Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of caesarean delivery rates in low-risk deliveries

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2011, Pages

  Stivanello, Elisa ^a   Rucci, Paola ^a   Carretta, Elisa ^a   Pieri, Giulia ^a   Seghieri, Chiara ^b   Nuti, Sabina ^b   Declercq, Eugene ^c   Taglioni, Martina ^d   Fantini, Maria Pia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH CERTIFICATE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIAGE; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PARITY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL STATUS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS;

EMILIA;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; ITALY; PREGNANCY; RISK ADJUSTMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 81755176112     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028060     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Belizan J, Althabe F, Cafferata ML, (2007) Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates. Epidemiology 18: 485-486.
2. Chaillet N, Dumont A, (2007) Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth 34: 53-64.
3. Main EK, Bingham D, (2008) Quality improvement in maternity care: promising approaches from the medical and public health perspectives. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 20: 574-80.
4. Main EK, Moore D, Farrell B, Schimmel LD, Altman RJ, et al. (2006) Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194: 1644-51.
5. Aron DC, Harper DL, Shepardson LB, Rosenthal GE, (1998) Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance. JAMA 279: 1968-72.
6. Fantini MP, Stivanello E, Frammartino B, Barone AP, Fusco D, et al. (2006) Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony. BMC Health Serv Res 15: 100.
7. Korst LM, Gornbein JA, Gregory KD, (2005) Rethinking the cesarean rate: how pregnancy complications may affect inter-hospital comparisons. Med Care 43: 237-45.
8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2000) Evaluation of cesarean delivery. Washington, DC ACOG.
9. Fischer A, LaCoursiere DY, Barnard P, Bloebaum L, Varner M, (2005) Differences between hospitals in cesarean rates for term primigravidas with cephalic presentation. Obstet Gynecol 105: 816-21.
10. Meikle SF, Steiner CA, Zhang J, Lawrence WL, (2005) A national estimate of the elective primary caesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 105: 751-756.
11. Main EK, Bloomfield L, Hunt G, Sutter Health, First Pregnancy and Delivery Clinical Initiative Committee (2004) Development of a large-scale obstetric quality-improvement program that focused on the nulliparous patient at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190: 1747-56.
12. Su M, Hannah WJ, Willan A, Ross S, Hannah ME, et al. (2004) Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labour and delivery complications in the Term Breech Trial. BJOG 111: 1065-74.
13. Kontopoulos EV, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM, (2004) The impact of route of delivery and presentation on twin neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study in the USA, 1995-97. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 15: 219-24.
14. Coonrod DV, Drachman D, Hobson P, Manriquez M, (2008) Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 694.e1-694.e11.
15. Bailit JL, Dooley SL, Peaceman AN, (1999) Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates. Obstet Gynecol 93: 1025-30.
16. Lieberman E, Lang JM, Heffner LJ, Cohen A, (1998) Assessing the role of case mix in cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 92: 1-7.
17. Capon A, Di Lallo D, Perucci CA, Panepuccia L, (2005) Case-mix adjusted odds ratios as an alternative way to compare hospital performances. Eur J Epidemiol 20: 497-500.
18. Teperi J, Keskimaki I, Hemminki E, Erkkola R, Merilaenen J, (1995) A population-based analysis of variation in Caesarean birth rates Eur J Public Health 5: 116-122.
19. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP, (2003) Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 157: 940-3.
20. Regione Lazio, (2008) Regional Outcome Research Program 2006-2008. Available:http://151.1.149.72/vislazio_en/metodi_statistici.php.
21. Rothman K, (2002) Epidemiology: An Introduction. Oxford Oxford University Press.
22. Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C, (2009) Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201: 308.e1-8.
23. Brennan DJ, Murphy M, Robson MS, O'Herlihy C, (2011) The singleton, cephalic, nulliparous woman after 36 weeks of gestation: contribution to overall cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 117 (2 Pt 1): 273-9.
24. Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, et al. (2006) Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries. BJOG 113 (6): 647-56.
25. Mossialos E, Allin S, Karras K, Davaki K, (2005) An investigation of Caesarean sections in three Greek hospitals: the impact of financial incentives and convenience. Eur J Public Health 15: 288-95.
26. Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Mahamood TA, et al. (2010) Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ 341: c5065.
27. Powell AE, Davies HT, Thomson RG, (2003) Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 122-8.
28. Stivanello E, Knight M, Dallolio L, Frammartino B, Rizzo N, et al. (2010) Peripartum hysterectomy and cesarean delivery: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 89 (3): 321-7.
29. Nohr EA, Vaeth M, Baker JL, Sørensen TI, Olsen J, et al. (2008) Combined associations of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 87: 1750-9.
30. Chaillet N, Dumont A, (2007) Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth 34: 53-64.
31. Bingham D, Main EK, (2010) Effective implementation strategies and tactics for leading change on maternity units. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 24: 32-42.