Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise base-isolated and conventional steel moment-resisting frame buildings

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 137, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1118-1131

  Sayani, Prayag J ^a,b   Erduran, Emrah ^b,c   Ryan, Keri L ^b,d  

^a Gandhi Engineering Inc   (United States)

^b Utah State University   (United States)

^c NORSAR   (Norway)

^d Reno   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceleration; Base isolation; Ductility; Nonlinear analysis; Performance characteristics; Response spectra; Seismic effects; Structural response

Indexed keywords

BASE ISOLATION; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; RESPONSE SPECTRA; SEISMIC EFFECT; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

ACCELERATION; BUILDINGS; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKES; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; RATING; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

BUILDING CODES;

EID: 81855173693     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000358     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agarwal, V. K., Niedzwecki, J. M., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2007). Earthquake induced pounding in friction varying base isolated buildings. Eng. Struct., 29 (11), 2825-2832. 0141-0296 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.026 (Pubitemid 47629843)
2. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2005). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC 341-05, Chicago
3. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-05, Reston, VA
4. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2007). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE 41, Reston, VA
5. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2008 a). Reducing the risks of nonstructural earthquake damage. ATC-69 Project Rep.-State of the Art and Practice, Prepared for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
6. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2009 a). Guidelines for Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings 50% Complete Draft, Prepared for Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC
7. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2009 b). Quantification of building seismic performance factors. ATC-63 Project Rep., FEMA P695, Prepared for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
8. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). (2004). NEHRP recommended provisions and commentary for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 450, Washington, DC
9. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y. (2008). NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s. Earthquake Spectra, 24 (1), 139-171. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.2857546
10. Ceccoli, C., Mazzotti, C., and Savoia, M. (1999). Non-linear seismic analysis of base-isolated RC frame structures. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 28 (6), 633-653. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199906)28:6<633::AID- EQE832>3.0.CO;2-3 (Pubitemid 29324424)
11. Charney, F. A. (2008). Unintended consequences of modeling damping in structures. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 134 (4), 581-592. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9445(2008)134:4(581) (Pubitemid 351394170)
12. Chiou, B., Darragh, R., Gregor, N., and Silva, W. (2008). NGA project strong-motion database. Earthquake Spectra, 24 (1), 23-44. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.2894831
13. Chiou, B. S.-J., and Youngs, R. S. (2008). An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 24 (1), 173-216. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.2894832
14. Dolce, M., and Cardone, D. (2003). Seismic protection of light secondary systems through different base isolation systems. J. Earthquake Eng., 7 (2), 223-250. 1363-2469 10.1142/S1363246903000882 (Pubitemid 37208867)
15. Dolce, M., Cardone, D., and Ponzo, F. C. (2007). Shaking-table tests on reinforced concrete frames with different isolation systems. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 36 (5), 573-596. 10.1002/eqe.642 (Pubitemid 46672018)
16. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2000 a). State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subjected to earthquake ground shaking. FEMA 355-C, Washington, DC.
17. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2000 b). State of the art report on connection performance. FEMA 355-D, Washington, DC.
18. Foutch, D. A., and Yun, S. (2002). Modeling of steel moment frames for seismic loads. J. Constr. Steel Res., 58 (5-8), 529-564. 0143-974X 10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00078-5 (Pubitemid 34635519)
19. Frankel, A. D. (2000). USGS national seismic hazard maps. Earthquake Spectra, 16 (1), 1-19. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1586079
