Are there interactional reasons why doctors may find it hard to tell patients that their physical symptoms may have emotional causes? A conversation analytic study in neurology outpatients

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Monzoni, Chiara M ^a   Duncan, Roderick ^b   Grünewald, Richard ^a   Reuber, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conversation Analysis; Doctor patient communication; Functional symptoms; Medically unexplained symptoms; Psychogenic non epileptic seizures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AWARENESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SYMPTOM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICATION; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGY; OUTPATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC DISORDERS; SEIZURES; SOMATOFORM DISORDERS; TAPE RECORDING; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 81555197165     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.014     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Peveler R., Kilkenny L., Kinmonth A.L. Medically unexplained physical symptoms in primary care; a comparison of self-report screening questionnaires and clinical opinion. J Psychosom Res 1997, 42:245-252.
2. Weijden T., van der Velsen M., van Dinant G.J., Hasselt C.M., van Grol R. Unexplained complaints in general practice: prevalence, patients' expectations, and professionals' test-ordering behaviour. Med Decis Making 2003, 23:226-231.
3. Stone J., Carson A., Duncan R., Roberts R., Warlow C., Hibberd C., et al. Who is referred to neurology clinics?-the diagnoses made in 3781 new patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010, 112:747-751.
4. Barsky A.J., Orav E.J., Bates D.W. Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005, 62:903-910.
5. Barsky A.J., Borus J.F. Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med 1999, 130:910-921.
6. Fink P. Surgery and medical treatment in persistent somatising patients. J Psychosom Res 1992, 36:439-447.
7. Carson A.J., Ringbauer B., Stone J., McKenzie L., Warlow C., Sharpe M. Do medically unexplained symptoms matter? A prospective cohort study of 300 new referrals to neurology outpatients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000, 68:207-210.
8. Angus-Leppan H. Diagnosing epilepsy in neurology clinics: a prospective study. Seizure 2008, 17:431-436.
9. Kotsopoulos I.A., de Krom M.C., Kessels F.G., Lodder J., Troost J., Twellaar M., et al. The diagnosis of epileptic and non-epileptic seizures. Epilepsy Res 2003, 57:59-67.
10. Salmon P. Conflict, collusion or collaboration in consultations about medically unexplained symptoms: the need for a curriculum of medical explanation. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 67:246-254.
11. Coia P., Morley S. Medical reassurance and patients' responses. J Psychosom Res 1998, 45:377-386.
12. Fitzpatrick R. Telling patients there is nothing wrong. Brit Med J 1996, 313:311-312.
13. Marchant-Haycox S., Salmon P. Patients' and doctors strategies in consultations with unexplained symptoms. Interactions of gynaecologists with women presenting menstrual problems. Psychosomatics 1997, 38:440-450.
14. Werner A., Malterud K. It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57:1409-1419.
15. Ring A., Dowrick C.F., Humphris G.M., Davies J., Salmon P. The somatising effect of clinical consultations: what patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms. Soc Sci Med 2005, 61:1505-1515.
16. Kanaan R., Armstrong D., Wessely S. Limits to truth-telling: neurologists' communication in conversion disorder. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 77:296-301.
17. Thompson R. What is it like to receive a diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures. Unpublished D.Phil dissertation. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; 2007.
18. Joosten A., Mazeland H., Meyboom-de Jong B. Psychosocial explanations of complaints in Dutch general practice. Fam Pract 1999, 16:245-249.
19. Burbaum C., Stresing A.M., Fritzsche K., Auer O., Wirsching M., Lucius-Hoene G. Medically unexplained symptoms as a threat to patients' identity? A conversation analysis of patients' reactions to psychosomatic attributions. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 79:207-217.
20. Hall-Patch L., Brown R., House A., Howlett S., Kemp S., Lawton G., et al. Acceptability and effectiveness of a strategy for the communication of the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsia 2010, 51:70-78.
21. Howlett S., Grünewald R.A., Khan A., Reuber M. Engagement in psychological treatment for functional neurological symptoms-barriers and solutions. Psychother: Theor Res Pract Train 2007, 44:354-360.
22. Reuber M., Mitchell A.J., Howlett S.J., Crimlisk H.L., Grünewald R.A. Functional symptoms in neurology: questions and answers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005, 76:307-314.
23. Salmon P., Dowrick C.F., Ring A., Humphris G.M. Voiced but unheard agendas: qualitative analysis of the psychosocial cues that patients with unexplained symptoms present to general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 2004, 54:171-176.
24. Salmon P., Humphris G.M., Ring A., Davies J.C., Dowrick C.F. Why do primary care physicians propose medical care to patients with medically unexplained symptoms? A new method of sequence analysis to test theories of patient pressure. Psychosom Med 2006, 68:570-577.
25. Ring A., Dowrick C.F., Humphris G.M., Salmon P. Do patients with unexplained physical symptoms pressurize general practitioners for somatic treatment? A qualitative study. Brit Med J 2004, 328:1057-1060.
26. Peters S., Stanley I., Rose M., Salmon P. Patients with medically unexplained symptoms: sources of patients' authority and implications for demands on medical care. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46:559-565.
