A challenging success: a process audit perspective on change

Business Process Management Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 876-897

  Parkes, Alison ^a   Davern, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Business process re engineering; Change management; Process audit; Process enablers; Process management; Workflow

Indexed keywords

EID: 81455147517     PISSN: 14637154     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14637151111182675     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allen, R. (2001), “Workflow: an introduction”, in Fischer, L. (Ed.), WfMC Workflow Handbook 2001, Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point, FL.
2. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1989), “Rethinking the concept of user involvement”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 53-63.
3. Baroudi, J.J., Olson, M.H. and Ives, B. (1986), “An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 232-8.
4. Boland, R.J. and Tenkasi, R.V. (1995), “Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing”, Organization Science, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 350-72.
5. Bryman, A. (2004), Social Research Methods, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Cavana, R.Y., Delahaye, B.L. and Sekaran, U. (2001), Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, Wiley, Brisbane.
7. Hammer, M. (2007), “The process audit”, Harvard Business Review, April, pp. 111-23.
8. Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994), “Explaining the role of user participation in information system use”, Management Science, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 440-65.
9. Joosten, S. (1994), Trigger Modelling for Workflow Analysis, University of Twente, Enschede.
10. Kettinger, W., Teng, J. and Guha, S. (1997), “Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques and tools”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 55-81.
11. Kuechler, W.L., Vaishnavi, V. and Patterson, C. (1998), “‘Soft’ trigger modelling: a technique for incorporating intentionality into workflow specifications”, paper presented at Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Honolulu, HI.
12. Kujala, S. (2003), “User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 22 No. 1, p. 1.
13. Levina, N. (2005), “Collaborating on multi-party information systems development projects: a collective reflection-in-action view”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 109-30.
14. Levina, N. and Vaast, E. (2005), “The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 335-63.
15. McKeen, J.D. and Guimaraes, T. (1997), “Successful strategies for user participation in systems development”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 133-50.
16. Macris, A., Papadimitriou, E. and Vassilacopoulos, G. (2008), “An ontology-based competency model for workflow activity assignment policies”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 72-88.
17. Markus, M.L. (1983), “Power, politics, and MIS implementation”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 430-44.
18. Palmberg, K. (2010), “Experiences of implementing process management: a multiple-case study”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 93-113.
19. Rohloff, M. (2009), “Case study and maturity model for business process management implementation”, in Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J. and Rejjers, H. (Eds), Process Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin.
20. Subramoniam, S., Tounsi, M. and Krishnankutty, K.V. (2009), “The role of BPR in the implementation of ERP systems”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 653-68.
21. van der Aalst, W.M.P. and Lassen, K.B. (2008), “Translating unstructured workflow processes to readable BPEL: theory and implementation”, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 131-59.
22. Yin, R. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.