메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1192-1194

Challenging the genetically homogeneous individual

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 8144220205     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00815.x     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (9)

References (17)
  • 1
    • 0022240340 scopus 로고
    • The population genetics of somatic mutations in plants
    • Antolin, M.F. & Strobeck, C. 1985. The population genetics of somatic mutations in plants. Am. Nat. 126: 52-62.
    • (1985) Am. Nat. , vol.126 , pp. 52-62
    • Antolin, M.F.1    Strobeck, C.2
  • 2
    • 0032032051 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evolution in mitotic cell-lineages in multicellular organisms
    • Fagerström, T., Briscoe, D.A. & Sunnucks, P. 1998. Evolution in mitotic cell-lineages in multicellular organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 117-120.
    • (1998) Trends Ecol. Evol. , vol.13 , pp. 117-120
    • Fagerström, T.1    Briscoe, D.A.2    Sunnucks, P.3
  • 3
    • 8144222264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Much ado about nothing... so far?
    • doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00812.x
    • Hutchings, M.J. & Booth, D. 2004. Much ado about nothing... so far? J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00812.x.
    • (2004) J. Evol. Biol.
    • Hutchings, M.J.1    Booth, D.2
  • 5
    • 0034914782 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Somatic mutations in organisms with complex life histories
    • Orive, M.E. 2001. Somatic mutations in organisms with complex life histories. Theor. Popul. Biol. 59: 235-249.
    • (2001) Theor. Popul. Biol. , vol.59 , pp. 235-249
    • Orive, M.E.1
  • 6
    • 7344247705 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mutation and selection within the individual
    • Otto, S.P. & Hastings, I.M. 1998. Mutation and selection within the individual. Genetics 102/103: 507-524.
    • (1998) Genetics , vol.102-103 , pp. 507-524
    • Otto, S.P.1    Hastings, I.M.2
  • 7
    • 0028872002 scopus 로고
    • Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual
    • Otto, S.P. & Orive, M.E. 1995. Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual. Genetics 141: 1173-1187.
    • (1995) Genetics , vol.141 , pp. 1173-1187
    • Otto, S.P.1    Orive, M.E.2
  • 8
    • 8144231088 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Intraorganismal genetic heterogeneity: Is it a useful concept?
    • doi: 10.1111/ j.1420-9101.2004.00810.x
    • Pannell, J.R. & Eppley, S.M. 2004. Intraorganismal genetic heterogeneity: is it a useful concept? J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/ j.1420-9101.2004.00810.x.
    • (2004) J. Evol. Biol.
    • Pannell, J.R.1    Eppley, S.M.2
  • 9
    • 0036431857 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cell lineage dynamics in stratified shoot apical meristems
    • Pineda-Krch, M. & Lehtilä, K. 2002. Cell lineage dynamics in stratified shoot apical meristems. J. Theor. Biol. 219: 495-505.
    • (2002) J. Theor. Biol. , vol.219 , pp. 495-505
    • Pineda-Krch, M.1    Lehtilä, K.2
  • 10
    • 2342468340 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Costs and benefits of genetic heterogeneity within organisms
    • doi: 10.1111/ j.1420-9101.2004.00808.x
    • Pineda-Krch, M. & Lehtilä, K. 2004. Costs and benefits of genetic heterogeneity within organisms. J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/ j.1420-9101.2004.00808.x.
    • (2004) J. Evol. Biol.
    • Pineda-Krch, M.1    Lehtilä, K.2
  • 11
    • 8144227920 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Will two walk together, except they have agreed? Amos 3:3
    • doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2004.00809.x
    • Rinkevich, B. 2004. Will two walk together, except they have agreed? Amos 3:3. J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2004.00809.x.
    • (2004) J. Evol. Biol.
    • Rinkevich, B.1
  • 12
    • 0033120616 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How many kinds of individual are there?
    • Santelices, B. 1999. How many kinds of individual are there? Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 152-155.
    • (1999) Trends Ecol. Evol. , vol.14 , pp. 152-155
    • Santelices, B.1
  • 13
    • 8144221580 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mosaicism and chimerism as components of intraorganismal genetic heterogeneity
    • doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00813.x
    • Santelices, B. 2004. Mosaicism and chimerism as components of intraorganismal genetic heterogeneity. J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2004.00813.x.
    • (2004) J. Evol. Biol.
    • Santelices, B.1
  • 14
    • 8144228997 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Genetic conflicts and intercellular heterogeneity
    • doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00814.x
    • Strassmann, J.E. & Queller, D.C. 2004. Genetic conflicts and intercellular heterogeneity. J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00814. x.
    • (2004) J. Evol. Biol.
    • Strassmann, J.E.1    Queller, D.C.2
  • 15
    • 8144223344 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Genetic heterogeneity within organisms and the evolution of individuality
    • doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00811.x
    • Tuomi, J. 2004. Genetic heterogeneity within organisms and the evolution of individuality. J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00811.x.
    • (2004) J. Evol. Biol.
    • Tuomi, J.1
  • 16
    • 0024531480 scopus 로고
    • What are the units of selection in modular organisms?
    • Tuomi, J. & Vuorisalo, T. 1989. What are the units of selection in modular organisms? Oikos 54: 227-233.
    • (1989) Oikos , vol.54 , pp. 227-233
    • Tuomi, J.1    Vuorisalo, T.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.