Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With vs Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery Backup: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 664.e9-664.e16

  Zia, Mohammad I ^a   Wijeysundera, Harindra C ^a   Tu, Jack V ^a,b   Lee, Douglas S ^b   Ko, Dennis T ^a,b  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 81255138057     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2010.12.057     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Seshadri N., Whitlow P.L., Acharya N., et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Circulation 2002, 106:2346-2350.
2. Yang E.H., Gumina R.J., Lennon R.J., et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:2004-2009.
3. Weaver W.D. Why we should not do percutaneous coronary intervention at sites without surgical backup. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005, 65:8-9.
4. Smith S.C., Feldman T.E., Hirshfeld J.W., et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006, 113:e166-e286.
5. Dehmer G.J., Blankenship J., Wharton T.P., et al. The current status and future direction of percutaneous coronary intervention without on-site surgical backup: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2007, 69:471-478.
6. Dehmer G.J., Kutcher M.A., Dey S.K., et al. Frequency of percutaneous coronary interventions at facilities without on-site cardiac surgical backup: a report from the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). Am J Cardiol 2007, 99:329-332.
7. Stroup D.F., Berlin J.A., Morton S.C., et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000, 283:2008-2012.
8. Shadish W.R., Haddock C.R. The Handbook of Research Synthesis 1994, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.
9. Begg C.B., Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994, 50:1088-1101.
10. Egger M., Davey S.G., Schneider M., Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315:629-634.
11. Baduini G., Belli R., de Benedictis M., et al. [Coronary angioplasty in an Italian hospital without on-site cardiac surgery: the results and outlook]. G Ital Cardiol 1994, 24:1529-1536.
12. Iniguez A., Macaya C., Hernandez R., et al. Comparison of results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with and without selective requirement of surgical standby. Am J Cardiol 1992, 69:1161-1165.
13. Meier B., Urban P., Dorsaz P.A., Favre J. Surgical standby for coronary balloon angioplasty. JAMA 1992, 268:741-745.
14. Moquet B., Huguet R.G., Cami G., et al. [Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. A one-year experience in a small urban community]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1997, 90:11-15.
15. Politi A., Zerboni S., Galli M., et al. [Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: experience and results in the first 1,000 consecutive patients]. Ital Heart J 2003, 4(Suppl):755-763.
16. Singh M., Ting H.H., Gersh B.J., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability. Mayo Clin Proc 2004, 79:738-744.
17. Ting H.H., Garratt K.N., Singh M., et al. Low-risk percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery: two years' observational experience and follow-up. Am Heart J 2003, 145:278-284.
18. Weaver W.D. PTCA in centers without surgical backup: outcome, logistics and technical aspects. J Invasive Cardiol 1997, 9(suppl B):20B-23B.
19. Kutcher M.A., Klein L.W., Ou F.S., et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:16-24.
20. Carlsson J., James S.N., Stahle E., Hofer S., Lagerqvist B. Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby. Heart 2007, 93:335-338.
21. Peels H.O., de Swart H., Ploeg T.V., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with off-site cardiac surgery backup for acute myocardial infarction as a strategy to reduce door-to-balloon time. Am J Cardiol 2007, 100:1353-1358.
22. Pereira H., da Silva P.C., Goncalves L., Jose B. Elective and primary angioplasty at hospitals without on-site surgery versus with on-site surgery: results from a national registry. Rev Port Cardiol 2008, 27:769-782.
23. Sanborn T.A., Jacobs A.K., Frederick P.D., Every N.R., French W.J. Comparability of quality-of-care indicators for emergency coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction regardless of on-site cardiac surgery (report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction). Am J Cardiol 2004, 93:1335-1339. A5.
24. Ting H.H., Raveendran G., Lennon R.J., et al. A total of 1,007 percutaneous coronary interventions without onsite cardiac surgery: acute and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1713-1721.
25. Weaver W.D., Parsons L., Every N. Primary coronary angioplasty in hospitals with and without surgery backup. MITI project investigators. J Invasive Cardiol 1995, 7(suppl F):34F-39F.
26. Wennberg D.E., Lucas F.L., Siewers A.E., Kellett M.A., Malenka D.J. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2004, 292:1961-1968.
