The role of industry infrastructure in telehealth innovations: A multi-level analysis of a telestroke program

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 738-750

  Cho, Sunyoung ^a   Mathiassen, Lars ^b  

^a VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Healthcare industry; Industry infrastructure; Multi level analysis; Telehealth innovations

Indexed keywords

EID: 37249005753     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000718     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. AARTS J, PEEL V and WRIGHT G (1998) Organizational issues in health informatics: a model approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics 52(3), 235-242.
2. ADEWALE OS (2004) An internet-based telemedicine system in Nigeria. International Journal of Information Management 24(3), 221-234.
3. ANDERSON JG (1997) Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems. Communications of the ACM 40(8), 83-90.
4. AVGEROU C (2001) The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Information Systems Journal 11, 43-63.
5. AVGEROU C and MADON S (2004) Framing IS studies: understanding the social context of IS innovation. In The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology (AVGEROU C, CIBORRA C and LAND F, Eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. BALI RK and NAGUIB RNG (2001) Towards gestalt telehealth: considering social, ethical and cultural issues. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2, 1367-1371.
7. BASHSHUR RL (2000) Telemedicine nomenclature: what does it mean? Telemedicine Journal 6(1), 1-3.
8. BERG M (2001) Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics 64(2-3), 143-156.
9. BROWN HG, POOLE MS and RODGERS TL (2004) Interpersonal traits, complementarity, and trust in virtual collaboration. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(4), 115-137.
10. CASPER ML, BARNETT E, WILLIAMS GI Jr., HALVERSON JA, BRAHAM VE and GREENLUND KJ, (January 2003) Atlas of Stroke Mortality: Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Disparities in the United States In SERVICES DOHAH (Ed), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
11. CHAU PYK and HU PJ-H (2004) Technology implementation for telemedicine programs. Communications of the ACM 47(2), 87.
12. CHIASSON MW and DAVIDSON E (2004) Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research. Information and Organization 14(3), 155-188.
13. CHIASSON MW and DAVIDSON E (2005) Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 29(4), 591-605.
14. CHO S, MATHIASSEN L and ROBEY D (2007) Dialectics of resilience: a multilevel analysis of a telehealth innovation. Journal of Information Technology 22(1), 24-35.
15. CONSTANTINIDES P and BARRETT M (2006) Negotiating ICT development and use: the case of a telemedicine system in the healthcare region of crete. Information and Organization 16(1), 27-55.
16. COOPER RB and ZMUD RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36(2), 123-139.
17. COVI L and KLING R (1996) Organizational dimensions of effective digital library use: closed rational and open natural systems models. Journal of American Society for Information Systems 47(9), 672-689.
18. CROWSTON K and MYERS MD (2004) Information technology and the transformation of industries: three research perspectives. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13, 5-28.
19. DARKE P, SHANKS G and BROADBENT M (1998) Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal 8(4), 273-289.
20. DAVIDSON EJ (2000) Analyzing genre of organizational communication in clinical information systems. Information, Technology, and People 13(3), 196-209.
21. DIMAGGIO PJ and POWELL WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2), 147-160.
22. HU PJ, CHAU PYK, SHENG OR and TAM KY (1999) Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(2), 91-112.
23. KWON TH and ZMUD RW (1987) Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. In Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (BOLAND RJ and HIRSCHEIM RA, Eds), pp 227-251, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
24. LAMB R, KING JL and KLING R (2003) Informational environments: organizational contexts of online information use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(2), 97-114.
25. LIANG H, XUE Y and BERGER BA (2006) Web-based intervention support system for health promotion. Decision Support Systems 42, 435-449.
26. LORENZI NM and RILEY RT (2003) Organizational ISSUES = change. International Journal of Medical Informatics 69(2-3), 197-203.
27. LORENZI NM, RILEY RT, BLYTH AJC, SOUTHON G and DIXON BJ (1997) Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 4(2), 79-93.
28. MAHEU MM, WHITTEN P and ALLEN A (2001) E-Health, Telehealth, and Telemedicine: A Guide to Start-Up and Success. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
29. MASON J (2002) Qualitative Researching. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
30. MBARIKA VWA (2004) Is telemedicine the panacea for sub-saharan Africa's medical nightmare? Communications of the ACM 47(7), 21-24.
31. MENON NM, LEE B and ELDENBURG L (2000) Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry. Information Systems Research 11(1), 83-92.
32. MILES MB and HUBERMAN AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
33. PAUL DL (2006) Collaborative activities in virtual settings: a knowledge management perspective of telemedicine. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(4), 143-176.
34. PAUL DL and MCDANIEL Jr. RR (2004) A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quarterly 26(2), 183-227.
35. RAGHUPATHI W (1997) Health care information systems. Communications of the ACM 40(8), 80-82.
36. SHELDON I. DORENFEST çurrçhar38 ASSOCIATES, LTD (2004) Healthcare Information Technology Spending is Growing Rapidly. Sheldon I. Dorenfest & Associates, Ltd., http://dorenfest.com/doc/pressrelease-Feb2004.pdf.
37. TANRIVERDI H and IACONO CS (1998) Knowledge barriers to diffusion of telemedicine. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (DE GROSS JI, HIRSCHHEIM R and NEWMAN M, Eds), pp 39-50, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, USA.
38. THE AMERICAN STROKE ASSOCIATION (2006) Stroke Facts 2006: All Americans. The American Stroke Association, www.americanheart.org/ downloadable/heart/1136904345451AllAmstrokeFacts06.pdf.
39. VAN DE VEN AH (2005) Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive technologies. MIS Quarterly 29(2), 365-378.
40. VAN DE VEN AH and GARUD R (1989) Innovation and industry development: the case of cochlear implants. Research on Technological Innovation Management and Policy 4, 295-325.
41. VAN DE VEN AH and HARGRAVE TJ (2004) Social, technical, and institutional change: a literature review and synthesis. In Handbook of Organizationl Change and Innovation (POOLE MS and VAN DE VEN AH, Eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.
42. VAN DE VEN AH, POLLEY DE, GARUD R and VENKATARAMAN S (1999) Building an infrastructure for the innovation journey. In The Innovation Journey (Eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.
43. WALSHAM G (1995) Interpretive case study in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4(2), 74-81.
44. YIN RK (2003) Case Study Research Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Inc, Beverly Hills, CA.