Comparison of patient outcomes in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 517-523

  Goode, Colleen J ^a   Blegen, Mary A ^b   Park, Shin Hye ^c   Vaughn, Thomas ^d   Spetz, Joanne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; HUMANS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SAFETY; PERSONNEL STAFFING AND SCHEDULING; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 81855226203     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182378b7c     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Scott L. It's all about the outcomes. Hosp Health Netw. 2010;22-26.
2. Department of Health and Human Services. Adverse events in hospitals: national incidence among Medicare beneficiaries. Office of Inspector General Daniel R. Levinson. OEI-06-06-0090. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
3. McClure M, Poulin M, Sovie M, Wandelt M. Magnet Hospitals: Attraction and Retention of rofessional Nurses. Kansas City, MO: American Nurses Association; 1983.
4. American Nurses Association. Scope and Standards for Nurse Administrators. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1995.
5. American Nurses Credentialing Center. The Magnet Model Components and Sources of Evidence: Magnet Recognition Program®. Silver Spring, MD: Author; 2008.
6. Aiken L, Havens D. The Magnet nursing services recognition program: a comparison of two groups of Magnet hospitals. Am J Nurs. 2000;100(3):26-35.
7. Upenieks V. Assessing differences in job satisfaction of nurses in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals.J Nurs Adm. 2002;32(1): 564-576. (Pubitemid 35375439)
8. Capuano T, Bokovoy J, Hitchings K, Houser J. Use of a validated model to evaluate the impact of the work environment on outcomes at aMagnet hospital. Health Care Manage Rev. 2005;30(3):229-236. (Pubitemid 41140566)
9. Brady-Schwartz D. Further evidence on the Magnet recognition program. J Nurs Adm. 2005;35(9):397-403.
10. Lake T, Friese C. Variations in nursing practice environments. Nurs Res. 2006;55(1):1-9.
11. Lacey S, Cox K, Lorfing K, Teasley S, Carroll C, Sexton K. Nursing support, workload, and intent to stay in Magnet, Magnet-aspiring and non-Magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2007;37(4):199-205.
12. Schmalenberg C, Kramer M. Essentials of a productive nurse work environment. Nurs Res. 2008;57(1):2-13.
13. Ulrich B, Buerhaus P, Donelan K, Norman L, Dittus R. Magnet status and registered nurse views of the work environment and nursing as a career. J Nurs Adm. 2007;37(5):212-220.
14. Trinkoff A, Johantgen M, Storr C, et al. A comparison of working conditions among nurses in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(7/8):309-315.
15. Kramer M, Maguire P, Brewer B. Clinical nurses in Magnet hospitals confirm productive healthy unit work environments. J Nurs Manage. 2011;19:5-17.
16. Aiken L, Smith H, Lake E. Lower Medicare mortality among a set of hospitals know for good nursing care. Med Care. 1994;32(8):771-787.
17. Aiken L, Sloane D, Lake E, Sochalski J, Weber A. Organization and outcomes of inpatient AIDS care. Med Care. 1999;37(8):760-772.
18. Mills A. Failure to rescue and pressure ulcer rates in Magnet hospitals compare to a matched set of non-Magnet hospitals. ANCC National Magnet Conference Presentation, October 16, 2008. Salt Lake City, Utah.
19. Carlson T. Patient Outcomes in Magnet, Magnet Aspiring and Non-Magnet Hospitals [dissertation]. Denver, CO: University of Colorado College of Nursing; 2009.
20. Lake E, Shang J, Klaus S, Dunton N. Patient falls: association with hospital Magnet status and nursing unit staffing. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33:413-425.
21. Dunton N, Gajewski B, Klaus S, Pierson B. The relationship of nursing workforce characteristics to patient outcomes. Online J Issues Nurs. 2007;12(3):1-17.
22. Hickey P, Gauvreau K, Connor J, Sporing E, Jenkins K. The relationship of nurse staffing, skill mix, and Magnet recognition to institutional volume and mortality for congenital heart surgery. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(5):226-232.
23. Blegen M, Goode C, Spetz J, Vaughn T, Park SH. Nurse staffing effects on patient outcomes: safety-net and nonsafety-net hospitals. Med Care. 2011;49(4):406-414.
24. Drenkard K, Wolf G, Morgan S. Magnet: The Next GenerationVNurses Making Difference. Silver Springs, MD: American Nurses Credentialing Center; 2011.
25. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Pankratz S, Leibson C, Stevens S, Harris M. Nurse staffing and inpatient hospital mortality. N Eng J Med. 2011;364 (11):1037-1045.
26. Drenkard K. The Magnet imperative. J Nurs Adm. 2009; 39 (7/8):S1-S2.