27. Roter D.L. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr 1977, 5:281-315.
28. Salmon P., May C. Patients' influence on doctors' behaviour: a case study of patient strategies in somatisation. Int J Psychiatric Med 1995, 25:319-329.
29. Salmon P., Ring A., Dowrick C., Humphris G. What do general practice patients want when they present medically unexplained symptoms, and why do their doctors feel pressurized?. J Psychosom Res 2005, 59:255-260.
30. Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients 2006, CUP, Cambridge. J. Heritage, D.W. Maynard (Eds.).
31. Heritage J., Maynard D.W. Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interaction: 30 years of research. Annu Rev Sociol 2006, 32:351-374.
32. Charon R., Greene M.J., Adelamn R.D. Multi-dimensional interaction analysis: a collaborative approach to the study of medical discourse. Soc Sci Med 1994, 39:955-965.
33. Stiles W.B. Evaluating medical interview process components: null correlations with outcomes may be misleading. Med Care 1989, 27:212-220.
34. Sacks H. Notes on methodology. Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis 1984, 21-27. CUP, Cambridge. J.M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (Eds.).
35. Sacks H. Lectures on Conversation 1992, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. G. Jefferson (Ed.).
36. Plug L., Sharrack B., Reuber M., Seizure Seizure, fit or attack? The use of diagnostic labels by patients with epileptic or non-epileptic seizures. Appl Linguist 2010, 31:94-114.
37. Reuber M., Monzoni C., Sharrack B., Plug L. Using interactional and linguistic analysis to distinguish between epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a prospective blinded multirater study. Epilepsy Behav 2009, 16:139-144.
38. Heath C. The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general-practice consultation. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings 1992, 235-267. CUP, Cambridge. P. Drew, J. Heritage (Eds.).
39. Peräkylä A. Communicating and responding to diagnosis. Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients 2006, 214-247. CUP, Cambridge. J. Heritage, D.W. Maynard (Eds.).
40. Heritage J., Sefi S. Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings 1992, 359-419. CUP, Cambridge. P. Drew, J. Heritage (Eds.).
41. Collins S., Drew P., Watt I., Entwistle V. 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' approaches in decision-making about treatment. Soc Sci Med 2005, 61:2611-2627.
42. Maynard D.W. On clinicians co-implicating recipients' perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings 1992, 331-358. CUP, Cambridge. P. Drew, J. Heritage (Eds.).
43. Teas-Gill V., Maynard D.W. On 'labelling' in actual interaction: delivering and receiving diagnoses of developmental disabilities. Soc Probl 1995, 42:11-37.
44. Mangione-Smith R., Stivers T., Elliott M., McDonald L., Heritage J. Online commentary on physical exam findings: a communication tool for avoiding inappropriate antibiotic prescribing?. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56:313-320.
45. Stivers T. Participating in decisions about treatment: overt parent pressure for antibiotic medication in pediatric encounters. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54:1111-1130.
46. Stivers T. 'Symptoms only' and 'candidate diagnoses': presenting the problem in pediatric encounters. Health Commun 2002, 18:41-74.
47. Stivers T. Non-antibiotic treatment recommendations: delivery formats and implications for parent resistance. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60:949-964.
48. Stivers T. Treatment decisions: negotiations between doctors and patients in acute care encounters. Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients 2006, 279-312. CUP, Cambridge. J. Heritage, D.W. Maynard (Eds.).
49. Heritage J., Robinson J., Elliott M., Beckett M., Wilkes M. Reducing patients' unmet concerns in primary care: the difference one word can make. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22:1429-1433.
50. Jefferson G. Notes on a possible metric which provides for a "standard maximum silence" of one second in conversation. Conversation 1989, 166-196. Multilingual Matters, Clevendon. D. Roger, P. Bull (Eds.).
51. Raymond G. Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. Am Sociol Rev 2003, 68:939-967.
52. Pomerantz A. Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimizing claims. Hum Stud 1986, 9:219-229.
53. Schegloff E.A. Overlapping talk and the organisation for turn-taking in conversation. Lang Soc 2000, 29:1-63.
54. Monzoni CM, Duncan R, Grünewald R, Reuber M. How do neurologists talk about medically unexplained symptoms: a conversation analytic study. J Psychosom Res; forthcoming.
55. Houtkoop H., Mullen P. Talking delicacy: speaking about sexuality during gynaecological consultations. Sociol Health Illn 1993, 15:295-314.
56. Silverman D., Peräkylä A. AIDS counselling: the interactional organisation of talk about 'delicate' issues. Sociol Health Illn 1990, 3:293-318.
57. Silverman D. Describing sexual activities in HIV counselling: the cooperative management of delicacy. Text 1994, 14:427-453.
58. Monzoni CM, Reuber M. Linguistic and interactional restrictions in an outpatient clinic: the challenge of delivering the diagnosis and explaining the aetiology of functional neurological problems. In: Chevalier F, Moore J, editors. Constraints and interactional restrictions in institutional talk: studies in conversation analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamin; forthcoming.
59. Bergmann J.R. Veiled morality: notes on discretion in psychiatry. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings 1992, 137-162. CUP, Cambridge. P. Drew, J. Heritage (Eds.).