Group-level effects of facilitating conditions on individual acceptance of information systems

Information Technology and Management

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 315-334

  Park, Sung Hee Sunny ^a   Lee, Lorraine ^b   Yi, Mun Y ^c  

^a DALTON STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

^c Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Facilitating conditions; Hierarchical linear modeling; IT implementation; Multilevel modeling; Technology adoption; Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355161672     PISSN: 1385951X     EISSN: 15737667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10799-011-0097-2     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aitkin M, Longford N (1986) Statistical modeling issues in school effectiveness studies. J R Stat Soc Ser A 149: 1-43.
2. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50: 179-211.
3. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103: 411-423.
4. Aubert B, Barki H, Patry M, Roy V (2008) A multi-level, multi-theory perspective of information technology implementation. Inf Syst J 18: 45-72.
5. Bagozzi RP (2007) The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Syst 8: 244-254.
6. Bhattacherjee A, Premkumar G (2004) Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Q 28: 229-254.
7. Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: a multilevel perspective. MIS Q 31: 657-679.
8. Cattell RB (1966) The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In: Cattell RB (ed) Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago.
9. Cho S, Mathiassen L (2007) The role of industry infrastructure in telehealth innovations: a multi-level analysis of a telestroke program. Eur J Inf Syst 16: 738-750.
10. Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Res 16: 64-73.
11. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Erlbaum, Mahwah.
12. Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q 19: 189-211.
13. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 31: 93-96.
14. deLeeuw J, Kreft I (1986) Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis. J Educ Stat 11: 57-85.
15. deLeeuw J, Meijer E (2008) Handbook of multilevel analysis. Springer, New York.
16. Fornell C, Larcker DG (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 19: 39-50.
17. Gefen D, Ragowsky A (2005) A multi-level approach to measuring the benefits of an ERP system in manufacturing firms. Inf Syst Manag 22: 18-25.
18. Hatcher L (1994) A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Publishing, Cary.
19. Hinkin TR (1995) A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. J Manag 21: 967-988.
20. Horn JL (1965) A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30: 179-186.
21. Igbaria M, Zinatelli N, Cragg P, Cavaye ALM (1997) Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Q 21: 279-302.
22. James LR (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J Appl Psychol 67: 219-229.
23. Koste LL, Malhotra M, Sharma S (2004) Measuring dimensions of manufacturing flexibility. J Oper Manag 22: 171-196.
24. Kozlowski S, Klein K (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (eds) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
25. Lai V, Guynes J (1997) An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: a discriminative approach. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 44: 146-157.
26. Lapointe L, Rivard S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Q 29: 461-491.
27. Markus LM, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Manag Sci 34: 583-598.
28. Mason WM, Wong GM, Entwistle B (1983) Contextual analysis through the multilevel linear model. In: Leinhardt S (ed) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 72-103.
29. Mellarkod V, Appan R, Jones DR, Sherif K (2007) A multi-level analysis of factors affecting software developers' intention to reuse software assets: an empirical investigation. Inf Manag 44: 613-625.
30. Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 2: 192-222.
31. Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (1999) The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad Manag Rev 24: 249-265.
32. Netemeyer R, Bearden B, Sharma S (2003) Scaling procedures. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
33. Niederman F, Davis A, Wynn D, York PT (2006) A research agenda for studying open source: a multi-level framework. Commun AIS 18: 2-38.
34. Nunnaly J (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
35. Pare G, Elam JJ (1995) Discretionary use of personal computers by knowledge workers: testing of a social psychological theoretical model. Behav Inf Technol 14: 215-228.
36. Pavlou PA, Zheng E, Gu B (2010) Latent growth modeling in IS research: basic tenets, illustration, and practical guidelines. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 269, 2010 (http://www. aisel. aisnet. org/icis2010_submissions/269).
37. Ployhart RE (2005) Hierarchical models. In: Everitt BS, Howell DC (eds) The encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Wiley, Chichester, pp 810-816.
38. Ployhart RE, Pitariu A (2007) Hierarchical linear modeling. In: Rogelberg S (ed) Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 494-497.
39. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
40. Rogers EM (1995) Innovation in organizations. In: Rogers E (ed) Chapter 10 in diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, pp 371-404.
41. Sarker S, Valacich JS, Sarker S (2005) Technology adoption by groups: a valence perspective. J Assoc Inf Syst 6: 37-71.
42. Sykes TA, Venkatesh V, Gosain S (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: a social network perspective to understand employees' system use. MIS Q 33: 371-393.
43. Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Q 19: 561-570.
44. Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res 6: 144-176.
45. Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell JM (1991) Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q 15: 124-143.
46. Triandis HC (1980) Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In: Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1979: beliefs, attitudes, and values. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 195-259.
47. Vallerand RJ (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: Zanna M (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 29. Academic Press, New York, pp 271-360.
48. Venkatesh V (1999) Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Q 23: 239-260.
49. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27: 425-478.