Influence of SEM vacuum on bone micromechanics using in situ AFM

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 149-155

  Jimenez Palomar, Ines ^a   Shipov, Anna ^b   Shahar, Ron ^b   Barber, Asa H ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

AFM; Bone; FIB; Hydration; Micromechanics

Indexed keywords

AFM; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPES; BONE MATERIALS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FIB; HIGH RESOLUTION; HIGH-VACUUM CONDITIONS; IN-SITU; LENGTH SCALE;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ELASTIC MODULI; ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING; HYDRATION; MECHANICAL TESTING; MICROMECHANICS; RATS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VACUUM;

BONE;

WATER;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; ELASTICITY; FEMUR; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMUR; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 81455131449     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akiva U., Wagner H.D., Weiner S. Modelling the three-dimensional elastic constants of parallel-fibred and lamellar bone. Journal of Materials Science 1998, 33:1497-1509.
2. Barengolts E.I., Curry D.J., Bapna M.S., Kukreja S.C. Effects of endurance exercise on bone mass and mechanical properties in intact and ovariectomized rats. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1993, 8:937-942.
3. Beck K., Brodsky B. Supercoiled protein motifs: the collagen triple-helix and the α-helical coiled coil. Journal of Structural Biology 1998, 122:17-29.
4. Bella J., Brodsky B., Berman H.M. Hydration structure of a collagen peptide. Structure 1995, 3:893-906.
5. Blodgett O.W. Design of Welded Structures 1991, The James F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. 14th ed.
6. Chan Y.L., Ngan A.H.W., King N.M. Use of focused ion beam milling for investigating the mechanical properties of biological tissues: a study of human primary molars. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2009, 2:375-383.
7. Chen P.Y., Stokes A.G., McKittrick J. Comparison of the structure and mechanical properties of bovine femur bone and antler of the North American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis). Acta Biomaterialia 2009, 5:693-706.
8. Currey J.D. The effects of drying and re-wetting on some mechanical properties of cortical bone. Journal of Biomechanics 1988, 21:439-441.
9. Currey J.D. The design of mineralised hard tissues for their mechanical functions. The Journal of Experimental Biology 1999, 202:3285-3294.
10. Currey J.D. What determines the bending strength of compact bone?. The Journal of Experimental Biology 1999, 202:2495-2503.
11. Currey J.D. Bones Structure and Mechanics 2002, Princeton University Press. 2nd ed.
12. Currey J.D., Landete-Castillejos T., Estevez J., Ceacero F., Olguin A., Garcia A., Gallego L. The mechanical properties of red deer antler bone when used in fighting. The Journal of Experimental Biology 2009, 212:3985-3993.
13. Ejersted C., Andreassen T.T., Oxlund H., Jorgensen P.H., Bak B., Haggblad J., Torring O., Nilsson M.H.L. Human parathyroid hormone (1-34) and (1-84) increase the mechanical strength and thickness of cortical bone in rats. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1993, 8:1097-1101.
14. Hang F., Barber A.H. Nano-mechanical properties of individual mineralized collagen fibrils from bone tissue. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2011, 8:500-505.
15. Hang F., Lu D., Bailey R., Jimenez-Palomar I., Stachewicz U., Cortes-Ballesteros B., Davies M., Zech M., Bödefeld C., Barber A.H. In situ tensile testing of nanofibers by combining atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Nanotechnology 2011, 22:365708.
16. Hoffler C.E., Guo X.E., Zysset P.K., Goldstein S.A. An application of nanoindentation technique to measure bone tissue lamellae properties. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2005, 127:1046-1054.
17. Jorgensen P.H., Bak B., Andreassen T.T. Mechanical properties and biochemical composition of rat cortical femur and tibia after long-term treatment with biosynthetic human growth hormone. Bone 1991, 12:353-359.
18. Kasra M., Vanin C.M., MacLusky N.J., Casper R.F., Grynpas M.D. Effects of different estrogen and progestin regimens on the mechanical properties of rat femur. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 1997, 15:118-123.
19. Koester K.J., Ager J.W., Ritchie R.O. The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. Nature Materials 2008, 7:672-677.
20. Krauss S., Fratzl P., Seto J., Currey J.D., Estevez J.A., Funari S.S., Gupta H.S. Inhomogeneous fibril stretching in antler starts after macroscopic yielding: indication for a nanoscale toughening mechanism. Bone 2009, 44:1105-1110.
21. Lewis G., Nyman J.S. The use of nanoindentation for characterizing the properties of mineralized hard tissue: state-of-the art review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 2008, 87B:286-300.
22. Morais J.J.L., deMoura M.F.S.F., Pereira F.A.M., Xavier J., Dourado N., Dias M.I.R., Azevedo J.M.T. The double cantilever beam test applied to mode I fracture characterization of cortical bone tissue. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2010, 3:446-453.
23. Nyman J.S., Roy A., Shen X., Acuna R.L., Tyler J.H., Wang X. The influence of water removal on the strength and toughness of cortical bone. Journal of Biomechanics 2006, 39:931-938.
24. Renugopalakrishnan V., Chandrakason G., Moore S., Hutson T.B., Berney C.V., Bhatnagar R.S. Bound water in collagen. Evidence from Fourier transform infrared and Fourier transform infrared photoacoustic spectroscopic study. Macromolecules 1989, 22:4121-4124.
25. Sedlin E.D., Hirsch C. Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1966, 37:29-48.
26. Tai K., Dao M., Suresh S., Palazoglu A., Ortiz C. Nanoscale heterogeneity promotes energy dissipation in bone. Nature Materials 2007, 6:454-462.
27. Utku F.S., Klein E., Saybasili H., Yucesoy C.A., Weiner S. Probing the role of water in lamellar bone by dehydration in the environmental scanning electron microscope. Journal of Structural Biology 2008, 162:361-367.
28. Wilson E.E., Awonusi A., Morris M.D., Kohn D.H., Tecklenburg M.M.J., Beck L.W. Three structural roles for water in bone observed by solid-state NMR. Biophysical Journal 2006, 90:3722-3731.
29. Wolfram U., Wilke H.J., Zysset P.K. Rehydration of vertebral trabecular bone: influences on its anisotropy, its stiffness and the indentation work with a view to age, gender and vertebral level. Bone 2010, 46:348-354.
30. Yan J., Daga A., Kumar R., Mecholsky J.J. Fracture toughness and work of fracture of hydrated, dehydrated, and ashed bovine bone. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:1929-1936.