Performance-based adaptive automation for supervisory control

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2059-2063

  Calhoun, Gloria L ^a   Ward, Victoria B R ^a   Ruff, Heath A ^b  

^a WRIGHT PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE   (United States)

^b Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE AUTOMATION; AUTOMATION CONDITIONS; AUTONOMY LEVELS; BALANCE OF SYSTEMS; COGNITIVE WORKLOADS; HUMAN INTERACTIONS; MULTIPLE AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; OPTIMAL OPERATORS; RESEARCH ISSUES; SITUATION AWARENESS; SUPERVISORY CONTROL; VEHICLE SIMULATION;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROL THEORY; ERGONOMICS; UNMANNED VEHICLES;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 81855217414     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551429     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Calhoun, G.L., Ruff, H.A., Draper, M.H., &Wright, E.J. (2011). Automation level transference effects in simulated multiple unmanned aerial vehicle control. Journal of Cognitive Engineering & Decision Making, 5(1), 55-82.
2. Cosenzo, K., Chen, J., Reinerman-Jones, L., Barnes, M., & Nicholson, D. (2010). Adaptive automation effects on operator performance during a reconnaissance mission with an unmanned ground vehicle. In Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society (HFES), pp. 2135-2139.
3. Cummings, M.L., Brzezinski, A.S., & Lee, J.D. (2007). The impact of intelligent aiding for multiple unmanned aerial vehicle schedule management. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(2), 52-59. (Pubitemid 46495745)
4. de Visser, E.J., LeGoullon, M., Freedy, A., Freedy, E., Weltman, G., & Parasuraman, R. (2008). Designing an adaptive automation system for human supervision of unmanned vehicles: A bridge from theory to practice. In Proceedings of the HFES, pp. 221-225.
5. Di Nocera, F., Lorenz, B., & Parasuraman, R. (2005). Consequences of shifting from one level of automation to another: main effects and their stability. In D. de Waard, K.A. Brookhuis, R. van Egmond, & T. Boersema (Eds.), Human Factors in Design, Safety, and Management (pp. 363-376). Maastricht, the Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.
6. Endsley, M. & Kaber, D. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42(3), 462-492. (Pubitemid 29074295)
7. Johnson, R., Leen, M., & Goldberg, D. (2007). Testing adaptive levels of automation (ALOA) for UAV supervisory control (Technical Report AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2007-0068), Air Force Research Laboratory.
8. Kaber, D.B. & Riley, J.M. (1999). Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3(3), 169-187.
9. Parasuraman, R., Cosenzo, K.A., & de Visser, E. (2009). Adaptive automation for human supervision of multiple uninhabited vehicles: Effects on change detection, situation awareness, and mental workload. Military Psychology, 21(2), 270-297.
10. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., & Wickens, C. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, Pt A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286-297.
11. Ruff, H.A., Narayanan, S., & Draper, M.H. (2002). Human interaction with levels of automation and decision-aid fidelity in the supervisory control of multiple simulated unmanned air vehicles. Presence, 11(4), 335-351.
12. Sheridan, T.B. & Parasuraman, R. (2006). Human-Automation Interaction. In R.S. Nickerson (Ed.), Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics (Volume 1, Chapter 2, pp. 89-129). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
13. Wilson, G. & Russell, C. (2007). Performance enhancement in an uninhabited air vehicle task using psychophysiologically determined adaptive aiding. Human Factors, 49(6), 1005-1018. (Pubitemid 350205837)