Equivalence relationship between the general combined-oriented CCR model and the weighted minimax MOLP formulation

Journal of King Saud University - Science

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 47-54

  Ebrahimnejad, A ^a   Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F ^b  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Combined oriented CCR model; Data envelopment analysis; Minimax method; Multiple objective linear programming

Indexed keywords

EID: 81555207169     PISSN: 10183647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2010.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Athanassopoulis A. Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel systems. Management Science 1998, 39:1261-1264.
2. Belton V. An integrating data envelopment analysis with multiple criteria decision analysis. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications in Business, Industry and Commerce 1992, 71-79. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein, S. Zionts (Eds.).
3. Belton V., Vickers S.P. Demystifying DEAA visual interactive approach based on multiple criteria analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society 1993, 44:883-896.
4. Chambers R.G., Chung Y., Fare R. Profit, directional distance functions, and nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 1998, 98:351-364.
5. Charnes A., Cooper W. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banking. Journal of Econometrics 1990, 46:73-79.
6. Charnes A., Cooper W., Lewin A., Seiford L. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory Methodology and Applications 1994, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
7. Charnes A., Cooper W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
8. Dyson R., Thanassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society 1988, 39:563-576.
9. Emrouznejad A., Latef Anouze A., Thanassoulis E. A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 200:279-304.
10. Emrouznejad A., Amin G.R., Thanassoulis E., Latef Anouze A. On the boundedness of the SORM DEA models with negative data. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 206:265-268.
11. Golany B. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1988, 39:725-734.
12. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Jahanshaloo G.R., Ebrahimnejad A., Soltanifar M., Manosourzadeh S.M. Target setting in the general combined-oriented CCR model using an interactive MOLP method. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2010, 234:1-9.
13. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Jahanshaloo G.R., Soltanifar M., Ebrahimnejad A., Manosourzadeh S.M. Relationship between MOLP and DEA based on output orientated CCR dual model. Expert Systems with Applications 2010, 37:4331-4336.
14. Halme M., Joro T., Korhonen P., Salo S., Wallenius J. A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1999, 45:10-15.
15. Joro R., Korhonen P., Wallenius J. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Management Science 1998, 44:962-970.
16. Joro R., Korhonen P., Zionts S. An interactive approach to improve estimates of value efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operations Research 2003, 149:688-699.
17. Korhonen P., Somismaa M., Siljamaki A. On the use of value efficiency analysis and some further developments. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2002, 17:49-65.
18. Shin W., Ravindran A. Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey I - Continuous case. Computers and Operations Research 1991, 18:97-114.
19. Stewart T.J. Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society 1996, 44:654-665.
20. Thanassoulis E., Allen R. Simulating weights restrictions in data envelopment analysis by means of unobserved DMUs. Management Science 1998, 44:586-594.
21. Thompson R., Langemeier L., Lee C., Thrall R. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics 1990, 46:93-108.
22. Wierzbicki A. The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. Multiple Objective Decision Making, Theory and Application 1980, Springer-Verlag, New York. G. Fandel, T. Gal (Eds.).
23. Wong H., Beasley J. Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society 1990, 41:829-835.
24. Wong B.Y.H., Luque M., Yang J.B. Using interactive multiobjective methods to solve DEA problems with value judgements. Computers and Operations Research 2009, 36:623-636.
25. Yang J.B., Wong B.Y.H., Xu D.L., Stewart T.J. Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP methods. European Journal of Operations Researches 2009, 195:205-222.
26. Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis with preference structure. Journal of Operational Research Society 1996, 47:136-150.
27. Zionts S., Wallenius J. An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Science 1976, 22(6):652-663.