Human interaction with levels of automation and decision-aid fidelity in the supervisory control of multiple simulated unmanned air vehicles

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 335-351

  Ruff, Heath A ^a   Narayanan, S ^b   Draper, Mark H ^c  

^a Sytronics Inc   (United States)

^b WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION-AID FIDELITY;

DECISION MAKING; ERROR ANALYSIS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); REMOTELY OPERATED VEHICLES;

COMPUTER CONTROL;

EID: 0036703837     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105474602760204264     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bartholdi, J.J. (1996a). A routing system based on spacefilling curves. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
2. _. (1996b). Table of indices to support a routing system based on spacefilling curves. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
3. Billings, C.E. (1996). Human-centered aviation automation: Principles and guidelines (NASA TM 110381). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
4. _. (1997). Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Draper, M.H., Ruff, H.A., Repperger, D.W., & Lu, L.G. (2000). Multi-sensory interface concepts supporting turbulence detection by UAV controllers. Proceedings of the Human Performance, Situational Awareness and Automation Conference, p. 107-112.
6. Dunkler, O., Mitchell, C.M., Govindaraj, T., & Ammons, J.C. (1988). The effectiveness of supervisory control strategies in scheduling flexible manufacturing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-18, 223-237.
7. Ellis, S.H., McGreevy, M.W., & Hitchcock, R.J. (1987). Perspective traffic display format and air pilot traffic avoidance. Human Factors, 29(4), 371-382.
8. Endsley, M.R., & Kiris, E.O. (1994). The out-of-the-loop performance problem: Impact of level of automation and situation awareness. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 50-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Flach, J., Eggleston, R., Kuperman, G., & Dominguez, C. (1998). SEAD and the UCAV: A preliminary cognitive systems analysis. AFRL/HECI Technical Report. Dayton, OH: Wright Patterson Air Force Base.
10. Fulghum, D.A. (1997a, May 19). New control system sparks UAV success. Aviation Week and Space Technology, May, 40-41.
11. _. (1997b, June 2). Unmanned strike next for military. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 47-48.
12. Gawron, V.J. (1998). Human factors issues in the development, evaluation, and operation of uninhabited aerial vehicles. AUVSI '98: Proceedings of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, (pp. 431-438).
13. Hart, S.G., & Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
14. Haskell, I.D., & Wickens, C.D. (1993). Two-and three-dimensional displays for aviation: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(2), 87-109.
15. Kring, J.P. (2000). Workload and vigilance issues in the control of uninhabited aerial vehicles. University of Central Florida unpublished manuscript.
16. Lee, J.D., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategy, and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1243-1270.
17. Llinas, J., Bisantz, A., Drury, C., Seong, Y., & Jian, J. (1999). Studies and analyses of aided adversarial decision making. Phase 2: Research on human trust in automation. (Technical Report AFRL-HE-WP-TK-1999-0216). Wright Patterson AFB, OH: Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Crew System Interface Division, Air Force Material Command.
18. Maes, P. (1994). Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 31-40, 146. Masalonis, A.J., & Parasuraman, K. (1999). Trust as a construct for evaluation of automated aids: Past and future theory and research. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43rd Annual Meeting, 184-188. Santa Monica CA: HFS.
19. Maes, P. (1994). Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 31-40, 146. Masalonis, A.J., & Parasuraman, K. (1999). Trust as a construct for evaluation of automated aids: Past and future theory and research. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43rd Annual Meeting, 184-188. Santa Monica CA: HFS.
20. Narayanan, S., Edala, N.R., Geist, J., Kumar, P.K., Ruff, H.A., Draper, M., & Haas, M. (1999). UMAST: Awebbased architecture for modeling uninhabited aerial vehicles. Simulation, 73(1), 29-39.
21. Parasuraman, R., Bahri, T., Deaton, J., Morrison, J., & Barnes, M. (1990). Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems. (Technical Report No. CSL-N90-1). Washington, DC: Cognitive Science Laboratory, Catholic University of America.
22. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., Mouloua, M., & Hilburn, B., (1996). Monitoring of automated systems. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 91-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230-253.
24. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., & Wickens, C.D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automarion. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286-297.
25. Riley, V. (1994). A theory of operator reliance on automation. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human Performance in Automated Systems: Recent Research and Trends, (pp. 8-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Rouse, W.B. (1991). Design for success.' A human centered approach for designing suecessful products and systems. New York: Wiley.
27. Rouse, W.B., & Rouse, S.H. (1983). A framework for research on adaptive decision aids. (Technical Report AFAMRL-TR-83-082). WPAFB, OH: Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
28. Sarter, N., & Woods, D.D. (1992). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation: Operational experience with the flight management system. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2(4), 303-321.
29. _. (1994a). Decomposing automation: Autonomy, authority, observability, and perceived animacy. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human Performance in Automated Systems: Recent Research and Trends, (pp. 22-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. _. (1994b). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots' model and awareness of the flight management system. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4(1), 1-28.
31. Sheridan, T.B. (1980, October). Computer control and human alienation. Technology Review, 61-73.
32. _. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
33. _. (1996). Further musings on the psychophysics of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5, 241-246.
34. _. (1997). Supervisory control. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Human Factors and Ergonomics Handbook (pp. 1295-1327). New York: Wiley.
35. St. John, M., Cowen, M.B., Smallman, H.S., & Oonk, H.M. (2001). The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape-understanding versus relative-position tasks. Human Factors, 43(1), 79-98.
36. Vidulich, M.A., & Hughes, E.R. (1991). Testing a subjective metric of situation awareness. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 35th Annual Meeting, 1307-1311. Santa Monica, CA: HFS.
37. Vidulich, M.A., Ward, G.F., & Schueren, J. (1991). Using the subjective workload dominance (SWORD) technique for projective workload assessment. Human Factors, 33(6), 677-691.
38. Wickens, C.D. (2000). Imperfect and unreliable automation and its implications for attention allocation, information access, and situation awareness. (Technical Report ARL-00-10/NASA-00-2). Moffett Field, CA: NASAAmes Research Center.
39. Wickens, C.D., Mavor, A., & McGee, J.M. (1997). Flight to the future: Human factors in air traffic control. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
40. Wickens, C.D., Mavor, A., Parasuraman, R., & McGee, J.M. (1998). The future of air traffic control: Human operators and automation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41. Wiener, E.L. (1988). Cockpit automation. In E.L. Weiner & D.C. Nagel (Eds.), Human Factors in Aviation (pp. 433-461). San Diego: Academic Press.