Evaluating the efficacy of a local tree protection policy using LiDAR remote sensing data

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 19-25

  Sung, Chan Yong ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Local environmental policy; Object based image segmentation; Tree removal permit; Urban forest management; Urban remote sensing

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ANTENNAS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HOUSING; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING;

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; OBJECT BASED; TREE REMOVAL PERMIT; URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT; URBAN REMOTE SENSING;

FORESTRY;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; FORESTRY POLICY; LIDAR; REGULATORY APPROACH; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN FORESTRY; URBAN PLANNING;

AIR CRAFT; DATA PROCESSING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; LAND USE; PHOTOGRAPHY; RADAR; REMOTE SENSING;

LAKEWAY; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 81455158743     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Akbari H., Kurn D.M., Bretz S.E., Hanford J.W. Peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings 1997, 25:139-148.
2. Angold P.G., Sadler J.P., Hill M.O., Pullin A., Rushton S., Austin K., Small E., Wood B., Wadsworth R. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Science of The Total Environment 2006, 360:196-204.
3. Benz U.C., Hofmann P., Willhauck G., Lingenfelder I., Heynen M. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2004, 58:239-258.
4. Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2010, 65:2-16.
5. Booth D.B., Hartley D., Jackson R. Forest cover, impervious-surface area, and the mitigation of stormwater impacts. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2002, 38:835-845.
6. Canty A., Ripley B. R package 'boot' (Version 1.2-41) [computer software] 2009, Available from:. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/boot/boot.pdf.
7. Carleer A.P., Debeir O., Wolff E. Assessment of very high spatial resolution satellite image segmentation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2005, 71:1285-1294.
8. Churkina G., Brown D.G., Keoleian G. Carbon stored in human settlements: The conterminous United States. Global Change Biology 2010, 16:135-143.
9. City of Lakeway City of Lakeway Ordinances 2011, Available from:, (retrieved 13.07.11). http://www.cityoflakeway.com/index.aspx?nid=108.
10. Conway T.M., Urbani L. Variations in municipal urban forestry policies, a case study of Toronto, Canada. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2007, 6:181-192.
11. Cooper J.C. Legislation to protect and replace trees on private land: Ordinances in Westchester County, New York. Journal of Arboriculture 1996, 22:270-278.
12. Coughlin R.E., Mendes D.C., Strong A.L. Local programs in the United States for preventing the destruction of trees on private land. Landscape and Urban Planning 1988, 15:165-171.
13. Efron B. An Introduction to the Bootstrap 1993, Chapman & Hall, New York.
14. Environmental Software Developers BerkeleyImageSeg (Version 1.0rc8) [computer software] 2010, (Berkeley, CA).
15. Escobedo F., Varela S., Zhao M., Wagner J.E., Zipperer W. Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities. Environmental Science & Policy 2010, 13:362-372.
16. Goodwin N.R., Coops N.C., Tooke T.R., Christen A., Voogt J.A. Characterizing urban surface cover and structure with airborne lidar technology. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 2009, 35:297-309.
17. Grove J.M., Troy A.R., O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., Burch W.R., Cadenasso M.L., Pickett S.T.A. Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems 2006, 9:578-597.
18. Heynen N.C., Lindsey G. Correlates of urban forest canopy cover: Implications for local public works. Public Works Management & Policy 2003, 8:33-47.
19. Hill E., Dorfman J.H., Kramer E. Evaluating the impact of government land use policies on tree canopy coverage. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:407-414.
20. Hodgson M.E., Jensen J.R., Tullis J.A., Riordan K.D., Archer C.M. Synergistic use of Lidar and color aerial photography for mapping urban parcel imperviousness. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2003, 69:973-980.
21. Hope D., Gries C., Zhu W., Fagan W.F., Redman C.L., Grimm N.B., Nelson A.L., Martin C., Kinzig A. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100:8788-8792.
22. ITT VIS ENVI (Version 4.7) [computer software] 2009, (Boulder, CO).
23. Jensen J.R. Introductory digital image processing 2005, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. third ed.
