Effects of combining field strengths on auditory functional MRI group analysis: 1.5T and 3T

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1480-1488

  Han, Kihwan ^a   Talavage, Thomas M ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

1.5T; 3T; data analysis; fMRI; ROC analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MUSIC; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL DETECTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE;

EID: 81755187315     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22823     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lawrence LN, Tanenbaum N,. 3T MRI in clinical practice. Appl Radiol 2005; 34: 8-17.
2. Belliveau JW, Kennedy DN, Weisskoff RM, et al. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science 1991; 254: 716-719.
3. Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 5675-5679.
4. Ogawa S, Tank D, Menon R, et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 5951-5955.
5. Thulborn KR, Chang SY, Shen GX, Voyvodic JT,. High-resolution echo-planar fMRI of human visual cortex at 3.0 Tesla. NMR Biomed 1997; 10: 183-190.
6. Paley M, Mayhew J, Martindale A, et al. Design and initial evaluation of a low-cost 3-Tesla research system for combined optical and functional MR imaging with interventional capability. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 87-92.
7. Kruger G, Kastrup A, Glover GH,. Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 595-604.
8. Turner R, Jezzard P, Wen H, et al. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 Tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 227-279.
9. Gati JS, Menon RS, Ugurbil K, Rutt BK,. Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38: 296-302.
10. Yang Y, Wen H, Mattay VS, Balaban RS, Frank JA, Duyn JH,. Comparison of 3D BOLD functional MRI with spiral acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T. Neuroimage 1999; 9: 446-451.
11. Van Horn JD, Toga AW,. Multisite neuroimaging trials. Curr Opin Neurol 2009; 22: 370-378.
12. Sutton BP, Goh H, Hebrank A, Welsh R, Chee MWL, Park DC,. Investigation and validation of intersite fMRI studies using the same imaging hardware. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 21-27.
13. Magnotta VA, Friedman L, FBIRN. Measurement of signal-to-noise and contrast-noise in the fBIRN multicenter imaging study. J Digit Imaging 2006; 19: 140-147.
14. Friedman L, Glover GH,. Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 827-839.
15. Friedman L, Glover GH, FBIRN. Reducing interscanner variability of activation in a multicenter fMRI study: controlling for signal-to-fluctuation- noise-ratio (SFNR) differences. Neuroimage 2006; 33: 471-481.
16. Friedman L, Glover GH, Krenz D, Magnotta VA, FBIRN. Reducing inter-scanner variability of activation in a multicenter fMRI study: role of smoothness equalization. Neuroimage 2006; 32: 1656-1668.
17. Friedman L, Stern H, Brown GG, et al. Test-retest and between-site reliability in a multicenter fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29: 958-972.
18. Bosnell B, Wegner C, Kincses ZT, et al. Reproducibility of fMRI in the clinical setting: implications for trial designs. Neuroimage 2008; 42: 603-610.
19. Suckling J, Ohlssen D, Andrew C, et al. Components of variance in a multicentre functional MRI study and implications for calculation of statistical power. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29: 1111-1122.
20. Suckling J, Barnes A, Job D, et al. Power calculation for multicenter imaging studies controlled by the false discovery rate. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 1183-1195.
21. Talavage TM, Ledden PJ, Benson RR, Rosen BR, Melcher JR,. Frequency-dependent responses exhibited by multiple regions in human auditory cortex. Hear Res 2000; 150: 225-244.
22. Cox RW,. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996; 29: 162-173.
23. Talairach J, Tournoux P,. Co-planar sterotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme Medical; 1998.
24. Friston KJ, Holmes A, Worsley K, Poline J, Frith C, Frackowiak R,. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 1995; 2: 189-210.
25. Glover GH,. Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 1999; 9; 416-429.
26. Penny WD, Holmes AP,. Random effects analysis. In:, Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Kiebel S, Nichols T, Penny WD, editors. Statistical parametric mapping. London: Academic Press; 2007. p 156-165.
27. Fawcett T,. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 2006; 27: 861-874.
28. Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Hoogenraad FG, Sprenger M, Scheltens P,. Within-subject reproducibility of visual activation patterns with functional magnetic resonance imaging using multislice echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16: 105-113.
29. Gonzalez Castillo J, Talavage TM,. Reproducibility of fMRI activations associated with auditory sentence comprehension. Neuroimage 2011; 54: 2138-2155.
30. Olulade O, Hu S, Tamer GG, Luh WM, Talavage TM,. State- dependence of fMRI auditory cortex responses to desired and undesired acoustic stimuli. In: Proc 16th Annual Meeting Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Barcelona, Spain, June, 2010 (abstract 2444).
31. Krasnow B, Tamm L, Greicius MD, et al. Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing. Neuroimage 2003; 18: 813-826.
32. Greve D, Mueller B, Brown G, Liu T, Glover GH, FBIRN. Processing methods to reduce intersite variability in fMRI. In: Proc 16th Annual Meeting Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Barcelona, Spain, June, 2010 (abstract 1318).
33. Howseman AM, Grootoonk S, Porter DA, Ramdeen J, Holmes AP, Turner R,. The effect of slice order and thickness on fMRI activation data using multislice echo-planar imaging. Neuroimage 1999; 9: 363-376.
34. Aron AR, Gluck MA, Poldrack RA,. Long-term test-retest reliability of functional MRI in a classification learning task. Neuroimage 2006; 29: 1000-1006.