Simultaneous doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: A correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 291-298

  VanAuker, Michael D ^a   Hla, Aung ^b   Meisner, Jay S ^b   Strom, Joel A ^a  

^a BROOKDALE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE DISEASE; ARTICLE; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; DATA ANALYSIS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ENERGY BALANCE; GEOMETRY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; PREDICTION; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORY;

AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 0034070161     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bednarz JE, Krauss D, Lang RM. An echocardiographic approach to the assessment of aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996;9:286-294
2. Levine RA, Jimoh A, Cape EG, McMillan S, Yoganathan AP, Weyman AE. Pressure recovery distal to stenosis: Potential cause of gradient 'overestimation' by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989,13:706-715
3. Baumgartner H, Stefanelli T, Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G. 'Overestimation' of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: A predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999,33:1655-1661
4. Bengur AR, Snider AR, Meliones JN, Vermillion RP. Doppler evaluation of aortic valve area in children with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18:1499-1505
5. Hegrenaes L, Hatle L. Aortic stenosis in adults -noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J 1985;54:396-404
6. Lemler MS, Valdes-Cruz LM, Shandas RS, Cape EG. Insights into catheter/Doppler discrepancies in congenital aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:1447-1450
7. Ohlsson J, Wranne B. Noninvasive assessment of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:501-508
8. Hatle L, Angelsen B. Doppler Ultrasound in Cardiology. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1985
9. Baumgartner H, Schima H, Tulzer G, Kuhn P. Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: A manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993,21:1018-1025
10. Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography, 5th edition. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1994:278-281
11. Cape EG, Jones M, Yamada I, VanAuker MD, Valdes-Cruz LM. Turbulent/ viscous interactions control Doppler/catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis: The role of the Reynolds number. Circulation 1996;94:2975-2981
12. Clark C. The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis. I: Theory and steady flow experiments. J Biomechanics 1976;9:521-528
13. Hla A, Yao S-S, Daboin NP, Meisner JS, Shirani J, Monrad ES, Strom JA. Doppler echocardiography can predict the magnitude of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(Suppl.A):246A (abstract)
14. Laskey WK, Kussmaul WG. Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 1994;89:116-121
15. Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 1996;94:1934-1940
16. Rothbert RM, Smucker ML, Gibson RS. Overestimation by Doppler echocardiography of pressure gradients across Starr-Edwards prosthetic valves in the aortic position. Am J Cardiol 1988;61:475-476
17. Stewart SFC, Nast EP, Arabia FA, Talbot TL, Proschan M, Clark RE. Errors in pressure gradient measurement by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound: Type, size, and age effects in bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:769-779
18. Voelker W, Reul H, Stelzer T, Schmidt A, Karsch KR. Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: An in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1585-1593
19. Heinrich RS, Fontaine AA, Grimes RY, Sidhaye A, Yang S, Moore KE, Levine RA, Yoganathan AP. Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: Importance of pressure recovery. Ann Biomed Eng 1996;24:685-694
20. Flaschkampf FA, Weyman AE, Guerrero JL, Thomas JD. Influence of orifice geometry and flow rate on effective valve area: An in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:1173-1180
21. Blevins RD. Applied Fluid Dynamics Handbook, reprinted edition. Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, FL, 1992:235-236
22. Rajaratnam N. Developments in water science: Turbulent jets. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1976
23. Wygnanski I, Fiedler H. Some measurements in the self-preserving jet. J Fluid Mech 1969;38:577-612
24. Levin S, Ilercil A, Meisner JS, Shirani J, Strom JA. Mathematical model for prediction of pressure recovery location in stenotic aortic valves. Circulation 1996;94:I-315 (abstract)
25. Reynolds T. The Echocardiographer's Pocket Reference. Arizona Heart Institute Foundation, Phoenix, AZ, 1993
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310
27. Gotsis W, Meisner JS, Shirani J, Monrad ER, Lerrick KS, Strom JA. Measurement of coefficient of velocity for stenotic aortic valves in patients. Circulation 1995;92:I-466 (abstract)
28. Requarth JA, Goldberg SJ, Vasko SD, Allen HD. In vitro verification of Doppler prediction of transvalve pressure gradient and orifice area in stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:1369
29. Solowiejczyk DE, Yamada I, Cape EG, Manduley RA, Gersony WM, Jones M, Valdes-Cruz LM. Simultaneous Doppler and catheter transvalvular pressure gradients across St. Jude bileaflet mitral valve prosthesis: In vivo study in a chronic animal model with pediatric valve sizes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998;11:1145-1154