Backcasting and forecasting biological invasions of inland lakes

Ecological Applications

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 773-783

  MacIsaac, Hugh J ^a   Borbely, Julianna V M ^a   Muirhead, Jim R ^a   Graniero, Phil A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Bythotrephes; Crustacean, waterflea; GIS; Gravity model; Great Lakes; Long distance dispersal; Nonindigenous species; Spatially explicit; Zooplankton

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FORECASTING METHOD; GIS; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; ZOOPLANKTON;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

BYTHOTREPHES; BYTHOTREPHES LONGIMANUS; CLADOCERA; CRUSTACEA;

EID: 8144223537     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/02-5377     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Blackburn, T. M., and R. P. Duncan. 2001. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414:195-197.
2. Bossenbroek, J. M., J. C. Nekola, and C. E. Kraft. 2001. Prediction of long-distance dispersal using gravity models: zebra mussel invasion of inland lakes. Ecological Applications 11:778-1788.
3. Buchan, L. J., and D. K. Padilla. 1999. Estimating the probability of long-distance overland dispersal of invading aquatic organisms. Ecological Applications 9:254-265.
4. Carlton, J. T. 1996. Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biological Conservation 78:97-106.
5. Cristescu, M., J. Witt, P. D. N. Hebert, H. J. MacIsaac, and I. A. Grigorovich. 2001. An invasion history for Cercopagis pengoi based on mitochondrial gene sequences. Limnology and Oceanography 46:224-229.
6. Dukes, J. S. 2002. Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibility and response to invasion. Ecological Applications 12:602-617.
7. Forsyth, D. M., and R. P. Duncan. 2001. Propagule pressure and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introductions to New Zealand. American Naturalist 157:583-595.
8. Green, A. J., J. Figuerola, and M. I. Sanchez. 2002. Implications of waterbird ecology for the dispersal of aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologia 23:177-189.
9. Grevstad, F. S. 1999. Experimental invasions using biological control introductions: the influence of release size on the chance of population establishment. Biological Invasions 1:313-323.
10. Hanfling, B., G. R. Carvalho, and R. Brandl. 2002. mt-DNA sequences and possible invasion pathways of the Chinese mitten crab. Marine Ecology Progress Series 238:307-310.
11. Havel, J. E., J. B. Shurin, and J. R. Jones. 2002. Estimating dispersal from patterns of spread: spatial and local control of invasion by Daphnia lumholtzi in Missouri lakes. Ecology 83:3306-3318.
12. Hayes, K. R. 2002. Identifying hazards in complex ecological systems. Part 1: fault-tree analysis for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 4:235-249.
13. Haynes, K. E., and A. S. Fotheringham. 1984. Gravity and spatial interaction models. In G. I. Thrall, editor. Volume 2. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, USA.
14. Hebert, P. D. N., and M. Cristescu. 2002. Crustaceans, invasions and genes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:1229-1234.
15. Hengeveld, R. 1989. Dynamics of biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
16. Johnson, L. E., and J. T. Carlton. 1996. Post-establishment spread in large-scale invasions: dispersal mechanisms of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Ecology 77:1686-1690.
17. Johnson, L. E., J. T. Carlton, and A. Ricciardi. 2001. Overland dispersal of aquatic invasive species: a risk assessment of transient recreational boating. Ecological Applications 11:1789-1799.
18. Johnson, L. E., and D. K. Padilla. 1996. Geographic spread of exotic species: ecological lessons and opportunities from the invasion of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Biological Conservation 78:23-33.
19. Johnstone, I. M., B. T. Coffey, and C. Howard-Williams. 1985. The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: a New Zealand case study. Journal of Environmental Management 20:263-279.
20. Kennedy, T. A., S. Naeem, K. M. Howe, J. M. H. Knops, D. Tilman, and P. Reich. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417:636-638.
21. Kolar, C. S., and D. M. Lodge. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:199-204.
22. Kolar, C. S., and D. M. Lodge. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233-1236.