24. Kim J., Ellis C.D. Determining the effects of local development regulations on landscape structure: Comparison of The Woodlands and North Houston, TX. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 92:293-303.
25. Landry S., Pu R. The impact of land development regulation on residential tree cover: An empirical evaluation using high-resolution IKONOS imagery. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 94:94-104.
26. Larsen L., Harlan S.L. Desert dreamscapes: Residential landscape preference and behavior. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 78:85-100.
27. Larson K.L., Casagrande D., Harlan S.L., Yabiku S.T. Residents' yard choices and rationales in a desert city: Social proirities, ecological impacts, and decision tradeoffs. Environmental Management 2009, 44:921-937.
28. Lefsky M.A., Cohen W.B., Parker G.G., Harding D.J. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 2002, 52:19-30.
29. Lim K., Treitz P., Wulder M., St-Onge B., Flood M. LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Progress in Physical Geography 2003, 27:88-106.
30. Luck G.W., Smallbone L.T., O'Brien R. Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: Pattern in space and time. Ecosystems 2009, 12:604-620.
31. Martin C.A., Warren P.S., Kinzig A.P. Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69:355-368.
32. McPherson E.G., Simpson J.R., Xiao Q., Wu C. Million tree Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 99:40-50.
33. Means J.E., Acker S.A., Fitt B.J., Renslow M., Emerson L., Hendrix C.J. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2000, 66:1367-1371.
34. Næsset E. Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data ISPRS. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1997, 52:49-56.
35. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution 2002, 116:381-389.
36. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2006, 4:115-123.
37. Pataki D.E., Alig R.J., Fung A.S., Golubiewski N.E., Kennedy C.A., McPherson E.G., Nowak D.J., Pouyat R.V., Romero Lankao P. Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology 2006, 12:2092-2102.
38. Sander H., Polasky S., Haight R.G. The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota counties, MN, USA. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1646-1656.
39. Schmied A., Pillmann W. Tree protection legislation in European cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2003, 2:115-124.
40. Secord J., Zakhor A. Tree detection in urban regions using aerial lidar and image data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2007, 4:196-200.
41. Simpson J.R., McPherson E.G. Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento. Atmospheric Environment 1998, 32:69-74.
42. Smith M.L., Zhou W., Cadenasso M., Grove M., Band L.E. Evaluation of the national land cover database for hydrologic applications in urban and suburban Baltimore, Maryland. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2010, 46:429-442.
43. Sung C.Y., Li M.-H. The effect of urbanization on stream hydrology in hillslope watersheds in central Texas. Hydrological Processes 2010, 24. 3706-2717.
44. Sung, C. Y., Li, M. H. Considering plant phenology for improving the accuracy of urban impervious surface mapping in subtropical climate regions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, doi:10.1080/01431161.2011.591445, in press.
45. Sung C.Y., Li M.-H., Rogers G.O., Volder A., Wang Z. Investigating alien plant invasion in urban riparian forests in a hot and semi-arid region. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 100:278-286.
46. Taylor J.J., Brown D.G., Larsen L. Preserving natural features: A GIS-based evaluation of a local open-space ordinance. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 82:1-16.
47. Troy A.R., Grove J.M., O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., Pickett S.T.A., Cadenasso M.L. Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environmental Management 2007, 40:394-412.
48. Ulrich R.S. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 1984, 224:420-421.
49. US Census Bureau American FactFinder 2011, Available from:, (retrieved 03.07.11). http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en.
50. US National Climatic Data Center US Climatic Normals 1971-2000 2003, Available from:, (retrieved 10.07.11). http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/climatenormals/clim81/TXnorm.txt.
51. Village of The Hills Rules and regulations 2011, Available from: http://www.thehillspoa.com/thehills/sub_category_list.asp?category=17&title=Rules+and+Regulations (retrieved 18.08.11).
52. Zhou W., Troy A., Grove M. Object-based land cover classification and change analysis in the Baltimore metropolitan area using multitemporal high resolution remote sensing data. Sensors 2008, 8:1613-1636.