Nursing support, workload, and intent to stay in magnet, magnet-aspiring, and non-magnet hospitals

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 199-205

  Lacey, Susan R ^a,b   Cox, Karen S ^c   Lorfing, Kathleen C ^d   Teasley, Susan L ^e   Carroll, Cathryn A ^c   Sexton, Kathy ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c CHILDREN S MERCY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^e TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ADMINISTRATOR; NURSING; NURSING ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; WORKLOAD; WORKPLACE;

ACCREDITATION; ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN NURSES' ASSOCIATION; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HEALTH FACILITY ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; INTENTION; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ADMINISTRATORS; NURSING ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH; NURSING SERVICE, HOSPITAL; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PERSONNEL STAFFING AND SCHEDULING; PERSONNEL TURNOVER; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED STATES; WORKLOAD; WORKPLACE;

EID: 34147102437     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000266839.61931.b6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. McClure M. Magnet hospitals insight and issues. Nurs Adm Q. 2005;29(3):198-201.
2. McClure M, Poulin M, Sovie M, Wandelt M. Magnet Hospitals: Attraction and Retention of Professional Nurses. Kansas City, Mo: American Nurses Association; 1983.
3. American Nurses Association (ANA). Web site. Available at: www.nursingworld.org/ancc/magnet/index.html. Accessed February 5, 2006.
4. Scott JG, Sochalski J, Aiken L. Review of Magnet hospital research: findings and implications for professional nursing practice. J Nurs Adm. 1999;29(1):9-19.
5. Scope and Standards for Nurse Administrators. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association; 2004.
6. Magnet Recognition Program, Recognizing Excellence in Nursing Services. Application Manual. Washington, DC: American Nurses Credentialing Center; 2005.
7. Kramer M, Schmalenberg CE. Best Quality Patient Care. Nurs Adm Q. 2005;29(33):275-287.
8. Aiken LH, Patricia PA. Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: the Revised Nursing Work Index. Nurs Res. 2000;49(3):146-163.
9. Kramer M, Schmalenberg C. Development and evaluation of essentials of magnetism tool. J Nurs Adm. 2004;34(7-8):365-378.
10. Kramer M, Schmalenberg C. Essentials of magnetic work environment: part 1. Nursing. 2004;34(6):50-54.
11. Cox K. Individual Workload Perception Scale User's Manual. Kansas City, Mo: Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics; 2003.
12. Cox K, Teasley S, Zeller R, et al. Know staff's "intent to stay". Nurs Manag. 2006;37(1):13-15.
13. Norusis M. SPSS 12.0 Guide to Data Analysis. Illinois: Prentice Hall; 2004.
14. Keppel G. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1991.
15. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, et al. Nurses' report on hospital care in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(3):43-53.
16. Kramer M, Schmalenberg C. Development and evaluation of essentials of Magnetism tool. JONA. 2004;134(7/8):365-378.
17. Aiken LH. Improving quality through nursing. In: Mechanic D, Rogut LB, Colby DC, eds. Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press; 2005:177-188.
18. Needleman J, Buerhaus PI, Steward M, Zelevinsky K, Mattke S. Nurse staffing in hospitals: is there a business case for quality? Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(1):204-211.