Optimal design for nonlinear estimation of the hemodynamic response function

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1253-1267

  Maus, Bärbel ^a   van Breukelen, Gerard J P ^b   Goebel, Rainer ^b   Berger, Martijn P F ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Double gamma function; fMRI; Genetic algorithm; Nonlinear model; Optimal design; Subject specific hemodynamic response function (HRF)

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE FUNCTION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NEUROIMAGING; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDY DESIGN; THEORY;

ALGORITHMS; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 81355137469     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: 10970193     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21289     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, D'Esposito M (1998): The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage 8: 360-369.
2. Atkinson AC, Donev AN, Tobias RD (2007): Optimum Experimental Designs with SAS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bandettini PA, Cox RW (2000): Event-related fMRI contrast when using constant interstimulus interval: Theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 43: 540-548.
4. Biancardi M, Cerasa A, Patria F, Hagberg, GE (2004): Evaluation of mixed effects in event-related fMRI studies: Impact of first-level design and filtering. Neuroimage 22: 1351-1370.
5. Birn RM, Cox RW, Bandettini PA (2002): Detection versus estimation in event-related fMRI: Choosing the optimal stimulus timing. Neuroimage 15: 252-264.
6. Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ (1996): Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci 16(13): 4207-4221.
7. Buračas GT, Boynton GM (2002): Efficient design of event-related fMRI experiments using m-sequences. Neuroimage 16: 801-813.
8. Buxton, RB, Uludaǧ K, Dubowitz DJ, Liu TT (2004): Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Neuroimage 23: S220-S233.
9. Ciuciu P, Poline J-B, Marrelec G, Idier J, Pallier C, Benali H (2003): Unsupervised robust nonparametric estimation of the hemodynamic response function for any fMRI experiment. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22: 1235-1251.
10. Crellin N, Hastie T, Johnstone I (1999): Statistical models for image sequences. Technical report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University http://statistics.stanford.edu./∼ckirby/techreports/BIO/BIO%20205.pdf.
11. Dale AM (1999): Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 8: 109-114.
12. de Zwaart JA, Silva AC, van Gelderen P, Kellman P, Fukunaga M, Chu R, Koretsky AP, Frank JA, Duyn JH (2005): Temporal dynamics of the BOLD fMRI impulse response. Neuroimage 24: 667-677.
13. Friston KJ, Fletcher P, Josephs O, Holmes AP, Rugg MD, Turner R (1998): Event-related fMRI: Characterizing differential responses. Neuroimage 7: 30-40.
14. Friston KJ, Glaser DE, Henson RNA, Kiebel S, Philips C, Ashburner JT (2002): Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: Applications. Neuroimage 16: 484-512.
15. Friston KJ, Zarahn E, Josephs O, Henson RNA, Dale AM (1999): Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 10: 607-619.
16. Glover GH (1999): Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 9: 416-429.
17. Goutte C, Nielsen FA, Hansen LK (2000): Modeling the haemodynamic response in fMRI using smooth FIR filters. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19(12): 1188-1201.
18. Hagberg GE, Zito G, Patria F, Sanes JN (2001): Improved detection of event-related functional MRI signals using probability functions. Neuroimage 14: 1193-1205.
19. Handwerker DA, Ollinger JM, D'Esposito M (2004). Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 21: 1639-1657.
20. Henson RNA, Friston KJ (2007): Convolution models for fMRI. In: Friston KJ, Ashburner JT, Kiebel SJ, Nichols TE, Penny WD, editors. Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. pp 178-192.
21. Huettel SA, McCarthy G (2000): Evidence for a refractory period in the hemodynamic response to visual stimuli as measured by MRI. Neuroimage 11: 547-553.
22. Josephs O, Turner R, Friston KJ (1997): Event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 5: 243-248.
23. Kao M-H, Mandal A, Lazar N, Stufken J (2009): Multi-objective optimal experimental designs for event-related fMRI studies. Neuroimage 44: 849-856.
24. Le TH, Patel S, Roberts TPL (2001): Functional MRI of human auditory cortex using block and event-related designs. Magn Reson Med 45: 254-260.
25. Lindquist MA, Wager TD (2007): Validity and power in hemodynamic response modeling: A comparison study and a new approach. Hum Brain Mapp 28: 764-784.
26. Lindquist MA, Loh JM, Atlas LY, Wager TD (2009): Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: Efficiency, bias and mis-modeling. Neuroimage 45: S187-S198.
27. Liu TT, Frank LR, Wong EC, Buxton RB (2001): Detection power, estimation efficiency, and predictability in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 13: 759-773.
28. Liu TT, Frank LR (2004): Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related fMRI with multiple trial types, Part I: Theory. NeuroImage 21: 387-400.
29. Liu TT (2004): Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related fMRI with multiple trial types, Part II: Design of experiments. NeuroImage 21: 401-413.
30. Logothetis NK, Wandell BA (2004): Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annu Rev Physiol 66: 735-769.
31. Maus B, van Breukelen GJP, Goebel R, Berger MPF (2010): Robustness of optimal design of fMRI experiments with application of a genetic algorithm. Neuroimage 49: 2433-2443.
32. Miezin FM, Maccotta L, Ollinger JM, Petersen SE, Buckner RL (2000): Characterizing the hemodynamic response: Effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. Neuroimage 11: 735-759.
33. Ollinger JM, Shulman GL, Corbetta M (2001a): Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI, I. The Method. Neuroimage 13: 210-217.
34. Ollinger JM, Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2001b): Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI, II. Analysis. Neuroimage 13: 218-229.
35. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A, Friston KJ (2004): Modelling functional integration: A comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models. Neuroimage 23: S264-S274.
36. Rajapakse JC, Kruggel F, Maisog JM, von Cramon DY (1998): Modeling hemodynamic response for analysis of functional MRI time-series. Hum Brain Mapp 6: 283-300.
37. Wager TD, Nichols TE (2003): Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: A general framework using a genetic algorithm. Neuroimage 18: 293-309.
38. Woolrich MW, Behrens TEJ, Smith SM (2004): Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using variational Bayes. Neuroimage 21: 1748-1761.
39. Zarahn E, Aguirre GK, D'Esposito M (1997): A trial based experimental design for fMRI. Neuroimage 6: 122-138.
40. Zarahn E, Friston KJ (2002): Some limit results for efficiency in stochastic fMRI designs. Biom J 44: 496-509.