Resource mobilization in entrepreneurial firms

Journal of Business Venturing

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 19-30

  Villanueva, Jaume ^a   Van de Ven, Andrew H ^b   Sapienza, Harry J ^b  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Interorganizational relations; New ventures; Power; Resource dependence; Resource mobilization; Social embeddedness

Indexed keywords

EID: 81555220106     PISSN: 08839026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bosse D.A., Phillips R.A., Harrison J.S. Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 2009, 30(4):447-456.
2. Casciaro T., Piskorski J. Power imbalance, mutual dependence and constraint absorption: a closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 2005, 50:167-199.
3. Eikenberry A.M., Kluver J.D. The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk?. Public Administration Review 2004, 64(2):132-140.
4. Eisenhardt K.M., Schoonhoven C.B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 1996, 7:136-151.
5. Emerson R.M. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review 1962, 27:31-41.
6. Fischer E., Reuber R. Contextual antecedents and consequences of relationships between young firms and distinct types of dominant exchange partners. Journal of Business Venturing 2004, 19:681-706.
7. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration 1984, Polity Press, Cambridge.
8. Gouldner A. Reciprocity and autonomy in functional theory. Symposium on Sociological Theory 1959, 241-270. Harper & Row, New York. L. Gross (Ed.).
9. Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 1985, 91:481-510.
10. Gulati R., Sytch M. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 2007, 52:32-69.
11. Homans G. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms 1961, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.
12. Katila R., Rosenberger J.D., Eisenhardt K.M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 2008, 53(2):295-332.
13. Knoke D. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective 1990, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
14. Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 1992, 37:76-104.
15. Lawler E.J., Yoon J. Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review 1993, 58:465-481.
16. Martens M.L., Jennings J.E., Jennings P.D. Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 50(5):1107-1132.
17. Nelson T. The persistence of founder influence: management, ownership and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24:707-724.
18. Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R. The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective 1978, Harper and Row, London.
19. Piskorski M.J., Casciaro T. When more power makes actors worse off: turning a profit in the American economy. Social Forces 2006, 85(2):1011.
20. Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. M.S. Poole, A.H. Van de Ven (Eds.).
21. Provan K.G. Recognizing, measuring, and interpreting the potential/enacted power distinction in organizational research. Academy of Management Review 1980, 5:549-559.
22. Ring P.S., Van de Ven A.H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 1994, 19(1):90-118.
23. Roth P.L. Missing data: a conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology 1994, 47:537-560.
24. Santos F.M., Eisenhardt K.M. Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal 2009, 52(4):643-671.
25. Van de Ven A.H. The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 1993, 8(3):211-230.
26. Van de Ven A.H., Walker G. The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly 1984, 29:598-621.
27. Van de Ven A.H., Hudson R., Schroeder D.M. Designing new business startups: entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. Journal of Management 1984, 10(1):87-107.
28. Van de Ven A.H., Sapienza H.J., Villanueva J. Entrepreneurial pursuit of self and collective interests. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2007, 1:353-370.
29. Yli-Renko H., Sapienza H.J., Hay M. The role of contractual governance flexibility in realizing the outcomes of key customer relationships. Journal of Business Venturing 2001, 16:529-555.