Percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site

Current Cardiology Reports

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 432-438

  Pride, Yuri B ^a   Gibson, C Michael ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute coronary syndrome; Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery; Coronary artery disease; Non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; On site cardiac surgery; Percutaneous coronary intervention; ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; Unstable angina

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DISEASE REGISTRY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 81255158852     PISSN: 15233782     EISSN: 15343170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-011-0197-y     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Smith Jr SC, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld Jr JW, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation. 2006;113(7): e166-286.
2. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, et al. Prospective, multicenter study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI stent pilot trial. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Stent Pilot Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(1):23-30 (Pubitemid 28064717)
3. The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. New Engl J Med. 1997;336(24):1689-96.
4. Jaber WA, Lennon RJ, Mathew V, et al. Application of evidence-based medical therapy is associated with improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and is a valid quality indicator. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1473-8. (Pubitemid 41446181)
5. Shubrooks Jr SJ, Nesto RW, Leeman D, et al. Urgent coronary bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent era: is backup still necessary? Am Heart J. 2001;142 (1):190-6. (Pubitemid 32595393)
6. Singh M, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, et al. Twenty-five-year trends in in-hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-institution experience. Circulation. 2007;115 (22):2835-41. (Pubitemid 46869670)
7. Yang EH, Gumina RJ, Lennon RJ, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(11):2004-9. (Pubitemid 41713582)
8. Altmann DB, Racz M, Battleman DS, et al. Reduction in angioplasty complications after the introduction of coronary stents: results from a consecutive series of 2,242 patients. Am Heart J. 1996;132(3):503-7. (Pubitemid 26347752)
9. Haan CK, O'Brien S, Edwards FH, et al. Trends in emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after percutaneous coronary intervention, 1994-2003. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(5):1658-65. (Pubitemid 350029990)
10. Talley JD, Weintraub WS, Roubin GS, et al. Failed elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty requiring coronary artery bypass surgery. In-hospital and late clinical outcome at 5 years. Circulation. 1990;82(4):1203-13.
11. Vogt A, Bonzel T, Harmjanz D, et al. PTCA registry of German community hospitals. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiolo-gischer Krankenhausarzte (ALKK) Study Group. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(7):1110-4.
12. Pride YB, Canto JG, Frederick PD, Gibson CM. Outcomes among patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting to interventional hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(10):944-52.
13. Pride YB, Canto JG, Frederick PD, Gibson CM. Outcomes among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presenting to interventional hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(6):574-82.
14. Smith Jr SC, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld Jr JW, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation. 2006;113(1):156-75.
15. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 2004;110 (9):e82-e292.
16. Kumbhani DJ, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, et al. Association of hospital primary angioplasty volume in STsegment elevation myocardial infarction with quality and outcomes. JAMA. 2009;302(20):2207-13.
17. Canto JG, Every NR, Magid DJ, et al. The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. New Engl J Med. 2000;342(21): 1573-80. (Pubitemid 30340504)
18. Magid DJ, Calonge BN, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy. JAMA. 2000;284(24):3131-8. (Pubitemid 32039075)
19. Srinivas VS, Hailpern SM, Koss E, et al. Effect of physician volume on the relationship between hospital volume and mortality during primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(7):574-9.
20. McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, Dickens Jr JD, et al. Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. JAMA. 2000;284(24):3139-44. (Pubitemid 32039076)
21. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Siewers AE, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2004;292(16):1961-8. (Pubitemid 39411204)
22. Gruentzig AR. Transluminal dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis. Lancet. 1978;1:1.
23. Gruentzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. New Engl J Med. 1979;301:8.
