Shaking-table tests on reinforced concrete frames with different isolation systems

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 573-596

  Dolce, Mauro ^a   Cardone, Donatello ^a   Ponzo, Felice C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Passive seismic control; Rubber isolators; Seismic isolation; Shaking table; Shape memory alloys; Structural response

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; SHEAR STRESS;

PASSIVE SEISMIC CONTROL; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SHAKING TABLE;

STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

CONCRETE STRUCTURE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MODELING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHAKING TABLE TEST; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; VIBRATION;

EID: 34247640058     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.642     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Naeim F, Kelly JM. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures. Wiley: New York, 1999.
2. Dolce M. Passive control of structure. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, 1994.
3. Housner GW et al. Structural control: past, present and future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1998; 123(9):897-971.
4. Robinson WH. Lead-rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1982; 10(4):593-604.
5. Abe M, Yoshida J, Fujino Y. Multiaxial behaviors of laminated rubber bearings and their modelling. I: Experimental study. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130(8):1119-1132.
6. Zayas VA, Low SS, Mahin SA. The FPS earthquake resisting system: experimental report. Report No. UCB/EERC-87/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1987.
7. Wolff ED, Constantinou MC. Experimental study of seismic isolation systems with emphasis on secondary system response and verification of accuracy of dynamic response history analysis methods. Report No. MCEER-04-0001, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, 2004.
8. Chalhoub MS, Kelly JM. Earthquake simulator testing of a combined sliding bearing and rubber bearing isolation system. Report No. UCB/ EERC-87/04, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
9. Tsopelas P, Constantinou MC. Study of elastoplastic bridge seismic isolation system. Journal of Structural Engineering 1997; 123(4):489-498.
10. Constantinou MC, Soong TT, Dargush GF. Passive Energy Dissipation Systems for Structural Design and Retrofit, MCEER Monograph No. 1. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 1998.
11. Kelly JM. The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:3-20.
12. Johnson EA, Ramallo JC, Spencer BF, Sam MK. Intelligent base isolation systems. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, 1999; 367-376.
13. CEN, European Committee for Standardization. Technical Committee TC 340. Anti-seismic devices, prEN 15129.
14. CEN, European Committee for Standardisation. Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures, Part 1.1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, ENV1998-1-1, CEN, 1998.
15. Duerig TW, Melton KN, Stoeckel D, Wayman CM (eds). Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.: London, 1990.
16. Funakubo H. Shape Memory Alloys. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers: New York, 1987.
17. Cardone D, Dolce M, Nigro D, Ponzo FC. The behaviour of SMA isolation systems in a full-scale release tests. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, in press.
18. Shaw JA, Kyriakides S. Thermomechanical aspects of NiTi. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1995; 43(8):1243-1281.
19. V.A., Brite-Euram MANSIDE Project-Workshop Proceedings, National Seismic Survey, Rome, Italy, 1999.
20. Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R. Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(7):945-968.
21. Dolce M, Cardone D, Ponzo F, Valente C. Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Earthquake 2005; 34:1687-1717.
22. CEN, European Committee for Standardisation. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Building, ENV 1992-1-1, CEN, 1992.
23. Dolce M, Filardi B, Marnetto R, Nigro D. Experimental tests and applications of a new biaxial elastoplastic device for the passive control of structures. Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Joint Sealants and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, Sacramento, CA, 1996.
24. Prakash V, Powell GH, Campbell S. DRAIN-3DX: base program description and user guide. Report No. UCB/SEMM-94/07, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1994.
25. Dolce M, Cardone D. Seismic protection of light secondary systems through different base isolation systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 7(2):223-250.
26. FEMA356. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.
27. NZSEE, New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering. Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquake. Section 9: Detailed Assessment of Moment Resisting Frame Elements with Masonry Infill Panels, Draft, November 2005.
28. Kelly JM. The influence of base isolation on the seismic response of light secondary equipment. Report No. UCB/EERC-81/17, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.