Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of late initiation of prenatal care

Maternal and Child Health Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1067-1075

  Beeckman, Katrien ^a   Louckx, Fred ^a   Putman, Koen ^b  

^a FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Belgium)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Health behavior model; Initiation of care; Pregnancy (Mesh); Prenatal care (Mesh); Socioeconomic factors (Mesh)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIAL CLASS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; BELGIUM; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIAL CLASS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81855184591     PISSN: 10927875     EISSN: 15736628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-010-0652-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Villar, J., & Bergsjo, P. (1997). Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. I. Philosophy, recent studies, and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal outcomes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 76, 1-14. (Pubitemid 27050965)
2. Wildman, K., Blondel, B., Nijhuis, J., Defoort, P., & Bakoula, C. (2003). European indicators of health care during pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 111(Suppl 1), S53-S65.
3. Kirkham, C., Harris, S., & Grzybowski, S. (2005). Evidencebased prenatal care: Part I. General prenatal care and counseling issues. American Family Physician, 71, 1307-1316.
4. World Health Organization. (2006) Provision of effective antenatal care. http://who.int/reproductive-health/publications/maternal-newborn.en.html. [cited 2008 Nov 26]
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2008) Antenatal care. Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. http://www.nice.org.uk/. March [cited 2008 Nov 26]
6. Sunil, T. S., Spears, W. D., Hook, L., Castillo, J., & Torres, C. (2010). Initiation of and barriers to prenatal care use among lowincome women in San Antonio, Texas. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14, 133-140.
7. Park, J. H., Vincent, D., & Hastings-Tolsma, M. (2007). Disparity in prenatal care among women of colour in the USA. Midwifery, 23, 28-37.
8. Alderliesten, M. E., Vrijkotte, T. G., van der Wal, M. F., & Bonsel, G. J. (2007). Late start of antenatal care among ethnic minorities in a large cohort of pregnant women. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 114, 1232-1239. (Pubitemid 47414957)
9. Nothnagle, M., Marchi, K., Egerter, S., & Braveman, P. (2000). Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 4, 251-259.
10. Rowe, R. E., Magee, H., Quigley, M. A., Heron, P., Askham, J., & Brocklehurst, P. (2008). Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England. Public Health, 122, 1363-1372.
11. Kupek, E., Petrou, S., Vause, S., & Maresh, M. (2002). Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 265-273. (Pubitemid 37329300)
12. Quelopana, A. M., Champion, J. D., & Salazar, B. C. (2009). Factors predicting the initiation of prenatal care in Mexican women. Midwifery, 25, 277-285.
13. Johnson, A. A., Hatcher, B. J., El-Khorazaty, M. N., Milligan, R. A., Bhaskar, B., Rodan, M. F., et al. (2007). Determinants of inadequate prenatal care utilization by African American women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18, 620-636.
14. Gado-Rodriguez, M., Gomez-Olmedo, M., Bueno-Cavanillas, A., & Galvez-Vargas, R. (1997). Unplanned pregnancy as a major determinant in inadequate use of prenatal care. Preventive Medicine, 26, 834-838. (Pubitemid 27508657)
15. Roberts, R. O., Yawn, B. P., Wickes, S. L., Field, C. S., Garretson, M., & Jacobsen, S. J. (1998). Barriers to prenatal care: Factors associated with late initiation of care in a middle-class midwestern community. The Journal of Family Practice, 47, 53-61. (Pubitemid 28328786)
16. Pagnini, D. L., & Reichman, N. E. (2000). Psychosocial factors and the timing of prenatal care among women in New Jersey's Health Start program. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 56-64.
17. Daniels, P., Noe, G. F., & Mayberry, R. (2006). Barriers to prenatal care among Black women of low socioeconomic status. American Journal of Health Behavior, 30, 188-198. (Pubitemid 43471839)
18. Rowe, R. E., & Garcia, J. (2003). Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: A systematic review. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 25, 113-119. (Pubitemid 36758772)
19. LaVeist, T. A., Keith, V. M., & Gutierrez, M. L. (1995). Black/white differences in prenatal care utilization: An assessment of predisposing and enabling factors. Health Services Research, 30, 43-58.
20. Trinh, L. T., Dibley, M. J., & Byles, J. (2007). Determinants of antenatal care utilization in three rural areas of Vietnam. Public Health Nursing, 24, 300-310.
21. Ivanov, L. L. (2000). Use of a Western theoretical model to investigate the relationships among characteristics of pregnant women, utilization, and satisfaction with prenatal care services in St. Petersburg, Russia. Public Health Nursing, 17, 111-120.
22. Andersen, R., & Newman, J. F. (1973). Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and society, 51, 95-124.
23. Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 1-10.
24. What are equivalence scales? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2009 September 17. http://www. oecd.org. [cited 2009 Dec 9]
25. European Commission: Eurostat. (2009). National mean and median income by household type. European Commission: Eurostat 2009 December 16. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home. [cited 2009 Dec 7]
26. European Commission: Eurostat. (2009). Living conditions in 17% of EU27 population at risk of poverty. European Commission: Eurostat 2009 December 16. http://epp.eurostat.ec. europa.eu. [cited 2009 Dec 9]
27. Andridge, R. R., & Little, R. J. A. (2010). A review of hot deck imputation for survey non-response. International Statistical Review, 78, 40-64.
28. Fox-Wasylyshyn, S. M., & El-Masri, M. M. (2005). Handling missing data in self-report measures. Research in Nursing and Health, 28, 488-495. (Pubitemid 43257866)
29. StataCorp. (2005). Stata statiscial software: release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
30. Buekens, P., Kotelchuck, M., Blondel, B., Kristensen, F. B., Chen, J. H., & Masuy-Stroobant, G. (1993). A comparison of prenatal care use in the United States and Europe. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 31-36. (Pubitemid 23019067)
31. Downe, S., Finlayson, K., Walsh, D., & Lavender, T. (2009). 'Weighing up and balancing out': A meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116, 518-529.
32. Roberts, R. O., Bergstralh, E. J., Schmidt, L., & Jacobsen, S. J. (1996). Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 989-995. (Pubitemid 26319031)
33. De Gauquier, K., & Remacle, A. (2007). Prenatale zorg in België in 2005. Studie van het Intermutualistisch Agentschap. Brussel: IMA.