The impact of dams on flood flows in the United States

River Research and Applications

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1192-1215

  Fitzhugh, Thomas W ^a   Vogel, Richard M ^b  

^a FitzHugh Consulting   (United States)

^b Tufts University   (United States)

Author keywords

Dams; Ecological flows; Environmental flows; Flood control; Floods; Hydrologic alteration; Hydrology

Indexed keywords

DAM; FLOOD; FLOOD CONTROL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION DENSITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RUNOFF; WATERSHED;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 81855185417     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1417     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C, Bryer M, Kottelat M, Bogutskaya N, Coad B, Mandrak N, Contreras Balderas S, W. Bussing W, Stiassny MLL, Skelton P, Allen GR, Unmack P, Naseka A, Ng R, Sindorf N, Robertson J, Armijo E, Higgins JV, Heibel TJ, Wikramanayake E, Olson D, López HL, Reis RE, Lundberg JV, Sabaj-Pérez MH, Petry P. 2008. Freshwater ecoregions of the World: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience 58(5): 403-414.
2. Alber M., 2002. A conceptual model of estuarine inflow management. Estuaries 25: 1246-1261.
3. Arora VK, Boer GJ. 2001. Effects of simulated climate change on the hydrology of major river basins. Journal of Geophysical Research 106: 3335-3348.
4. Asquith W. 2001. Effects of regulation on L-moments of annual peak streamflow in Texas. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4243.
5. [ASFPM] Association State of Floodplain Managers. 2003. No Adverse Impact: A Toolkit for Common Sense Floodplain Management. ASFPM: Madison, WI.
6. [ASFPM] Association of State Floodplain Managers. 2008. Natural and Beneficial Floodplain Functions: Floodplain Management-More than Flood Loss Reduction. ASFPM: Madison, WI.
7. [BASINS] Better Assessment Science Integrating Point Nonpoint Sources 2.0. 1999. Data CD from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
8. Bayley PB. 1995. Understanding large river-floodplain ecosystems. BioScience 45: 153-158.
9. Carlisle DM, Falcone J, Wolock DM, Meador MR, Norris RH. 2009. Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams. River Research and Applications 26 (2): 118-136.
10. Carson EC, Knox JC, Mickelson DM. 2007. Response of bankfull flood magnitudes to Holocene climate change, Uinta Mountains, northeastern Utah. GSA Bulletin 119(9/10): 1066-1078.
11. [CWCB-CDWR] Colorado Water Conservation Board and the Colorado Division of Water Resources, 2009. Colorado Decision Support Systems. Web address:
12. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Naeem S, Limburg K, Paruelo J, O'Neill RV, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
13. Daly C, Taylor G, Kittel T, Schimel D, McNab A. 2002. Development of a 103-Year High-Resolution Climate Data Set for the Conterminous United States. Comprehensive Final Report for 9/1/97-5/31/02 Submitted to NOAA Climate Change Data and Detection Program. Digital data available at:
14. FitzHugh TW. 2005. GIS tools for freshwater biodiversity conservation planning. Transactions in GIS 9: 247-263.
15. FitzHugh TW, Vogel R. 2010. Regression Methods and Data for Assessing Impacts of Dams on Flood Flows in the United States. [online] URL:
16. Gao Y, Vogel RM, Kroll CN, Poff NL, Olden JD. 2009. Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. Journal of Hydrology 374: 136-147.
17. Gebert WA, Graczyk DJ, Krug WR. 1987. Average annual runoff in the United States, 1951-80. U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA-710, scale 1:7, 500, 000. Digital data available at:
18. Graf WL. 2006. Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Geomorphology 79: 336-360.
19. Groves CG, Jensen DB, Valutis LL, Redford KR, Shaffer ML, Scott JM, Baumgartner JV, Higgins JV, Beck MW, Anderson MG. 2002. Planning for biodiversity conservation: putting conservation science into practice. Bioscience 52: 499-512.
20. Helsel D, Hirsch R. 2002. Statistical Methods in Water Resources. U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques of Water-Resource Investigations, 04-A3, 523 p.
21. th Century. Journal of Hydrology 278: 244-252.
22. Huh S, Dickey DA, Meador MR, Ruhl KE. 2005. Temporal analysis of the frequency and duration of low and high streamflow: years of record needed to characterize streamflow variability. Journal of Hydrology 310: 78-94.
23. Hutson SS, Barber NL, Kenny JF, Linsey KS, Lumia DS, Maupin MA. 2004. US Geological Survey Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000. USGS Circular 1268. (30 June 2004; ).
24. Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: 110-127.
25. Knox JC. 2000. Sensitivity of modern and Holocene floods to climate change. Quaternary Science Reviews 19: 439-457.
26. Kroll C, Luz J, Allen B, Vogel R. 2004. Developing a watershed characteristics database to improve low streamflow prediction. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2004: 116-125.
27. Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP. 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. W.H. Freeman: New York.
