Relationship between MOLP and DEA based on output-orientated CCR dual model

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 4331-4336

  Lotfi, F Hosseinzadeh ^a   Jahanshahloo, G R ^a   Soltanifar, M ^a   Ebrahimnejad, A ^a   Mansourzadeh, S M ^b  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Interactive multiobjective programming; Min ordering method; Multiple objective linear programming (MOLP)

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKERS; DUAL MODEL; EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS; EQUIVALENCE MODELS; FUTURE PERFORMANCE; INTERACTIVE MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; MANAGEMENT CONTROL; MIN-ORDERING METHOD; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS;

DATA HANDLING; DECISION THEORY; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; LINEARIZATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 77249145818     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.066     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen R., Athanassopoulous A., Dyson R., and Thanassoulis E. Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution development and future directions. Annals of Operations Research 73 (1997) 13-34
2. Athanassopoulis A. Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel systems. Management Science 39 10 (1998) 1261-1264
3. Banker R., Charnes A., and Cooper W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 9 (1984) 1078-1092
4. Charnes A., and Cooper W. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banking. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1990) 73-79
5. Charnes A., Cooper W., Lewin A., and Seiford L. Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications (1994), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
6. Charnes A., Cooper W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
7. Dyson R., and Thanassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society 39 6 (1988) 563-576
8. Ehrgott M. Multicriteria optimization. 2nd ed. (2005), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
9. In: Gal T., Hanne T., and Stewart T. (Eds). Advances in multiple criteria decision making (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers
10. Golany B. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 39 8 (1988) 725-734
11. Golany B., and Roll Y. Measuring efficiency of power plants in Israel by data envelopment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 41 3 (1994) 291-301
12. Halme M., Joro T., Korhonen P., Salo S., and Wallenius J. A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 45 1 (1999) 103-115
13. Joro R., Korhonen P., and Wallenius J. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Management Science 44 7 (1998) 962-970
14. Joro R., Korhonen P., and Zionts S. An interactive approach to improve estimates of value efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operations Research 149 (2003) 688-699
15. Koopmans T.C. Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Analysis of Production and Allocation (1951), John Wiley, Inc. pp. 33-97
16. Korhonen P., Somismaa M., and Siljamaki A. On the use of value efficiency analysis and some further developments. Journal of Productivity Analysis 17 (2002) 49-65
17. Masud Abu Syed Md., and Hwang C.-L. Multiple objective decision making methods and applications (1978), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
18. Post T., and Spronk J. Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 115 (1999) 472-487
19. Sawaragi Y., Nakayama H., and Tanino T. Theory of multiobjective optimization (1985), Academic Press Inc.
20. Steuer R.E. Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation, and application (1986), Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL
21. Thanassoulis E., and Allen R. Simulating weights restrictions in data envelopment analysis by means of unobserved DMUs. Management Science 44 4 (1998) 586-594
22. Thompson R., Langemeier L., Lee C., and Thrall R. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1990) 93-108
23. In: Wierzbicki A.P., Makowski M., and Wessels J. (Eds). Modelbased decision support methodology with environmental applications (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers
24. Wong H., and Beasley J. Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society 41 9 (1990) 829-835
25. Wong B.Y.H., Luque M., and Yang J.B. Using interactive multiobjective methods to solve DEA problems with value judgements. Computers and Operations Research (2009) 623-636
26. Yang J.B., Wong B.Y.H., Xu D.L., and Stewart T.J. Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP methods. European Journal of Operations Research 195 (2009) 205-222
27. Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis with preference structure. Journal of Operational Research Society 47 1 (1996) 136-150
28. Zionts S., and Wallenius J. An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Science 22 6 (1976) 652-663