Do cardiac surgery report cards reduce mortality? Assessing the evidence

Medical Care Research and Review

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 403-426

  Epstein, Andrew J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac surgery; Quality improvement; Report cards

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART SURGERY; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MORTALITY; PATIENT CARE; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BENCHMARKING; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NEW YORK; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; SURGERY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745852775     PISSN: 10775587     EISSN: 15526801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077558706288831     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Abramov, D., M. G. Tamariz, S. E. Fremes, V. Guru, M. A. Borger, G. T. Christakis, G. Bhatnagar, J. Y. Sever, and B. S. Goldman. 2000. Trends in coronary artery bypass surgery results: A recent 9-year study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 70 (1): 84-90.
2. Bentley, J. M., and D. B. Nash. 1998. How Pennsylvania hospitals have responded to publicly released report cards on coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 24 (1): 40-49.
3. Burack, J. H., P. Impellizzeri, P. Homel, and J. N. Cunningham Jr. 1999. Public reporting of surgical mortality: A survey of New York State cardiothoracic surgeons. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 68 (4): 1195-1202.
4. Chassin, M. 2002a. Achieving and sustaining improved quality: Lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. Health Affairs 21 (4): 40-51.
5. _. 2002b. Reply to letter to the editor. Health Affairs 21 (5): 306.
6. Chassin, M. R., E. L. Hannan, and B. A. DeBuono. 1996. Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. New England Journal of Medicine 334 (6): 394-98.
7. Cutler, D. M., R. S. Huckman, and M. B. Landrum. 2004. The role of information in medical markets: An analysis of publicly reported outcomes in cardiac surgery. American Economic Review 94 (2): 342-46.
8. Dranove, D. 2002. Letter to the editor. Health Affairs 21 (5): 305-6.
9. Dranove, D., D. Kessler, M. McClellan, and M. Satterthwaite. 2003. Is more information better? The effects of 'report cards' on health care providers. Journal of Political Economy 111 (3): 555-88.
10. Dziuban, S. W., J. B. McIlduff, S. J. Miller, and R. H. Dal Col. 1994. How a New York cardiac surgery program uses outcomes data. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 58 (6): 1871-76.
11. Epstein, A. J. 2004. Understanding incentives for responding to report cards. Ch. 3 in Responses to cardiac surgery mortality report cards. Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
12. Erickson, L. C., D. F. Torchiana, E. C. Schneider, J. W. Newburger, and E. L. Hannan. 2000. The relationship between managed care insurance and use of lower-mortality hospitals for CABG surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association 283 (15): 1976-82.
13. Ferguson, T. B., B. G. Hammill, E. D. Peterson, E. R. DeLong, and F. L. Grover. 2002. A decade of change - risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: A report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 73 (2): 480-90.
14. Foreman, S., D. Kenkel, and D. Shea. 1995. Cost and quality information and health care market reform. In Advances in health economics and health services research, edited by R. M. Scheffler and L. F. Rossiter, 137-53. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15. Gaskin, D. J., J. J. Escarce, K. S. Schulman, and J. Hadley. 2002. The determinants of HMOs' contracting with hospitals for bypass surgery. Health Services Research 37 (4): 963-84.
16. General Accounting Office. 1994. GAO/HEHS-94-219: Health care reform: "Report cards" are useful but significant issues need to be addressed. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
17. _. 1999. GAO/HEHS-99-178: Physician performance: Report cards under development but challenges remain. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
18. Ghali, W. A., A. S. Ash, R. E. Hall, and M. A. Moskowitz. 1997. Statewide quality improvement initiatives and mortality after cardiac surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association 277 (5): 379-82.
19. Glance, L. G., and T. M. Osler. 2001. Comparing outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery: Is the New York Cardiac Surgery Reporting System sensitive to changes in case-mix? Critical Care Medicine 29 (11): 2090-96.
20. Green, J., and N. Wintfield. 1995. Report cards on cardiac surgeons - assessing New York State's approach. New England Journal of Medicine 332 (18): 1229-32.
21. Grunkemier, G. L., K. J. Zerr, and R. Jin. 2001. Cardiac surgery report cards: Making the grade. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 72 (6): 1845-48.
22. Guadagnino, C. 2002. Utility of PHC4's CABG report. Physician's News Digest June. Retrieved November 21, 2005, from http://www.physiciansnews.com/ cover/602.html.
23. Hannan, E. L., and M. R. Chassin. 2005. Letter to the editor. Journal of the American Medical Association 293 (24): 2999-3000.
24. Hannan, E. L., H. Kilburn Jr., M. L. Lindsey and R. Lewis. 1992. Clinical versus administrative data bases for CABG surgery. Medical Care 30 (10): 892-907.
25. Hannan, E. L., H. Kilburn Jr., M. Racz, E. Shields, and M. R. Chassin. 1994. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery New York State. Journal of the American Medical Association 271 (10): 761-66.
