-361
10. Görges M., Staggers N. Evaluations of physiological monitoring displays: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2007 ; 22: 45-66
11. Grier R., Wickens C., Kaber D., Strayer D., Boehm-Davis D., Trafton J. G., St. John M. The red-line of workload: Theory, research, and design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd annual meeting ; 2008 ; 2008. 1204.
12. Hameed S., Ferris T., Jayaraman S., Sarter N. Using informative peripheral visual and tactile cues to support task and interruption management. Human Factors. 2009 ; 51: 126-135
13. Ho C.-Y., Nikolic M. I., Waters M. J., Sarter N. B. Not now! Supporting interruption management by indicating the modality and urgency of pending tasks. Human Factors. 2004 ; 46: 399-409 (Pubitemid 39506000)
14. Hodge B., Thompson J. F. Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet. 1990 ; 335: 891-894 (Pubitemid 20136788)
15. Imhoff M., Kuhls S. Alarm algorithms in critical care monitoring. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2006 ; 102: 1525-1537
16. Liu D., Görges M., Jenkins S. A. Collection of vital signs data for anesthesia monitoring research. Paper presented at the International Anesthesia Research Society annual meeting ; 2010 Honolulu, HI ; 2010.
17. Loeb R. G. Monitor surveillance and vigilance of anesthesia residents. Anesthesiology. 1994 ; 80: 527-533 (Pubitemid 24097683)
18. MacLean K. E. Foundations of transparency in tactile information design. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 2008 ; 1: 84-95
19. Ng J. Y. C., Man J. C. F., Fels S., Dumont G., Ansermino J. M. An evaluation of a vibro-tactile display prototype for physiological monitoring. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2005 ; 101: 1719-1724 (Pubitemid 41720627)
20. Sanderson P. M. The multimodal world of medical monitoring displays. Applied Ergonomics. 2006 ; 37: 501-512
21. Seagull F. J., Sanderson P. M. Anesthesia alarms in context: An observational study. Human Factors. 2001 ; 43: 66-78 (Pubitemid 32656533)
22. Seagull F. J., Wickens C., Loeb R. G. When is less more? Attention and workload in auditory, visual, and redundant patient-monitoring conditions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting ; 2001 ; 2001. 1395.
23. Sorkin R. D., Kantowitz B., Kantowitz S. Likelihood alarms. Human Factors. 1988 ; 30: 445-459
24. Walsh T., Beatty P. C. W. Human factors error and patient monitoring. Physiological Measurement. 2002 ; 23: R111 - R132
25. Watson M. O., Sanderson P. M. Sonification helps eyes-free respiratory monitoring and task timesharing. Human Factors. 2004 ; 46: 497-517
26. Wickens C. D. Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors. 2008 ; 50: 449-455 (Pubitemid 352029804)
27. Woods D. D. The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics. 1995 ; 38: 2371-2393