Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related fMRI with multiple trial types. Part II: Design of experiments

NeuroImage

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 401-413

  Liu, Thomas T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Entropy; Functional magnetic resonance

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ENTROPY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; RANDOMIZATION; STIMULUS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 1642492953     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aguirre G.K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. NeuroImage. 8:1998;360-369.
2. Birn R.M., Cox R.W., Bandettini P.A. Detection versus estimation in event-related fMRI: choosing the optimal stimulus timing. NeuroImage. 15:2002;252-264.
3. Bischoff-Grethe A., Martin M., Mao H., Berns G.S. The context of uncertainty modulates the subcortical response to predictability. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13:2001;986-993.
4. Buracas G.T., Boynton G.M. Efficient design of event-related fMRI experiments using m-sequences. NeuroImage. 16:2002;801-813.
5. Burock M.A., Buckner R.L., Woldorff M.G., Rosen B.R., Dale A.M. Randomized event-related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI. NeuroReport. 9:1998;3735-3739.
6. Buxton R.B., Liu T.T., Martinez A., Frank L.R., Luh W.-M., Wong E.C. Sorting out event-related paradigms in fMRI: the distinction between detecting an activation and estimating the hemodynamic response. NeuroImage. 11:2000;S457.
7. Cover T.M., Thomas J.A. Elements of Information Theory. 1991;Wiley, New York.
8. Cox R.W. AFNI-software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29:1996;162-173.
9. Friston K.J., Frith C.D., Turner R., Frackowiak R.S.J. Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI. NeuroImage. 2:1995;157-165.
10. Friston K.J., Josephs O., Rees G., Turner R. Nonlinear event-related responses in fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 39:1998;41-52.
11. Friston K.J., Zarahn E., Josephs O., Henson R.N.A., Dale A.M. Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. NeuroImage. 10:1999;607-619.
12. Godfrey K. Perturbation Signals for System Identification. 1993;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Liu T.T., Frank L.R. Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related fMRI with multiple trial types - Part I: theory. NeuroImage. 21:2004;387-400.
14. Liu T.T., Frank L.R., Wong E.C., Buxton R.B. Detection power, estimation efficiency, and predictability in event-related fMRI. NeuroImage. 13:2001;759-773.
15. Miller K.L., Luh W.-M., Liu T.T., Martinez A., Obata T., Wong E.C., Frank L.R., Buxton R.B. Nonlinear temporal dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response. Hum. Brain Mapp. 13:2001;1-12.
16. Wager T.D., Nichols T.E. Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm. NeuroImage. 18:2003;293-309.