20. Hall, J. F. (2006). Problems encountered from the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 35 (5), 525-545. 10.1002/eqe.541
21. Hall, J. F., and Ryan, K. L. (2000). Isolated buildings and the 1997 UBC near-source factors. Earthquake Spectra, 16 (2), 393-412. 8755-2930 10.1193/1.1586118
22. Hamidi, M., El Naggar, M. H., and Vafai, A. (2003). Response of structures supported on SCF isolation systems. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 32 (10), 1555-1584. 10.1002/eqe.289 (Pubitemid 37050147)
23. International Code Council (ICC). (2006). International Building Code (IBC), Falls Church, VA
24. Kelly, J. M. (1997). Earthquake-resistant design with rubber, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, London.
25. Kikuchi, M., Black, C. J., and Aiken, I. D. (2008). On the response of yielding seismically isolated structures. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 37 (5), 659-679. 10.1002/eqe.777 (Pubitemid 351516653)
26. Kim, K. D., and Engelhardt, M. D. (2002). Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames. J. Constr. Steel Res., 58 (5-8), 605-635. 0143-974X 10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00079-7 (Pubitemid 34635521)
27. Krawinkler, H. (1978). Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames. Eng. J. 0013-8010, 15 (3), 82-91. (Pubitemid 9396430)
28. Lee, K., and Foutch, D. (2002). Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 31 (3), 653-670. 10.1002/eqe.147 (Pubitemid 34140543)
29. Lin, A. N., and Shenton III, H. W. (1992). Seismic performance of fixed-base and base-isolated steel frames. J. Eng. Mech. 0733-9399, 118 (5), 921-941. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:5(921)
30. Lu, L. W., Wang, S. J., and Lee, S. J. (1988). Cyclic behavior of steel and composite joints with panel zone deformation. Proc. 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. IV, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo.
31. Naaseh, S., Morgan, T. A., and Walters, M. T. (2002). A critical evaluation of current US building code provisions and FEMA guidelines for the design of seismic isolated structures. Proc. ATC 17-2 Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control, Applied Technology Council, Los Angeles.
32. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES). (2009). Tools for isolation and protective systems (TIPS). http://www.neng.usu.edu/cee/faculty/ kryan/NEESTIPS/PBEE-study.html (Jul. 13, 2009).
33. Ordonez, D., Foti, D., and Bozzo, L. (2003). Comparative study of the inelastic response of base isolated buildings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 32 (1), 151-164. 10.1002/eqe.224 (Pubitemid 36022277)
34. Palazzo, B., and Petti, L. (1996). Reduction factors for base isolated structures. Comput. Struct., 60 (6), 945-956. 0045-7949 10.1016/0045-7949(95) 00428-9 (Pubitemid 126370844)
35. Pinto, P. E., and Vanzi, I. (1992). Base isolation: Reliability for different design criteria. Proc. 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2033-2038.
36. Politopoulos, I., and Sollogoub, P. (2005). Vulnerability of elastomeric bearing isolated buildings and their equipment. J. Earthquake Eng., 9 (4), 525-545. 1363-2469 10.1142/S136324690500202X (Pubitemid 41021999)
37. Ryan, K. L., and Polanco, J. (2008). Problems with Rayleigh damping in base-isolated buildings. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 134 (11), 1780-1784. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:11(1780)
38. Sayani, P. J., and Ryan, K. L. (2009). Comparative evaluation of base-isolated and fixed-base buildings using a comprehensive response index. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 135 (6), 698-707. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135: 6(698)
39. Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 132 (2), 244-252. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:2(244) (Pubitemid 43107241)
40. Shen, J., Kitjasateanphun, T., and Srivanich, W. (2000). Seismic performance of steel moment frames with reduced beam sections. Eng. Struct., 22 (8), 968-983. 0141-0296 10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00048-6 (Pubitemid 30306536)
41. Shenton III, H. W., and Lin, A. N. (1993). Relative performance of fixed-base and base-isolated concrete frames. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 119 (10), 2952-2968. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:10(2952)
42. Somerville, P., Anderson, D., Sun, J., Punyamurthula, S., and Smith, N. (1998). Generation of ground motion time histories for performance-based seismic engineering. Proc. 6th, U.S. National Conf. of Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
43. Taghavi, S., and Miranda, E. (2003). Response assessment of nonstructural building elements. PEER Rep. No. 2003-05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
44. Tsai, K. C., and Popov, E. P. (1988). Steel beam-column joints in seismic moment resisting frames. Rep. No. UCB/EERC-88/19, Earthquake Engineering Research Center (EERC), Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.