Flow acceleration time and ratio of acceleration time to ejection time for prosthetic aortic valve function

JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1161-1170

  Ben Zekry, Sagit ^a   Saad, Robert M ^a   Zkan, Mehmet ^b   Al Shahid, Maie S ^c   Pepi, Mauro ^d   Muratori, Manuela ^d   Xu, Jiaqiong ^a   Little, Stephen H ^a   Zoghbi, William A ^a  

^a HOUSTON METHODIST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Department of Cardiovascular Surgery   (Turkey)

^c KING FAISAL SPECIALIST HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Saudi Arabia)

^d CENTRO CARDIOLOGICO MONZINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; aortic valve; Doppler echocardiography; ejection parameters; prosthetic valve dysfunction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ATS VALVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART VENTRICLE EJECTION TIME; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHETIC VALVE DYSFUNCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLIC TIME INTERVAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; ITALY; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SAUDI ARABIA; STROKE VOLUME; SYSTOLE; TEXAS; TIME FACTORS; TURKEY; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 81255162882     PISSN: 1936878X     EISSN: 18767591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. E.R. Chafizadeh, and W.A. Zoghbi Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position using the continuity equation Circulation 83 1991 213 223
2. R.M. Saad, J. Barbetseas, L. Olmos, N. Rubio, and W.A. Zoghbi Application of the continuity equation and valve resistance to the evaluation of St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve dysfunction Am J Cardiol 80 1997 1239 1242 (Pubitemid 27467424)
3. C. Masotti, C. De Castro, M. Aquilina, P. Bonfranceschi, and F. Rusticali Doppler hemodynamic characteristics of four widely used aortic valve prostheses Minerva Cardioangiol 38 1990 461 471
4. M.D. VanAuker, A. Hla, J.S. Meisner, and J.A. Strom Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet J Heart Valve Dis 9 2000 291 298 (Pubitemid 30187015)
5. B.W. Reagan, and E.K. Kerut Patient-prosthetic aortic valve mismatch: role of the echocardiographer Echocardiography 22 2005 365 366 (Pubitemid 40559541)
6. F. Knebel, V. Gliech, and T. Walde High concordance of invasive and echocardiographic mean pressure gradients in patients with a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis J Heart Valve Dis 14 2005 332 337 (Pubitemid 47050745)
7. K. Haerten, F.M. Erbel, H. Kuhn, C. Leuner, and F. Loogen The applicability of systolic time intervals in patients before and after aortic valve replacement (author's transl) Z Kardiol 68 1979 469 476 (Pubitemid 9207805)
8. D.J. Burstow, R.A. Nishimura, and K.R. Bailey Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients A simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study Circulation 80 1989 504 514 (Pubitemid 19231384)
9. R. Rosenhek, T. Binder, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 2003 1116 1127 (Pubitemid 37371655)
10. P. Pibarot, and J.G. Dumesnil Prevention of valve prosthesispatient mismatch before aortic valve replacement: does it matter and is it feasible? Heart 93 2007 549 551 (Pubitemid 46707103)
11. R.M. Rothbart, J.L. Castriz, L.V. Harding, C.D. Russo, and S.M. Teague Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic bioprosthetic valves J Am Coll Cardiol 15 1990 817 824 (Pubitemid 20101573)
12. W.A. Zoghbi, J.B. Chambers, and J.G. Dumesnil Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22 2009 975 1014
13. K. Nakamura, T. Shiina, and G. Satomi Severity of aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler techniques J Cardiol 17 1987 807 816
14. L. Hatle, B.A. Angelsen, and A. Tromsdal Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound Br Heart J 43 1980 284 292 (Pubitemid 10096613)
15. E.R. DeLong, D.M. DeLong, and D.L. Clarke-Pearson Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach Biometrics 44 1988 837 845
16. W.A. Zoghbi, A. Galan, and M.A. Quinones Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis severity by Doppler echocardiography independent of aortic jet velocity Am Heart J 116 1988 855 863