Quality improvement in maternity care: Promising approaches from the medical and public health perspectives

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 574-580

  Main, Elliott K ^a,b   Bingham, Debra ^a,c  

^a California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Quality collaborative; Quality improvement; Quality measurement

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HOSPITAL PLANNING; INSTITUTIONAL CARE; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MULTIHOSPITAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SIMULATION; STAFF TRAINING; TEAMWORK; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

BENCHMARKING; CALIFORNIA; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 56849098907     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283184040     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21 st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
2. Sakala C, Corey M. Evidence-based maternity care. Milbank Report (in press). Good comprehensive review of which of our current obstetric practices are truly evidence based and where there are improvement opportunities. Also, this review is a good source of economic information that is otherwise hard to track down.
3. Lu MC, Fridman M, Korst LM, et al. Variations in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage across hospitals in California. Matern Child Health J 2005; 9:297-306.
4. Sakala C. Letter from North America: understanding and minimizing nocebo effects in childbearing women. Birth 2007; 34:348-350. A short essay that directly addresses the principle of 'first do no harm' in the context of maternity care.
5. Lichtmacher A. Quality assessment tools: ACOG Voluntary Review of Quality of Care Program, Peer Review Reporting System. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008; 35:147-162. A nice review of where the peer-review process was and the new ACOG-sponsored approach, especially relevant for smaller hospitals or hospitals with intractable issues.
6. Leape LL, Berwick DM. Five years after to err is human: what have we learned? JAMA 2005; 293:2384-2390.
7. Hales BM, Pronovost PJ. The checklist: a tool for error management and performance improvement. J Crit Care 2008; 21:231-235. After reviewing the advances made in other high-risk areas using checklists, this review is a guide to the evolution of medical and critical care checklists, and a discussion of the barriers and risks to their implementation.
8. Gawande A. Annals of medicine: the checklist. The New Yorker, 10 December 2007. Available http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/12/10/ 071210fa_fact_gawande. Accessed 19 July 2008. This wonderfully written essay is useful to give to department members when introducing the concept of checklists.
9. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2725-2732.
10. Cherouny PH, Federico FA, Haraden C, et al. Idealized design of perinatal care. IHI innovation series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2005. Available at www.IHI.org.
11. Clark S, Belfort M, Saade G, et al. Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:480e1-480e5. A landmark quality-improvement project that is being emulated around the country. This will serve as the paradigm for safe use of oxytocin going forward.
12. Factor SH, Whitney CG, Zywicki S, Schuchat A, ABC Surveillance Team. Effects of hospital policies based on 1996 group B streptococcal disease consensus guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:377-382.
13. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Byrum SL, et al. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:105e1-105e7. A thought-provoking opinion essay on establishing a quality program that improves outcomes and reduces litigation claims using protocols, practice guidelines, and teamwork rules.
14. Gardner R, Raemer DB. Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008; 35:97-127. An excellent review of all kinds of simulation and simulators used for obstetrics and gynecology training.
15. Maelovitz S, Barkai G, Leasing JB, et al. Recurrent obstetric management mistakes identified by simulation. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:1295-1300. This study used simulation to identify common errors in key obstetric emergency situations that can then be taught proactively.
16. Crofts JF, Bartlett C, Ellis D, et al. Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:1477-1485.
17. Draycott TJ, Crofts JF, Ash JP, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:14-20. A well done study that can demonstrate the beneficial effects of simulator training on actual patient outcomes. One of the very few studies that has been able to do so.
18. Crofts JF, Ellis D, Draycott TJ, et al. Change in knowledge of midwives and obstetricians following obstetric emergency training: a randomized controlled trial of local hospital, simulation centre and teamwork training. BJOG 2007; 114:1534-1541. An important article that found that specific training showed benefit, but it mattered not whether it was done at the local hospital versus a simulation center nor whether team training was added.
19. Ellis D, Crofts JF, Hunt LP, et al. Hospital, simulation center, and teamwork training for eclampsia management: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:723-731. Another well done study that found the same results as the trial reported above, though this trial added observations on the actual performance afterwards.
20. Nielsen P, Mann S. Team function in obstetrics to reduce errors and improve outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008; 35:81-95. An excellent recent review of the principles behind teamwork training and 'crew resource management'.
21. Nielsen PE, Goldman MB, Mann S, et al. Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:48-55. This impressive multicentered RCT by the original authors of team training did not find any clinical outcome improvements. This should give pause to expensive team training programs but should not obscure the value of many of the principles of teamwork.
22. Joint Commission. Behaviors that undermine a culture of safety. Sentinel Event Alert 40, 9 July 2008. Available at http://www.jointcommission.org/ SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_40.htm. Provider behavior can have significant deleterious consequences for safety and quality. This recent sentinel event alert describes the behaviors and potential actions that leaders and administrators should take. This should be an area of zero tolerance.
23. Winters BD, Pham JC, Hunt EA, et al. Rapid response systems: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:1238-1243. A good review of the literature that identifies the weaknesses in the evidence base that exists today. Essentially, the support is less than desired but there is considerable heterogeneity in the studies, making it difficult to be definitive.
24. Catanzarite V, Almryde K, Bombard A. Grand Rounds: Ob Team Stat: Developing a better L&D rapid response team. Contemporary OB/GYN; 2007. pp. 1-7. A nice description of the process of improving response times to emergencies on labor and delivery. Describes well how the barriers were overcome.
25. Davis D, Thomson O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, et al. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or healthcare outcomes? JAMA 1999; 282:867-874.
26. Gambone J, Reiter RC. Elements of a successful quality improvement and patient safety program in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008; 35:129-145.
27. Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M, et al. Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:1234-1245.
28. Main EK, Bloomfield L, Hunt G, Sutter Health, First Pregnancy and Delivery Clinical Initiative Committee. Development of a large-scale obstetric quality-improvement program that focused on the nulliparous patient at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1747-1766.
29. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2.
30. Althabe F, Buekens P, Bergel E, et al. A behavioral intervention to improve obstetrical care. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:1929-1940. This is one of the best done studies looking at introduction of new guidelines into obstetric practice. Unfortunately, they used the 'kitchen sink' approach (multiple different techniques at the same time) so that we do not know if lesser interventions might also work.
31. Bingham D. Every change needs a champion. J Perinat Educ 2007; 16:8-10. Makes the important point that the publication of evidence-based care practices alone does not change clinical practice.
32. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York, New York: Free Press; 2003.
33. Leape LL, Rogers G, Hanna D, et al. Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives. Qual Saf Healthcare 2006; 15:289-295.
34. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). The Breakthrough Series: IHI's collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. Boston, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003.
35. Korst LM, Gregory KD, Lu MC, et al. A framework for the development of maternal quality of care indicators. Matern Child Health 2005; 9:317-341.
36. Main EK, Moore D, Farrell B, et al. Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:1644-1651.
37. Mann S, Pratt S, Gluck P, et al. Assessing quality obstetrical care: development of standardized measures. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006; 32:497-505.
38. Bailit JL. Measuring the quality of inpatient obstetrical care. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007; 62:207-213. A balanced review of current measures used for inpatient quality measures.
39. Auerbach AD, Landefeld S, Shojania KG. The tension between needing to improve care and knowing how to do it. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:608-613. This is an important note of caution as we move rapidly into large-scale quality-improvement projects. It does not advocate slowing down but rather approaching quality improvement as a scientific endeavor.