27. Wharton T.P., Grines L.L., Turco M.A., et al. Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with no surgery on-site (the PAMI-No SOS study) versus transfer to surgical centers for primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:1943-1950.
28. Frutkin A.D., Mehta S.K., Patel T., et al. Outcomes of 1,090 consecutive, elective, nonselected percutaneous coronary interventions at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 2008, 101(1):53-57.
29. Melberg T., Nilsen D.W., Larsen A.I., et al. Nonemergent coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical backup: a randomized study evaluating outcomes in low-risk patients. Am Heart J 2006, 152:888-895.
30. Aversano T., Aversano L.T., Passamani E., et al. Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002, 287:1943-1951.
31. Balachandran K.P., Miller J., Pell A.C., Vallance B.D., Oldroyd K.G. Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: results from a district general hospital. Postgrad Med J 2002, 78:330-334.
32. Brown D.C., Mogelson S., Harris R., Kemp D., Massey M. Percutaneous coronary interventions in a rural hospital without surgical backup: report of one year of experience. Clin Cardiol 2006, 29:337-340.
33. Brush J.E., Thompson S., Ciuffo A.A., et al. Retrospective comparison of a strategy of primary coronary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in a community hospital without cardiac surgical backup. J Invasive Cardiol 1996, 8:91-98.
34. Dellavalle A., Steffenino G., Ribichini F., Russo P., Uslenghi E. Elective coronary angioplasty with and without surgical standby: clinical and angiographic criteria for the selection of patients. Coron Artery Dis 1995, 6:513-520.
35. Dudek D., Rakowski T., Legutko J., et al. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with non ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in catheterisation laboratory without on-site surgical back-up. Kardiol Pol 2003, 58:356-365.
36. Hayat N.J., Varghese K., Salman H., Elghoul S., Abraham M.T. Angioplasty in the stent era: results of a consecutive series of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty without surgical backup. Int J Cardiol 1998, 64:241-246.
37. Iannone L.A., Anderson S.M., Phillips S.J. Coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in a hospital without cardiac surgery. Tex Heart Inst J 1993, 20:99-104.
38. Klinke W.P., Hui W. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical facilities. Am J Cardiol 1992, 70:1520-1525.
39. Loubeyre C., Morice M.C., Berzin B., et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery following coronary angioplasty and stenting: results of a French multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999, 47:441-448.
40. Paraschos A., Callwood D., Wightman M.B., et al. Outcomes following elective percutaneous coronary intervention without on-site surgical backup in a community hospital. Am J Cardiol 2005, 95:1091-1093.
41. Ribichini F. Experiences with primary angioplasty without on site-cardiac surgery. Semin Interv Cardiol 1999, 4:47-53.
42. Richardson S.G., Morton P., Murtagh J.G., et al. Management of acute coronary occlusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: experience of complications in a hospital without on site facilities for cardiac surgery. BMJ 1990, 300:355-358.
43. Roussanov O., Estacio G., Capuno M., et al. Nonemergent percutaneous coronary interventions in a veterans affairs medical center without onsite cardiac surgery. Am Heart J 2006, 152:909-913.
44. Smyth D.W., Richards A.M., Elliott J.M. Direct angioplasty for myocardial infarction: one-year experience in a center with surgical back-up 220 miles away. J Invasive Cardiol 1997, 9:324-332.
45. Turgeman Y., Atar S., Suleiman K., et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic percutaneous cardiac interventions without on-site surgical backup: review of 11 years experience. Isr Med Assoc J 2003, 5:89-93.
46. Wharton T.P., McNamara N.S., Fedele F.A., et al. Primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: experience at two community hospitals without cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 33:1257-1265.
47. Zavala-Alarcon E., Cecena F., Ashar R., et al. Safety of elective-including "high risk"-percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery. Am Heart J 2004, 148:676-683.
48. Dorsch M.F., Blackman D.J., Greenwood J.P., et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction-first year's experience of a tertiary referral centre in the UK. Clin Med 2008, 8:259-263.
49. Shaikh A.H., Siddiqui M.S., Hanif B., et al. Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a tertiary care cardiac centre. J Pak Med Assoc 2009, 59:426-429.
50. Cox D.A., Stone G.W., Grines C.L., et al. Comparative early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (from the CADILLAC trial). Am J Cardiol 2006, 98:331-337.