Marrying contradictions: Healthcare professionals perceptions of empowerment in the care of people with Type 2 Diabetes

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Newton, Paul ^a   Sasha, Scambler ^b   Koula, Asimakopoulou ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Empowerment; Healthcare professionals; Type 2 Diabetes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMPOWERMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL SERVICE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PERCEPTION; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE;

EID: 81555214462     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Knight K.M., Dornan T., Bundy C. The diabetes educator: trying hard, but must concentrate more on behaviour. Diabet Med 2005, 23:485-501.
2. Funnell M.M., Anderson R.M. Empowerment and self-management of diabetes. Clin Diab 2004, 22:123-197.
3. Anderson R.M., Funnell M.M. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Educ Couns 2005, 57:153-157.
4. Funnell M.M., Anderson R.M., Arnold M.S., Barr P.A., Donnelly M., Johnson P.D., et al. Empowerment: an idea whose time has come in diabetes education. Diabetes Educ 1991, 17:37-41.
5. Cattaneo L.B., Chapman A.R. The process of empowerment; a model for use in research and practice. Am Psychol 2010, 65:646-659.
6. Luftey K On practices of 'good doctoring': reconsidering the relationship between provider roles and patient adherence. Social Health Ill 2005, 27:421-447.
7. Jones I.R., Berney L., Kelly M., Doyal L., Griffiths C., Feder G., et al. Is patient involvement possible when decisions involve scarce resources? A qualitative study of decision-making in primary care. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59:93-102.
8. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social scientists 2006, Sage, London. J. Ritchie, J. Lewis (Eds.).
9. Newton P., Asimakopoulou K.G. A response to Professor Anderson's commentary on Empowerment article by Asimakopoulou K. Eur Diab Nurs 2008, 5:36.
10. Crouch M., McKenzie H. Social realities of loss and suffering following mastectomy. Health 2000, 4:196.
11. Crouch M., McKenzie H. The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Soc Sci Info 2006, 45:483.
12. Kai-Cheong Chan N., Gillick A.C. Fatness as a disability: questions of personal and group identity. Disabil Soc 2009, 24:231-243.
13. Bourke S., Burgman I. Coping with bullying in Australian schools: how children with disabilities experience support from friends, parents and teachers. Disabil Soc 2010, 25:359-371.
14. Piper S. Patient empowerment: emancipatory or technological practice?. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 79:173-177.
15. Holmstrom I., Roing M. The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 79:167-172.
16. Asimakopoulou K., Scambler S., Gilbert D. Patient empowerment in diabetes: time for returning back to basics?. Treatment Strategies 2010, 1:193-196.
17. Willig C. Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method 2001, OU Press, Bukingham.
18. Malterud Power inequalities in health care - empowerment revisited. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 79:139-140.