26. Hannan, E. L., D. Kumar, M. Racz, A. L. Siu, and M. R. Chassin. 1994. New York State's cardiac surgery reporting system: Four years later. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 58 (6): 1852-57.
27. Hannan, E. L., M. J. Racz, J. G. Jollis, and E. D. Peterson. 1997. Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: Does it work well enough? Health Services Research 31 (6): 659-78.
28. Hannan, E. L., A. L. Siu, D. Kumar, H. Kilburn Jr., and M. R. Chassin. 1995. The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State: The role of surgeon volume. Journal of the American Medical Association 273 (3): 209-13.
29. Hannan, E. L., A. L. Siu, D. Kumar, M. Racz, D. B. Pryor, and M. R. Chassin. 1997. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft surgery performance in New York: Is there a bias against taking high-risk patients? Medical Care 35 (1): 49-56.
30. Hannan, E. L., C. Stone, T. L. Biddle, and B. A. DeBuono. 1997. Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: What do New York State cardiologists think of it? American Heart Journal 134 (6): 1120-28.
31. Hannan, E. L., M. S. Vaughn Sarrazin, D. R. Doran, and G. E. Rosenthal. 2003. Provider profiling and quality improvement efforts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: The effect on short-term mortality among Medicare beneficiaries. Medical Care 41 (10): 1164-72.
32. Harlan, B. J. 2001. Statewide reporting of coronary artery surgery results: A view from California. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 121 (3): 409-17.
33. Hartz, A. J., E. M. Kuhn, and H. Krakauer. 1996. The relationship of the value of outcome comparisons to the number of patients per provider. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 9 (4): 247-54.
34. Hartz, A. J., E. M. Kuhn, and J. Pulido. 1999. Prestige of training programs and experience of bypass surgeons as factors in adjusted patient mortality rates. Medical Care 37 (1): 93-103.
35. Hibbard, J. H., J. Stockard, and M. Tusler. 2003. Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Affairs 22 (2): 84-94.
36. _. 2005a. It isn't just about choice: The potential of a public performance report to affect the public image of hospitals. Medical Care Research and Review 62 (3): 358-71.
37. _. 2005b. Hospital performance reports: Impact on quality, market share and reputation. Health Affairs 24 (4): 1150-60.
38. Hofer, T. P., and R. A. Hayward. 1996. Identifying poor quality hospitals: Can hospital mortality rates detect quality problems for medical diagnoses? Medical Care 34 (8): 737-53.
39. Holman, W. L., R. M. Allman, M. Sansom, C. I. Kiefe, E. D. Peterson, K. J. Anstrom, S. S. Sankey, S. G. Hubbard, and R. G. Sherrill for the Alabama CABG Study Group. 2001. Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: Results of a statewide quality improvement initiative. Journal of the American Medical Association 285 (23): 3003-10.
40. Jauhar, S. 2003. When doctors slam the door. New York Times, 16 March, sec.6, p. 2.
41. Jha, A. K., and A. M. Epstein. 2004. The predictive accuracy of the New York coronary bypass report card and its impact on volume and surgical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 19 (S1): 223.
42. Jollis, J. G., and P. S. Romano. 1998. Pennsylvania's focus on heart attack - grading the scorecard. New England Journal of Medicine 338 (14): 983-87.
43. Leventis, A. V. 1998. Cardiac surgeons under the knife: A patient selection hypothesis. Ch. 1 in Job performance and behavior: Three empirical examinations of productivity and incentive response. Ph.D. diss., Princeton University.
44. Localio, A. R., B. H. Hamory, A. C. Fisher, and T. R. TenHave. 1997. The public release of hospital and physician mortality data in Pennsylvania: A case study. Medical Care 35 (3): 272-86.
45. Luft, H. S., D. W. Garnick, D. H. Mark, D. J. Peltzman, C. S. Phibbs, E. Lichtenberg, and S. J. McPhee. 1990. Does quality influence choice of hospital? Journal of the American Medical Association 263 (21): 2899-906.
46. Luft, H. S., and P. S. Romano. 1993. Chance, continuity, and change in hospital mortality rates. Journal of the American Medical Association 270 (3): 331-37.
47. Marshall, M. N., P. G. Shekelle, S. Leatherman, and R. H. Brook. 2000. The public release of performance data: What do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. Journal of the American Medical Association 283 (14): 1866-74.
48. Maxwell, C. I. 1998. Public disclosure of performance information in Pennsylvania: Impact on hospital charges and the views of hospital executives. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 24 (9): 491-502.
49. McNeil, B. J., S. H. Pedersen, and C. Gatsonis. 1992. Current issues in profiling quality of care. Inquiry 29 (3): 298-307.
50. Moscucci, M., K. A. Eagle, D. Share, D. Smith, A. C. De Franco, M. O'Donnell, E. Kline-Rogers, S. M. Jani, and D. L. Brown. 2005. Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions: An analysis from two large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 45 (11): 1759-65.
