Predicting health-utility scores from the cervical spine outcomes questionnaire in a multicenter nationwide study of anterior cervical spine surgery

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 25, 2011, Pages 2211-2216

  Skolasky, Richard L ^a   Carreon, Leah Y ^b   Anderson, Paul A ^c   Albert, Todd J ^d   Riley III, Lee H ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NORTON LEATHERMAN SPINE CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cervical spine; health utility; patient outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPINE OUTCOMES QUESTIONNAIRE; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NECK PAIN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 36; SHOULDER PAIN; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE SURGERY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COHORT STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81855185298     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318202a403     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guide to the Technology Appraisal Process. London, England : National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2004.
2. Bloom BS. Use of formal benefit/cost evaluations in health system decision making. Am J Manag Care 2004; 10 : 329-35.
3. Dickson M, Hurst J, Jacobzone S. Survey of pharmacoeconomic assessment activity in eleven countries. OECD Health Working Papers 2003;4. Available at: Http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/27/25/ 2955828.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2011.
4. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21 : 271-92.
5. Payakachat N, Summers KH, Pleil AM, et al. Predicting EQ-5D utility scores from the 25-item National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Qual Life Res 2009; 18 : 801-13.
6. Ara R, Brazier J. Predicting the short form-6D preference-based index using the eight mean short form-36 health dimension scores: Estimating preference-based health-related utilities when patient level data are not available. Value Health 2009; 12 : 346-53.
7. Brazier J, Czoski-Murray C, Roberts J, et al. Estimation of a preference-based index from a condition-specific measure: The King's Health Questionnaire. Med Decis Making 2008; 28 : 113-26.
8. Guilfoyle MR, Seeley H, Laing RJ. The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease-validation against condition-specific measures. Br J Neurosurg 2009; 23 : 401-5.
9. BenDebba M, Heller J, Ducker TB, et al. Cervical spine outcomes questionnaire: Its development and psychometric properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27 : 2116,2123; discussion 2124.
10. Geisser S. Perturbation analysis. In: Predictive Inference: An Introduction. New York, NY : Chapman & Hall, 1993 : 129-53.
11. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physicaland mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31 : 247-63.
12. The University of Sheffield. About the SF-6D. Available at: Http:// www.shef.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/mvh/sf-6d. Accessed on 11 June 2010.
13. Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care 2005; 43 : 736-49.
14. Austin PC. A comparison of methods for analyzing health-related quality-of-life measures. Value Health 2002; 5 : 329-37.
15. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, McDonough CM, et al. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 : 2085-9.