24. Sinclair IN, McCabe CH, Sipperly ME, Baim DS. Predictors, therapeutic options and long-term outcome of abrupt reclosure. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61(14):61G-6G
25. de Feyter PJ, van den Brand M, Laarman GJ, et al. Acute coronary artery occlusion during and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Frequency, prediction, clinical course, management, and follow-up. Circulation. 1991;83 (3):927-36.
26. Hannan EL, Arani DT, Johnson LW, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. Risk factors and outcomes. JAMA. 1992;268(21):3092-7.
27. Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. New Engl J Med. 1987;316(12):701-6. (Pubitemid 17036474)
28. Seshadri N, Whitlow PL, Acharya N, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Circulation. 2002;106(18):2346-50. (Pubitemid 35244736)
29. Ting HH, Garratt KN, Singh M, et al. Low-risk percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery: 2 years' observational experience and follow-up. Am Heart J. 2003;145 (2):278-84. (Pubitemid 36207949)
30. Long KH, McMurtry EK, Lennon RJ, et al. Elective percutaneous coronary intervention without on-site cardiac surgery: clinical and economic implications. Med Care. 2006;44(5):406-13. (Pubitemid 43755419)
31. Frutkin AD, Mehta SK, Patel T, et al. Outcomes of 1,090 consecutive, elective, nonselected percutaneous coronary interventions at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(1):53-7. (Pubitemid 350297199)
32. Melberg T, Nordrehaug JE, Nilsen DW. A comparison of the health status after percutaneous coronary intervention at a hospital with and without on-site cardiac surgical backup: a randomized trial in nonemergent patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(2):235-43.
33. Melberg T, Nilsen DW, Larsen AI, et al. Nonemergent coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical backup: a randomized study evaluating outcomes in low-risk patients. Am Heart J. 2006;152 (5):888-95. (Pubitemid 44632952)
34. Roussanov O, Estacio G, Capuno M, et al. Nonemergent percutaneous coronary interventions in a veterans affairs medical center without onsite cardiac surgery. Am Heart J. 2006;152(5):909-13 (Pubitemid 44632937)
35. The TIMIIIIB Investigators. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation 1994;89 (4):1545-56.
36. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Crawford MH, et al. Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators. New Engl J Med. 1998;338(25):1785-92. (Pubitemid 28277958)
37. The FRISC II Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospec-tive randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet 1999;354(9180):708-15.
38. Wallentin L, Lagerqvist B, Husted S, et al. Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease. Lancet. 2000;356(9223):9-16. (Pubitemid 30416988)
39. Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet. 2002;360(9335):743-51. (Pubitemid 35247703)
40. Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. New Engl J Med. 2009;360(21):2165-75.
41. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA. 1997;278(23):2093-8. (Pubitemid 28016233)
42. Nordmann AJ, Bucher H, Hengstler P, et al. Primary stenting versus primary balloon angioplasty for treating acute myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;18(2):CD 005313.
43. Aversano T, Aversano LT, Passamani E, et al. Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;287(15):1943-51. (Pubitemid 34309752)
44. Wharton Jr TP, McNamara NS, Fedele FA, et al. Primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: experience at two community hospitals without cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(5):1257-65.
45. Singh M, Ting HH, Gersh BJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for STsegment and non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79(6):738-44. (Pubitemid 38691824)
46. Weaver WD, Litwin PE, Martin JS. Use of direct angioplasty for treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery. The Myocardial Infarction, Triage, and Intervention Project Investigators. Circulation. 1993;88(5 Pt 1):2067-75. (Pubitemid 23326084)
47. Brush Jr JE, Thompson S, Ciuffo AA, et al. Retrospective comparison of a strategy of primary coronary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in a community hospital without cardiac surgical backup. J Invasive Cardiol. 1996;8(2):91-8. (Pubitemid 126736615)
48. Wharton Jr TP, Grines LL, Turco MA, et al. Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with no surgery on-site (the PAMI-No SOS study) versus transfer to surgical centers for primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(11):1943-50. (Pubitemid 38686785)
49. Shiraishi J, Kohno Y, Sawada T, et al. In-hospital outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary interventions performed at hospitals with and without on-site coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circ J. 2007;71(8):1208-12. (Pubitemid 47195334)
50. Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Racz M, et al. Outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the New York State experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(6):519-27.