51. Mukamel, D. B., and A. I. Mushlin. 1998. Quality of care information makes a difference: An analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State cardiac surgery mortality reports. Medical Care 36 (7): 945-54.
52. _. 2001. The impact of quality report cards on choice of physicians, hospitals, and HMOs: A midcourse evaluation. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 27 (1): 20-27.
53. Mukamel, D. B., A. I. Mushlin, D. Weimer, J. Zwanziger, T. Parker, and I. Indridason. 2000. Do quality report cards play a role in HMOs' contracting practices? Evidence from New York State. Health Services Research 35 (1, Part II): 319-32.
54. Mukamel, D. B., D. L. Weimer, J. Zwanziger, S. F. H. Gorthy and A. I. Mushlin. 2004. Quality report cards, selection of cardiac surgeons and racial disparities: A study of the publication of the New York State cardiac surgery reports. Inquiry 41 (4): 435-46.
55. Mukamel D.B., D.L. Weimer, J. Zwanziger, and A. I. Mushlin. 2002. Quality of cardiac surgeons and managed care contracting practices. Health Services Research 37 (5): 1129-44.
56. Narins, C. R., A. M. Dozier, F. S. Ling, and W. Zareba. 2005. The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians. Archives of Internal Medicine 165 (1): 83-87.
57. O'Connor, G. T., S. K. Plume, E. M. Olmstead, J. R. Morton, C. T. Maloney, W. C. Nugent, F. Hernandez Jr., R. Clough, B. J. Leavitt, L. H. Coffin, C. A. S. Marrin, D. Wennberg, J. D. Birkmeyer, D. C. Charlesworth, D. J. Malenka, H. B. Ouinton, and J. F. Kasper. 1996. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association 275 (11): 841-46.
58. Omoigui, N. A., D. P. Miller, K. J. Brown, K. Annan, D. Cosgrove III, B. Lytle, F. Loop, and E. J. Topol. 1996. Outmigration for coronary artery bypass surgery in an era of public dissemination of clinical outcomes. Circulation 93 (1): 27-33.
59. Peterson, E. D., E. R. DeLong, J. G. Jollis, L. H. Muhlbaier, and D. B. Mark. 1998. The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 32 (4): 993-99.
60. Roach, G. W., M. Kanchuger, C. M. Mangano, M. Newman, N. Nussmeier, R. Wolman, A. Aggarwal, K. Marschall, S. H. Graham, and C. Ley. 1996. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. New England Journal of Medicine 335 (25): 1857-63.
61. Romano, P. S., J. A. Rainwater, and D. Antonius. 1999. Grading the graders: How hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards. Medical Care 37 (3): 295-305.
62. Romano, P., and H. Zhou. 2004. Do well-publicized risk-adjusted outcomes reports affect hospital volume? Medical Care 42 (4): 367-77.
63. Rosenthal, M. B., R. Fernandopulle, H. R. Song, and B. Landon. 2004. Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement. Health Affairs 23 (2): 127-41.
64. Schauffler, H. H., and J. K. Mordavsky. 2001. Consumer reports in health care: Do they make a difference? Annual Review of Public Health 22: 69-89.
65. Schneider, E. C., and A. M. Epstein. 1996. Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care: A survey of cardiovascular specialists. New England Journal of Medicine 335 (4): 251-56.
66. _. 1998. Use of public performance reports: A survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association 279 (20): 1638-42.
67. Schulman, K. A., L. E. Rubenstein, D. M. Seils, M. Harris, J. Hadley and J. J. Escarce. 1997. Quality assessment in contracting for tertiary care services by HMOs: A case study of three markets. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 23 (2): 117-26.
68. Shahian, D. M., S.-L. Normand, D. F. Torchiana, S. M. Lewis, J. O. Pastore, R. E. Kuntz, and P. I. Dreyer. 2001. Cardiac surgery report cards: Comprehensive review and statistical critique. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 72 (6): 2155-68.
69. Shahian, D. M., W. Yip, G. Westcott, and J. Jacobson. 2000. Selection of a cardiac surgery provider in the managed care era. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 120 (5): 978-89.
70. Silber, J. H. 1999. Using outcomes to assess quality of care: Applications for cardiovascular surgery. In Outcome measurements, edited by K. Tuman. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.
71. Stark, K., and J. Goldstein. 2003. Raising the risk in heart surgery. Philadelphia Inquirer, April 27.
72. Thomas, J. W., and T. P. Hofer. 1999. Accuracy of risk-adjusted mortality rate as a measure of hospital quality of care. Medical Care 37 (1): 83-92.
73. Tu, J. V., and C. Cameron. 2003. Impact of an acute myocardial infarction report card in Ontario, Canada. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 15 (2): 131-37.
74. Werner, R. M., and D. A. Asch. 2005a. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. Journal of the American Medical Association 293 (10): 1239-44.
75. _. 2005b. Reply to letter to the editor. Journal of the American Medical Association 293 (24): 3000.