Haemodynamics and cardiac function during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in steep Trendelenburg position

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 408-413

  Haas, Sebastian ^a   Haese, Alexander ^a   Goetz, Alwin E ^a   Kubitz, Jens C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac function; Haemodynamics; Laparoscopic surgery; Trendelenburg position

Indexed keywords

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART; HEMODYNAMICS; LAPAROSCOPY; MERCURY COMPOUNDS; ROBOTIC SURGERY; UROLOGY;

CARDIAC FUNCTIONS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; HAEMODYNAMICS; HEART-RATE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; RIGHT VENTRICULAR FUNCTIONS; TRENDELENBURG POSITION;

BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART FUNCTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERFEROMETRY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 81955168036     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.410     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, et al. Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. Eur Urol 2009; 57: 735-746.
2. Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol 2009; 16: 4736-4741.
3. Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, et al. The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 438-443.
4. Sharma NL, Shah NC, Neal DE. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Br J Cancer 2009; 101: 1491-1496.
5. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. J Urol 2003; 170: 318-319.
6. Dorrington KL, Talbot NP. Human pulmonary vascular responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia. Pflugers Arch 2004; 449: 1-15.
7. Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, et al. Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 376-381.
8. Lenz RJ, Thomas TA, Wilkins DG. Cardiovascular changes during laparoscopy. Studies of stroke volume and cardiac output using impedance cardiography. Anesthesia 1976; 31: 4-12.
9. Shanewise JS, Cheung AT, Aronson S, et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 884-900.
10. Meluzín J, Spinarová L, Bakala J, et al. Pulsed Doppler tissue imaging of the velocity of tricuspid annular systolic motion: a new, rapid, and non-invasive method of evaluating right ventricular systolic function. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 340-348.
11. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification. American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee; Task Force on Chamber Quantification; American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee; American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography, European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006; 7: 79-108.
12. D'Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, et al. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 322-328.
13. 2 pneumoperitoneum for robotic-assisted prostatectomy: a trans-esophageal Doppler probe study. Int J Med Robot 2007; 3: 312-315.
14. 2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 433-439.
15. Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, et al. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45° Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg 2011; (in press).
16. Vincent JL, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Dopamine versus norepinephrine: is one better? Minerva Anestesiol 2009; 75: 333-337.