Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviors among African American women who have sex with women: Does sex with men make a difference?

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1118-1125

  Muzny, Christina A ^a,b   Sunesara, Imran R ^b   Martin, David H ^c   Mena, Leandro A ^b  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; BISEXUAL MALE; CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS; CHLAMYDIASIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GONORRHEA; HUMAN; LESBIAN; MYCOPLASMA GENITALIUM; NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE; PREVALENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RISK; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SYPHILIS; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS; TRICHOMONIASIS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; BISEXUALITY; FEMALE; HOMOSEXUALITY, FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MISSISSIPPI; PREVALENCE; RISK-TAKING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81355149615     PISSN: 01485717     EISSN: 15374521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31822e6179     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Epstein AM. Rolling down the runway: the challenges ahead for quality report cards. JAMA. 1998;279:1691-1696. (Pubitemid 28247290)
2. Ferris TG, Torchiana DF. Public release of clinical outcomes data-online CABG report cards. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1593-1595.
3. Chassin MR, Hannan EL, DeBuono BA. Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:394-398. (Pubitemid 26049596)
4. Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Racz M, et al. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA. 1994;271:761-766. (Pubitemid 24074523)
5. Hannan EL, Kumar D, Racz M, et al. New York State's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System-4 years later. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:1852-1857. (Pubitemid 24379027)
6. Mukamel DB, Mushlin AI. Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State cardiac surgery mortality reports. Med Care. 1998;36:945-954. (Pubitemid 128456434)
7. Shahian DM, Normand SL, Torchiana DF, et al. Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:2155-2168. (Pubitemid 34002965)
8. Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, et al. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:111-123. (Pubitemid 351651554)
9. Epstein AJ. Do cardiac surgery report cards reduce mortality? Assessing the evidence. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:403-426. (Pubitemid 44035788)
10. Luft HS, Garnick DW, Mark DH, et al. Does quality influence choice of hospital? JAMA. 1990;263:2899-2906.
11. Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res. 1987;22:157-182. (Pubitemid 17138049)
12. Romano PS, Zhou H. Do well-publicized risk-adjusted outcomes reports affect hospital volume? Med Care. 2004;42:367-377.
13. Chassin MR. Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21:40-51.
14. Cutler DA, Huckman RS, Landrum MB. The role of information in medical markets: an analysis of publicly reported outcomes in cardiac surgery. Am Econ Rev. 2004;94:342-346. (Pubitemid 39057115)
15. Dranove D, Kessler D, McClellan M, et al. Is more information better? The effects of "report cards" on health care providers. J Political Econ. 2003;111:555-588. (Pubitemid 36967717)
16. Omoigui NA, Miller DP, Brown KJ, et al. Outmigration for coronary bypass surgery in an era of public dissemination of clinical outcomes. Circulation. 1996;93:27-33. (Pubitemid 26006564)
17. Apolito RA, Greenberg MA, Menegus MA, et al. Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2008; 155:267-273.
18. Li Z, Carlisle DM, Marcin JP, et al. Impact of public reporting on access to coronary artery bypass surgery: the California Outcomes Reporting Program. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1131-1138.
19. Damberg CL, Chung RE, Steimle AE. The California Report on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: 1997 to 1998 Hospital Data, Technical Report. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Business Group on Health and the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development; 2001. Available at: http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/HID/Products/PatDischargeData/CABG/97-98Technical.pdf; Accessed August 12, 2011.
20. Damberg CL, Danielsen B, Parker JP, et al. The California Report on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: 1999 Hospital Data, Technical Report. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Business Group on Health and the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development; 2003. Available at: http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/HID/Products/PatDischarge Data/CABG/99Summary.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2011.
21. Parker JP, Li Z, Damberg CL, et al. The California Report on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery 2000 to 2002 Hospital Data. San Francisco, CA: California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development and the Pacific Business Group on Health, February 2005. Available at: http://www.pbgh.org/ storage/documents/reports/CABG-FullReport.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2011.
22. Parker JP, Li Z, Damberg CL, et al. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California. Med Care. 2006;44:687-695. (Pubitemid 44284283)
23. Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA. 1998;279: 1638-1642. (Pubitemid 28248590)
24. Hannan EL, Stone CC, Biddle TL, et al. Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: what do New York state cardiologists think of it? Am Heart J. 1997;134:1120-1128. (Pubitemid 28040203)
25. Tu JV, Cameron C. Impact of an acute myocardial infarction report card in Ontario, Canada. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:131-137. (Pubitemid 36432376)
26. Mukamel DB, Mushlin AI. The impact of quality report cards on choice of physicians, hospitals, and HMOs: a midcourse evaluation. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001;27:20-27.
27. Baker DW, Einstadter D, Thomas C, et al. The effect of publicly reporting hospital performance on market share and risk-adjusted mortality at high-mortality hospitals. Med Care. 2003;41:729-740.
28. Vladeck BC, Goodwin EJ, Myers LP, et al. Consumers and hospital use: the HCFA "death list". Health Aff (Millwood). 1988;7:122-125.
29. Mennemeyer ST, Morrisey MA, Howard LZ. Death and reputation: how consumers acted upon HCFA mortality information. Inquiry. 1997;34: 117-128. (Pubitemid 27335316)
30. Fairlie RW. Is there a digital divide? Ethnic and racial differences in access to technology and possible explanations. Final Report to the University of California Latino Policy Institute and California Policy Research Center, November 2003. Available at: http://cjtc.ucsc.edu/docs/r-techreport5.pdf . Accessed August 13, 2011.
31. Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Hannan EL, Gormley CJ, et al. Mortality in Medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation. JAMA. 2002;288:1859-1866. (Pubitemid 35168141)
32. DiSesa VJ, O'Brien SM, Welke KF, et al. Contemporary impact of state certificate-of-need regulations for cardiac surgery: an analysis using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' National Cardiac Surgery Database. Circulation. 2006;114:2122-2129. (Pubitemid 44747892)
33. Chernew M, Scanlon D, Hayward R. Insurance type and choice of hospital for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Health Serv Res. 1998;33(3 Pt 1):447-466.
34. Escarce JJ, Van Horn RL, Pauly MV, et al. Health maintenance organizations and hospital quality for coronary artery bypass surgery. Med Care Res Rev. 1999;56:340-362. (Pubitemid 29404268)
35. Hannan EL, Sarrazin MSV, Doran DR, et al. Provider profiling and quality improvement efforts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery-The effect on short-term mortality among medicare beneficiaries. Med Care. 2003;41:1164-1172.
36. Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Jollis JG, et al. The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:993-999. (Pubitemid 28459590)
37. O'Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1996;275:841-846. (Pubitemid 26087220)
38. Baker DW, Einstadter D, Thomas CL, et al. Mortality trends during a program that publicly reported hospital performance. Med Care. 2002; 40:879-890.
39. Choi N. Relationship between health service use and health information technology use among older adults: Analysis of the US National Health Interview Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e33.
40. Burack JH, Impellizzeri P, Homel P, et al. Public reporting of surgical mortality: a survey of New York State cardiothoracic surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1195-1200.
41. Romano P, Marcin JP, Mahendra G, et al. The Impact of Mandatory Public Reporting on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Case Selection and Outcomes in California. Sacramento, CA: 2010. Available at: http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/HID/ Products/Clinical-Data/CABG/2007/CCORP-Impact.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2011.