28. Lytle DA, Poff NL. 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 94-100.
29. Magilligan FJ, Nislow KH. 2001. Long-term changes in regional hydrologic regime following impoundment in a humid-climate watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Assocation. 37(6): 1551-1569.
30. Magilligan FJ, Nislow KH. 2005. Changes in hydrologic regime by dams. Geomorphology 71(1-2): 61-78.
31. Magilligan FJ, Nislow KH, Graber BE. 2003. A scale-independent assessment of discharge reduction and riparian disconnectivity following flow regulation by dams. Geology 31: 569-572.
32. Mathews R, Richter BD. 2007. Application of the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration Software in environmental flow setting. Journal of American Water Resources Association 43: 1400-1413.
33. [NCDC] National Climatic Data Center. 2009. Climate Maps of the United States, digital dataset, available at:
34. Piazza BP, La Peyre MK. 2007. Restoration of the annual flood pulse in Breton Sound, Louisiana, USA: habitat change and nekton community response. Aquatic Biology 1(2): 109-119.
35. Pielke JRA, MW Downton MW, Barnard Miller JZ. 2002. Flood damage in the United States, 1926-2000: a reanalysis of National Weather Service Estimates. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO.
36. Poff NL. 1996. A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale-dependence in some hydrological descriptors. Freshwater Biology 36: 71-91.
37. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime, a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47: 769-784.
38. Poff NL, Olden JD, Merritt MD, Pepin DM. 2007. Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 5732-5737.
39. Poff NL, Bledsoe BP, Cuhaciyan CO. 2006. Hydrologic variation with land use across the contiguous United States: geomorphic and ecological consequences for stream ecosystems. Geomorphology 79: 264-285.
40. Pyron M, Neumann K. 2008. Hydrologic alterations in the Wabash River watershed, USA. River Research and Applications 24: 1175-1184.
41. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
42. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10: 1163-1174.
43. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP. 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37: 231-249.
44. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Braun DP, Powell J. 1998. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 14: 329-340.
45. Richter BD, Warner AT, Meyer JL, Lutz K. 2006. A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications 22: 297-318.
46. Richter BD, Thomas GA. 2007. Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecology and Society 12(1): 12. [online] URL:
47. Sanborn SC, Bledsoe BP. 2006. Predicting streamflow regime metrics for ungauged streams in Colorado, Washington, and Oregon. Journal of Hydrology 325: 241-261.
48. Slack JR, Landwehr JM. 1992. Hydro-climatic data network: a U.S. Geological Survey streamflow data set for the United States for the study of climate variations, 1874-1988. U. S. Geological Survey. Open- File Report 92-129.
49. Stewart I, Cayan D, Dettinger M. 2005. Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America. Journal of Climate 18: 1136-1155.
50. [TCEQ] Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 2009. Water Availability Models. Website address:
51. Tockner K, Stanford JA. 2002. Riverine floodplains: present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29(3): 308-330.
52. Turnipseed DP, Ries KG III. 2007. The National Streamflow Statistics Program: estimating high and low streamflow statistics for ungaged sites. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2007-3010, 4 p.
53. [USACE-IWR] U.S., Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources 2000. Civil Works Floodplain Management Initiatives: Value to the Nation. Pamphlet 8 pp.
54. U.S., Census Bureau. 2009. Website address
55. [USGS NWIS] U.S., Geological Survey National Water Information System. 2009. website address:
56. Vogel RM, Wilson I, Daly C. 1999. Regional regression models of annual streamflow for the United States. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 125: 148-157.
57. Vogel RM, Sieber J, Archfield SA, Smith MP, Apse CD, Huber-Lee A. 2007. Relations among storage, yield and instream flow. 2007. Water Resources Research 43 doi: 10.1029/2006WR005226, 2007.
58. Wilding TK, Poff NL. 2008. Flow-ecology relationships for the watershed flow evaluation tool. Colorado Water Conservation Board, in Camp Dressser & McKee Inc., Bledsoe BD. Miller WJ. Poff NL. Sanderson JS. Wilding TK. 2009. Watershed Flow Evaluation Tool pilot study for Roaring Fork and Fountain Creek watersheds and site-specific quantification pilot study for Roaring Fork watershed (draft). Colorado Water Conservation Board, Denver, Colorado, USA (Appendix B).
59. Wolock DM. 1997. STATSGO soil characteristics for the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-656, digital data set, available at:
60. Wolock DM. 2003. Hydrologic Landscape Regions of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-145, digital data set, available at: