Genetic heterogeneity within organisms and the evolution of individuality

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1182-1183

  Tuomi, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; NOTE; PHENOTYPE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 8144223344     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00811.x     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Bonner, J.T. 2000. First Signals. The Evolution of Multicellular Development. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Buss, L.W. 1987. The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
3. Dawkins, R. 1982. Replicators and vehicles. In: Current Problems in Sociobiology (King's College Sociobiology Group, ed.), pp. 45-64. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Dawkins, R. 1989. The Selfish Gene, New edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Grime, J.P. & Mackey, J.M.L. 2002. The role plasticity in resource capture by plants. Evol. Ecol. 16: 299-307.
6. Huxley, J.S. 1949. Individuality. Encyclopedia Britannica 12: 256-257.
7. Michod, R.E. 1999. Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
8. Pineda-Krch, M. & Lehtilä, K. 2004. Costs and benefits of genetic heterogeneity within organisms. J. Evol. Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2004.00808.x.
9. Suomela, J. & Ayers, M.P. 1994. Within-tree and among-tree variation in leaf characteristics of mountain birch and its implications for herbivory. Oikos 70: 212-222.
10. Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.