23. Kraft, C. E., P. J. Sullivan, A. Y. Karatayev, L. E. Burlakova, J. C. Nekola, L. E. Johnson, and D. K. Padilla. 2002. Landscape patterns of an aquatic invader: assessing dispersal extent from spatial distributions. Ecological Applications 12:749-759.
24. Leppäkoski, E., S. Gollasch, P. Gruszka, H. Ojaveer, S. Olenin, and V. Panov. 2002. The Baltic - a sea of invaders. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1175-1188.
25. Levine, J. M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:852-854.
26. Levine, J. M. 2001. Local interactions, dispersal, and native and exotic plant diversity along a California stream. Oikos 95:397-408.
27. Levine, J. M., and C. M. D'Antonio. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15-26.
28. Lewis, M. A. 1997. Variability, patchiness, and jump dispersal in the spread of an invading population. Pages 46-69 in D. Tilman and P. Karieva, editors. Spatial ecology. The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Monographs in Population Biology 30. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
29. Linneman, H. V. 1966. An econometric study of international trade flows. North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
30. Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522-1536.
31. Lyons, K. G., and M. W. Schwartz. 2001. Rare species loss alters ecosystem function - invasion resistance. Ecology Letters 4:358-365.
32. MacIsaac, H. J., H. A. M. Ketelaars, I. A. Grigorovich, C. W. Ramcharan, and N. D. Yan. 2000. Modeling Bythotrephes longimanus invasions in the Great Lakes basin based on its European distribution. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 149: 1-21.
33. MacIsaac, H. J., T. C. Robbins, and M. A. Lewis. 2002. Modeling ships' ballast water as invasion threats to the Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:1245-1256.
34. Reilly, W. J. 1931. The law of retail gravitation. Knickerbocker Press, New York, New York, USA.
35. Ricciardi, A. 2001. Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an "invasional meltdown" occurring in the Great Lakes? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:2513-2525.
36. Ruiz, G. M., P. W. Fofonoff, J. T. Carlton, M. J. Wonham, and A. H. Hines. 2000. Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 481-531.
37. Sakai, A. K., et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 305-332.
38. Sala, O. E., et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770-1774.
39. Schneider, D. W., C. D. Ellis, and K. S. Cummings. 1998. A transportation model assessment of the risk to native mussel communities from zebra mussel spread. Conservation Biology 12:788-800.
40. Shigesada, N., and K. Kawasaki. 1997. Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
41. Shurin, J. B. 2000. Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81:3074-3085.
42. Smith, L. D., M. J. Wonham, L. D. McCann, G. M. Ruiz, A. H. Hines, and J. T. Carlton. 1999. Invasion pressure to a ballast-flooded estuary and an assessment of inoculant survival. Biological Invasions 1:67-87.
43. Suarez, A. V., D. A. Holway, and T. J. Case. 2001. Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:1095-1100.
44. Therriault, T. W., I. A. Grigorovich, M. E. Cristescu, H. A. M. Ketelaars, M. Viljanen, D. D. Heath, and H. J. MacIsaac. 2002. Taxonomic resolution of the genus Bythotrephes Leydig using molecular markers and re-evaluation of its global distribution. Diversity and Distributions 8:67-84.
45. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
46. Williamson, M., and A. Fitter. 1996. The characteristics of successful invaders. Biological Conservation 78:163-170.
47. Wonham, M. J., W. C. Walton, G. M. Ruiz, A. M. Frese, and B. S. Galil. 2001. Going to the source: role of the invasion pathway in determining potential invaders. Marine Ecology Progress Series 215:1-12.
48. Yan, N. D., A. Blukacz, W. G. Sprules, P. K. Kindy, D. Hackett, R. E. Girard, and B. J. Clark. 2001. Changes in zooplankton and the phenology of the spiny waterflea, Bythotrephes, following its invasion of Harp Lake, Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:2341-2350.
49. Yan, N. D., R. Girard, and S. Boudreau. 2002. An introduced invertebrate predator (Bythotrephes) reduces zooplankton diversity. Ecology Letters 5:481-485.
50. Yan, N. D., and T. W. Pawson. 1998. Seasonal variation in the size and abundance of the invading Bythotrephes in Harp Lake, Ontario, Canada. Hydrobiologia 361:157-168.
51. Zipf, G. K. 1946. The P1P2/D hypothesis: on the intercity movement of persons. American Sociological Review 11: 677-686.